Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

The COMpliance PraxiS Survey (COMPASS): a multidimensional instrument to monitor compliance for patients on antihypertensive medication

Abstract

Low compliance is suspected as a major reason for treatment failure in hypertensive patients. To identify patients with low compliance at the commencement of antihypertensive treatment, the compliance praxis survey (COMPASS) was utilised. A total of 161 physicians identified 2389 hypertensive patients treated by ACE-inhibitor. The physicians rated the compliance of the patients at baseline and at 6-month follow-up prospectively. Standard care was given. The mean age of patients was 64.5 years (54.4% women). The baseline overall score of compliance was medium to high in 97.3% of patients. A quarter of all patients (24.7%) were described as having difficulties to follow lifestyle changes, 22.3% lacked sufficient social support, and 31.0% were unwilling to obtain additional information about illness and treatment. Patients who had received prior treatment for cardiovascular disease were less compliant than those who received first treatment within this study (P=0.05). Younger (P<0.01), male patients (P<0.01), and those without prior cardiovascular disease (P<0.001) were significantly more likely to stop the antihypertensive treatment without a doctor's recommendation. Doctors' rating of compliance at baseline correlated well with ongoing treatment at 6-month follow-up. In conclusion, the COMPASS survey questionnaire is a useful instrument for doctors to differentiate between patients who lack resources and to then counsel patients based on their individual needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Statistisches Jahrbuch. 2001http://www.statistik-austria.at/

  2. Neaton JD et al. Treatment of mild hypertension study. Final results JAMA 1993 270: 713–724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gasse C et al. Assessing hypertension management in the community: trends of prevalence, detection, treatment, and control of hypertension in the MONICA project, Augsburg 1984–1995 J Hum Hypertens 2001 15: 27–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Graves JW . Management of difficult to control hypertension Mayo Clin Proc 2000 75: 2278–2284

    Google Scholar 

  5. Allen H . Promoting compliance with antihypertensive medication Br J Nursing 1998 7: 1252–1258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Donovan JL, Blake DR . Patient compliance: deviance or reasoned decision making Soc Sci Med 1992 34: 507–513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Epstein LH, Cluss PA . A behavioral medicine perspective on adherence to long-term medical regimens J Consult Clin Psychol 1982 50: 950–971

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Burnier M . Long-term compliance with antihypertensive therapy: another facet of chronotherapeutics in hypertension (review) Blood Press Monit 2000 5: (Suppl 1) S31-S34

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hammond SL, Lambert BL . Communicating about medications: directions for research Health Commun 1994 6: 247–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fodor G et al. Adherence to non-pharmacologic therapy for hypertension: problems and solutions Can J Public Health 1998 89: I12–I16

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Guidelines Subcommittee of the WHO-ISH. 1999 WHO-ISH guidelines for the management of hypertension J Hypertens 1999 17: 151–183

  12. Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch lntern Med 1997 157: 2413–2457

  13. Ascherio A et al. Prospective study of nutritional factors, blood pressure, and hypertension among US women Hypertension 1996 27: 1065–1072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Appel LJ et al. A clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. The DASH collaborative research group N Eng J Med 1997 336: 1117–1124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kravitz RL et al. Recall of recommendations and adherence to advice among patients with chronic medical conditions Arch Intern Med 1993 153: 1869–1878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. DiMatteo MR et al. Physicians' characteristics influence patients' adherence to medical treatment: results from the Medical Outcomes Study Health Psychol 1993 12: 93–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Furnham A . Overcoming the obstacles—the outsider's view Atherosclerosis 1999 147: (Suppl 1) S53-S56

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ley P . Communicating with Patients Chapman & Hall: London 1988

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mehos BM, Saseen JJ, Mac Laughlin EJ . Effect of a pharmacist intervention and initiation of home blood pressure monitoring in patients with uncontrolled hypertension Pharmacotherapy 2000 20: 1384–1389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Logan A, Irvine M . Compliance, labelling and hypertension. In: Swales J (ed) Textbook of Hypertension Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford 1994 pp 1267–1282

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stephenson BJ et al. Is this patient taking the treatment as prescribed? JAMA 1993 269: 2779–2781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Eisen S et al. The effect of prescribed daily dose frequency on patient medication compliance Arch Intern Med 1990 150: 1881–1884

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Haynes RB . Improving patient compliance in the management of hypertension. In: Kaplan NM, Ram CV (eds) Individualized Therapy of Hypertension Marcel Dekker Inc: New York 1995 pp 257–273

    Google Scholar 

  24. Haynes B, Haines A . Barriers and bridges to evidence-based clinical practice BMJ 1998 317: 273–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Shepherd J . From best evidence to best practice—what are the obstacles? Atherosclerosis 1999 147: (Suppl 1) S45-S51

    Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson ML, Vickery CE . Dietary practices nutrition knowledge and attitudes of coronary heart disease patients Health Values: Health Behav Educ Promot 1990 14: 3–8

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fishman T . The 90-second intervention: a patient compliance mediated technique to improve and control hypertension Public Health Rep 1995 110: 173–178

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Newell SA, Bowman JA, Cockburn JD . Can compliance with nonpharmacological treatments for cardiovascular disease be improved? Am J Prev Med 2000 18: 253–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Levine DM et al. Health education for hypertensive patients JAMA 1979 41: 1700–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mühlhauser L et al. Evaluation of a structured treatment and teaching program on hypertension in general practice Clin Exper Hypertens 1993 15: 125–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stanton AI . Determinants of adherence to medical regimens by hypertensive patients J Behav Med 1987 10: 377–394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Webb P . Effectiveness of patient education and psychosocial counselling in promoting compliance and control among hypertensive patients J Fam Pract 1980 10: 1047–1055

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Deccache A, Aujoulat I . A European perspective: common developments, differences and challenges in patient education Pat Educ Counsel 2001 44: 7–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Svensson S, Kjellgren KI, Ahlner J, Säljö R . Reasons for adherence with antihypertensive medication Int J Cardiol 2000 76: 157–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Meyer D, Leventhal H, Gutmann M . Common-sense models of illness: the example of hypertension Health Psychol 1985 4: 115–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wielgosz AT, Nolan RP . Biobehavioral factors in the context of ischemic cardiovascular diseases J Psychosom Res 2000 48: 339–345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Prohaska JO . Strong and weak principles for progressing from precontemplation to action on the basis of twelve problem behaviors Health Psychol 1994 13: 47–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Linden W . Psychological treatments in cardiac rehabilitation: review of rationales and outcomes J Psychosom Res 2000 48: 443–454

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Linden W, Lenz JW, Con AH . Individualized stress management for primary hypertension: a randomized trial Arch lnter Med 2001 161: 1071–1080

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Knight EL et al. Predictors of uncontrolled hypertension in ambulatory patients Hypertension 2001 38: 809–814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lloyd-Jones DM et al. Differential control of systolic and diastolic blood pressure Hypertension 2000 36: 594–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. McLane CG, Zyzanski SJ, Flocke SA . Factors associated with medication noncompliance in rural elderly hypertensive patients Am J Hypertens 1995 8: 206–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shah S, Cook DG . Inequalities in the treatment and control of hypertension: age, social isolation and lifestyle are more important than economic circumstances J Hypertens 2001 19: 1333–1340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lüscher TF, Vetter H, Siegenthaler W, Vetter W . Compliance in hypertension: facts and concepts J Hypertens 1985 3: 3–9

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kjellgren KI, Ahlner J, Säljö R . Taking antihypertensive medication—controlling or co-operating with patients Int J Cardiol 1995 47: 257–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Andrejak M et al. Electronic pill-box in the evaluation of antihypertensive treatment compliance: comparison of once-daily versus twice daily regimen Am J Hypertens 2000 13: 184–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Nuesch R et al. Relation between insufficient response to antihypertensive treatment and poor compliance with treatment: a prospective case-control study BMJ 2001 323: 142–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R Schoberberger.

Appendix

Appendix

figure 4

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schoberberger, R., Janda, M., Pescosta, W. et al. The COMpliance PraxiS Survey (COMPASS): a multidimensional instrument to monitor compliance for patients on antihypertensive medication. J Hum Hypertens 16, 779–787 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001479

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001479

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links