Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Left ventricular concentric remodelling and extracardiac target organ damage in essential hypertension

Abstract

Left ventricular (LV) concentric remodelling is an adaptive change in cardiac geometry frequently observed in arterial hypertension. This study was addressed to investigate the extent of extracardiac target organ damage (TOD) in patients with LV concentric remodelling. Two groups of never-treated essential hypertensives, 31 with normal LV geometry (group I, relative wall thickness: 0.39) and 31 with LV concentric remodelling (group II, relative wall thickness: 0.47) matched for age, sex, body mass index and mean 24-h systolic blood pressure (BP), were included in the study. They underwent clinical and laboratory examination, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), 24-h urinary collection for microalbuminuria, non-mydriatic photography of ocular fundi, echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography. In both groups age (I: 51 ± 11 years; II: 51 ± 11 years), body mass index (I: 25 ± 3 kg/m2; II: 26 ± 3 kg/m2), clinic and 24-h ABPM values (I: 149 ± 11/95 ± 8, 142 ± 11/91 ± 7 mm Hg; II: 150 ± 11/98 ± 9, 142 ± 12/92 ± 9 mm Hg) were similar by design. There were no differences between patients with normal LV geometry and with LV concentric remodelling in LVM index (97 ± 16 vs99 ± 16), carotid intima-media thickness (0.7 ± 0.02 vs 0.7 ± 0.02) and carotid plaques prevalence (35% vs 35%). Furthermore, no significant differences among the two groups were found in the prevalence of retinal changes and microalbuminuria. These results suggest that in hypertensive patients with similar BP and LVMI levels, LV concentric remodelling is not associated with more prominent TOD.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kannel WB, Gordon T, Offut T . Left ventricular hypertrophy by electrocardiogram. Prevalence, incidence and mortality in the Framingham Study Ann Intern Med 1969; 71: 89–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Levy D et al. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in Framingham Heart Study N Engl J Med 1990; 322: 1561–1566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ganau A et al. Patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy and geometric remodelling in essential hypertension J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 1550–1558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Coca A et al on behalf of the VITAE Investigators. The impact of different echocardiographic diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension J Hypertens 1999; 17: 1471–1480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Watchell et al. Impact of different partition values on prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy and concentric geometry in a large hypertensive population. The LIFE study Hypertension 2000; 35: 6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Koren MJ et al. Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential hypertension Ann Intern Med 1991; 114: 345–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Krumholz HM, Larson M, Levy D . Prognosis of left ventricular geometric patterns in the Framingham Heart Study J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 879–884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Verdecchia P et al. Prognostic value of left ventricular mass and geometry in systemic hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy Am J Cardiol 1996; 78: 197–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Blake J et al. Relation of obesity, high sodium intake and eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy to left ventricular exercise dysfunction in essential hypertension Am J Med 1990; 88: 477–485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. de Simone G et al. Assessment of left ventricular function by the mid-wall fractional shortening end-systolic stress relation in human hypertension J Am CollCardiol 1994; 23: 1444–1451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Roman MJ et al. Parallel cardiac and vascular adaptation in hypertension Circulation 1992; 86: 1909–1918

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shigematsu Y et al. Left ventricular geometry as an independent predictor for extracardiac target organ damage in essential hypertension Am J Hypertens 1998; 11: 1171–1177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Verdecchia P et al. Adverse prognostic significance of concentric remodelling of the left ventricle in hypertensivepatients with normal left ventricular mass J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 871–878

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Devereux RB . Left ventricular geometry, pathophysiology and prognosis J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 885–887

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K . Accuracy of the Spacelabs 90207 determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol J Hypertens 1991; 9: 573–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Devereux RB, Reichek N . Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man. Anatomic validation of the method Circulation 1977; 55: 613–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Devereux RB et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 450–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Savage DD, Garrison RY, Kannel WB . The spectrum of left ventricular hypertrophy in a general population sample: the Framingham Study Circulation 1987; 75(Suppl 1): 26–33

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spirito P, Maron BJ . Doppler echocardiography for assessing left ventricular diastolic function Ann Intern Med 1988; 109: 122–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pignoli P, Tremoli E, Poli A, Paoletti R . Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a direct measurement with ultrasound imaging Circulation 1986; 74: 1399–1408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Salonen R, Haapanen A, Salonen JT . Measurement of intima-media thickness of common carotid arteries with high resolution B-mode ultrasonography: inter and intra-observer variability Ultrasound Med Biol 1991; 17: 225–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zanchetti A et al on behalf of the ELSA investigators. Risk factors associated with alterations in carotid intima-media thickness in hypertension: baseline data from the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis J Hypertens 1998; 16: 949–961

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hodis HN et al. The role of carotid arterial intima-media thickness in predicting clinical coronary events Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 262–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cuspidi C et al. Lack of correlation between left ventricular mass and diameter of left coronary main trunk in hypertensivepatients Am J Hypertens 1999; 12: 1163–1168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cuspidi C et al. Echocardiographic and ultrasonographic evaluation of cardiac and vascular hypertrophy inpatients with essential hypertension Cardiology 1992; 80: 305–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hyman BN . The eye as a target organ: an updated classification of hypertensive retinopathy J Clin Hypertens 2000; 1: 233–236

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ghali JK, Liao YL, Cooper RS . Influence of left ventricular geometric patterns on prognosis inpatients with or without coronary artery disease J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 1635–1640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Roman MJ et al. Relation of arterial structure and function to left ventricular geometric patterns in hypertensive adults J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 751–756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Shigematsu Y et al. Clinical evidence for an association between left ventricular geometric adaptation and extracardiac target organ damage in essential hypertension J Hypertens 1995; 13: 155–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Muiesan ML et al. Cardiac and vascular structural changes: prevalence and relation to ambulatory blood pressure in a middle aged general population in northern Italy: the Vobarno Study Hypertension 1996; 27: 1046–1053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pierdomenico SD et al. Vascular changes in hypertensivepatients with different left ventricular geometry J Hypertens 1995; 13: 1071–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cuspidi C et al. Left ventricular concentric remodelling and carotid structural changes in essential hypertension J Hypertens 1996; 14: 1441–1446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Verdecchia P et al. Asymmetric left ventricular remodelling due to isolated septal thickening inpatients with systemic hypertension and normal left ventricular masses Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 247–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Aono T, Kuwajima I, Suzuki Y, Ozawa T . Relation between left ventricular remodelling and nocturnal blood pressure in the elderly with systemic hypertension Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 81–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Cuspidi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cuspidi, C., Macca, G., Michev, I. et al. Left ventricular concentric remodelling and extracardiac target organ damage in essential hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 16, 385–390 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001420

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001420

Keywords

Search

Quick links