Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Low rates of detection and treatment of hypertension among current cigarette smokers

Abstract

This report analysed data from the Health Survey for England 1994 to evaluate blood pressure (BP) management in relation to cigarette smoking. Data were analysed for 12 013 adults aged 16 years living in England in 1994. Among 2280 subjects with BP 160/95 mm Hg or treated with BP-lowering medication, rates of awareness were 63% in never-smokers, 66% in ex-smokers and 51% in current smokers. After adjusting for age, sex, housing tenure, educational attainment, and systolic and diastolic BP, the relative odds of hypertension awareness for smokers, compared with never-smokers, were 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.82, P < 0.001. In the same group, the rates of BP treatment were 50% in never-smokers, 53% in ex-smokers and 36% in current smokers (odds ratio 0.64, 0.49 to 0.84, P = 0.001). In 4500 subjects with BP 140/90 mm Hg or treated, there was also strong evidence that current smokers were less likely to be aware of their high BP or treated. In this group, ex-smokers were more likely than never-smokers to be aware (odds ratio 1.23, 1.06 to 1.42, P = 0.006) or treated for high BP (odds ratio 1.25, 1.06 to 1.47, P = 0.009). Detection and treatment of high BP are particularly relevant in subjects who continue to smoke.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jarvis MJ, Wardle J Social patterning of individual health behaviours: the case of cigarette smoking. In: Marmot M, Wilkinson RG, (eds) Social Determinants of Health Oxford University Press: Oxford 1999 pp 240–255

    Google Scholar 

  2. Primatesta P et alAssociation between smoking and blood pressure. Evidence from the Health Survey for England Hypertension 2000 37 187–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Colhoun HM, Hemingway H, Poulter NR Socio-economic status and blood pressure: an overview analysis J Hum Hypertens 1998 12 91–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sever P et alManagement guidelines in essential hypertension: report of the second working party of the British Hypertension Society BMJ 1993 306 983–987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Colhoun H, Prescott-Clarke P Health Survey for England 1994 HMSO: London, England 1996

    Google Scholar 

  6. Colhoun HM, Dong W, Poulter NR Blood pressure screening management and control in England. Results from the Health Survey for England 1994 J Hypertens 1998 16 747–753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stata Corporation Stata Statistical Software: Release 7 0 Stata Corporation: College Station, Texas 2001

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guibert R, Leduc N, Fournier P, Tetreault H What factors determine whether individuals found to have hypercholesterolaemia at mass screening accept advice to visit their physician Public Health 1999 113 105–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Data from the Health Survey for England are Crown Copyright and were used by permission of the UK Office for National Statistics (ONS) and the Data Archive University of Essex. Neither the Data Archive nor ONS bear any responsibility for the analysis and interpretation presented here.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to MC Gulliford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gulliford, M. Low rates of detection and treatment of hypertension among current cigarette smokers. J Hum Hypertens 15, 771–773 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001275

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001275

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links