Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Change in cardiovascular risk profile by echocardiography in medium-risk elderly hypertensives

Journal of Human Hypertension volume 17, pages 101–106 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

It has been clearly demonstrated that ageing and arterial hypertension are both associated with an increased prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), which is a powerful risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) events. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of echocardiographic LVH in profiling the absolute CV risk stratification according to the 1999 World Health Organization–International Society of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) guidelines in elderly hypertensive patients. A total of 223 never-treated elderly patients (⩾65 years) with essential hypertension (98 men, 125 women, mean age 72±5 years) referred to our outpatient hospital clinic were included in the study. They underwent the following procedures: (1) medical history, physical examination, and clinic blood pressure; (2) routine blood chemistry and urine analysis and (3) electrocardiogram. The risk was initially stratified according to the routine procedures suggested by WHO/ISH guidelines and subsequently reassessed by adding the results of echocardiography (LVH as left ventricular mass index >51 g/m2.7 in men and >47g/m2.7 in women). According to routine classification, 56% (n=125) were medium-risk patients, 29% (64) high-risk and 15% (34) very-high-risk patients. The overall prevalence of LVH was 56% (48% in medium-risk and 62% in high-risk or very-high-risk patients, P<0.01). A marked change in risk stratification was observed when echocardiographic LVH was taken into consideration: medium-risk patients decreased to 29% and high-risk patients rose to 56% (P<0.01). In conclusion, ultrasound assessment of cardiac target organ damage is extremely useful in obtaining a more valid assessment of global cardiovascular risk in elderly hypertensives, because stratification based on diagnostic routine procedures can underestimate the overall risk in a large fraction (48%) of medium-risk subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Collins R et al. Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 2: short term reductions in blood pressure overview of randomized drugs trials in their epidemiological context. Lancet 1990; 335: 827–838.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moser M, Hebert P . Prevention of disease progression, left ventricular hypertrophy and congestive heart failure in hypertension treatment trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 1224–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Weber MA, Julius S . The challenge of very mild hypertension, should treatment be sooner or later. Am J Hypertens 1998; 11: 1495–1496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ogden LG, He J, Lydick E, Whelton PK . Long-term absolute benefit of lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients according to the JNC VI risk stratification. Hypertension 2000; 35: 539–543.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 2413–2446.

  6. Guidelines Subcommittee. 1999 World Health Organization–International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. J Hypertens 1999: 17: 151–183.

  7. Levy D et al. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1561–1566.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Casale PN et al. Value of echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular mass in predicting cardiovascular morbid events in hypertensive men. Arch Intern Med 1986; 105: 173–178.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Levy D et al. Determinants of sensitivity and specificity of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation 1990; 81: 815–820.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Devereux RB et al. Electrocardiographic detection of left ventricular hypertrophy using echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass as reference standard. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 3: 82–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu JE, Devereux RB . Clinical assessment of cardiac Hypertrophy. In: Sheridan DJ (ed). Left Ventricular Hypertrophy. Churchill Livingstone, London, 1998, pp 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lakatta EG . Similar myocardial effects of aging and hypertension. Eur Heart J 1990; 11 (Suppl G): 29–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pearson AG, Gudipati CV, Labovitz AJ . Effects of aging on left ventricular structure and function. Am Heart J 1991; 121: 871–875.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Devereux RB, Reichek N . Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man. Anatomic validation of the method. Circulation 1977; 55: 613–618.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hammond I et al.. The prevalence and correlates of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy among employed patients with uncomplicated hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 7: 639–650.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. de Simone G et al. Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and the impact of overweight. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20: 1251–1260.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cuspidi C et al. Lack of correlation beteween left ventricular mass and diameter of left main coronary artery trunk in hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens 1999; 12: 1163–1168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schillaci G et al. Improved electrocardiographic diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 1994; 74: 714–719.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Okin PM, Roman MJ, Devereux RB, Kligfield P . Electrocardiographic identification of left ventricular hypertrophy: test performance in relation to definition of hypertrophy and presence of obesity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 124–131.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. de Simone G et al. Effect of growth on variability of left ventricular mass: assessment of allometric signals in adults and children and their capacity to predict cardiovascular risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 1056–1062.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ganau A et al. Patterns of left vetricular geometry and geometric remodelling in essential hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 1550–1558.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. de Simone G, Schillaci G, Palmieri V, Devereux RB . Should all patients with hypertension have echocardiography? J Hum Hypertens 2000; 14: 417–421.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Abergel E, Chatellier G, Battaglia C, Menard J . Can echocardiography identify mildly hypertensive patients at high risk, left untreated based on current guidelines? J Hypertens 1999; 17: 817–824.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cuspidi C et al. Cardiovascular risk stratification in hypertensive patients: impact of echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography. J Hypertens 2001; 19: 375–380.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cuspidi C et al. Influence of different echocardiographic criteria for detection of left ventricular hypertrophy on cardiovascular risk stratification in recently diagnosed hypertensives. J Hum Hypertens 2001; 15: 619–625.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cuspidi C et al. on behalf of the APROS Investigators. The role of echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography in stratifying risk in patients with essential hypertension: the APROS Study (Assessment of Prognostic Risk Observational Survey). J Hypertens 2002; 20: 1307–1314.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schillaci G et al. Change in cardiovascular risk profile by echocardiography in low or medium risk hypertension. J Hypertens 2002; 20: 1519–1525.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. de Simone G et al. Relation of hemodynamics and risk factors to ventricular–vascular interactions in the elderly: the Cardiovascular Health Study. J Hypertens 2001; 19: 1893–1903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Coca A et al., on behalf of the VITAE investigators. The impact of different echocardiographic diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension. The VITAE study. J Hypertens 1999; 17: 1471–1480.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wachtell K et al. Impact of different partition values on prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy and concentric geometry in a large hypertensive population in the LIFE study. Hypertension 2000; 35: 6–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schillaci G et al. Continuous relation between left ventricular mass and cardiovascular risk in essential hypertension. Hypertension 2000; 35: 580–586.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Liao Y et al. Prediction of mortality risk by different methods of indexation for left ventricular mass. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 641–647.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Istituto di Clinica e Terapia Medica and Centro di Fisiologia Clinica e Ipertensione, Università di Milano, Ospedale Maggiore IRCCS, Milan, Italy

    C Cuspidi, L Michev, B Severgnini, S Meani, V Fusi, C Valerio, G Bertazzoli, F Magrini & A Zanchetti

Authors
  1. C Cuspidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L Michev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B Severgnini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S Meani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. V Fusi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. C Valerio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. G Bertazzoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. F Magrini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. A Zanchetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Cuspidi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cuspidi, C., Michev, L., Severgnini, B. et al. Change in cardiovascular risk profile by echocardiography in medium-risk elderly hypertensives. J Hum Hypertens 17, 101–106 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001507

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001507

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links