Abstract
THE best reply to Mr. J. Reid Moir's criticism (NATURE, May 22, p. 296) on my paper in the Manchester memoirs discussing his sub-Crag flints will be the paper itself when published. The second part of his letter, dealing with the Ipswich skeleton, reveals so complete a change of ground that it is necessary to comment on it. In his original description (Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia, vol. i, part ii., p. 194) Mr. Moir laid very great stress on the fact that the contracted skeleton was lying partly embedded in glacial sand, and partly in decalcified boulder clay.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SUTCLIFFE, W. Sub-Red Crag Flint Implements and the Ipswich Skeleton. Nature 91, 348 (1913). https://doi.org/10.1038/091348b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/091348b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.