Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

A comparative evaluation of two different approaches to estimating age at adiposity rebound

International Journal of Obesity volume 30, pages 261–266 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

Objective:

To compare different approaches (visual estimation of individual BMI curves with polynomial models) to estimate age at adiposity rebound (AR), as different approaches might lead to different results. AR has been suggested as a critical period between intra-uterine life and early adulthood, and recent data showed that early age at AR is associated with higher body mass later in life.

Methods:

Longitudinal anthropometric data from the DOrtmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed (DONALD) Study were used to obtain individual BMI growth curves. We then compared the visual estimation approach to polynomial models in three different scenarios reflected by different data sets: an idealistic, an realistic, and a realistic scenario with imputed values.

Results:

In all three scenarios, the visual estimation yielded significantly higher estimates than the polynomial models of 2nd or 3rd order. Cross-tabulations of groups of age at AR (early, medium, and late) showed that truly concordant classification was low, ranging only from 51 to 63%. A closer examination of the data indicated that the differences in estimates were mainly due to differences in the underlying definitions: the polynomial models select the nadir in the growth curve as the age at AR, whereas the visual estimation deviates from this concept in those cases where there is plateau in the growth curve. In the latter instance, the turning point of the growth curve before its increase is selected as the age at rebound.

Conclusions:

Estimating AR with the visual approach appears to best reflect the physiological basis of the AR, and is also preferable, because it resulted in the lowest number of children with missing estimates for age at AR.

Only when the underlying criteria for the estimation of AR with the visual approach were modified, could concordant results between the two approaches be obtained. Considering the underlying physiological basis, it became clear that approaches which determine AR by simply identifying the nadir in the BMI curve do not reflect AR appropriately. This refers to those cases in which the nadir in the growth curve and the turning point at the onset of the adiposity increase are not identical.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lobstein T, Baur L, Uauy R . Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obes Rev 2004; 5 (Suppl 1): 4–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bellizzi MC, Dietz WH . Workshop on childhood obesity: summary of the discussion. Am J Clin Nutr 1999; 70: 173S–175S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dietz WH . Periods of risk in childhood for the development of adult obesity – what do we need to learn? J Nutr 1997; 127: S1884–S1886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cameron N, Demerath EW . Critical periods in human growth and their relationship to diseases of aging. Yearbook Phys Anthropol 2002; 45: 159–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rolland-Cachera MF, Deheeger M, Guilloud-Bataille M, Avons P, Patois E, Sempe M . Tracking the development of adiposity from one month of age to adulthood. Ann Hum Biol 1987; 14: 219–229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Whitaker RC, Pepe MS, Wright JA, Seidel KD, Dietz WH . Early adiposity rebound and the risk of adult obesity. Pediatrics 1998; 101: E5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rolland-Cachera MF, Deheeger M, Bellisle F . The adiposity rebound: its contribution to obesity in children and adults. In: Chen C, Dietz WH (eds). Obesity in childhood and adolescence. Nestlé nutrition workshop series, pediatric program Vol 49. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002. pp. 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  8. He Q, Karlberg J . Probability of adult overweight and risk change during the BMI rebound period. Obes Res 2002; 10: 135–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Prokopec M, Bellisle F . Adiposity in Czech children followed from 1 month of age to adulthood: analysis of individual BMI patterns. Ann Hum Biol 1993; 20: 517–525.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wisemandle W, Maynard LM, Guo SS, Siervogel RM . Childhood weight, stature, and body mass index among never overweight, early-onset overweight, and late-onset overweight groups. Pediatrics 2000; 106: E14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rolland-Cachera MF, Deheeger M, Bellisle F, Sempe M, Guilloud-Bataille M, Patois E . Adiposity rebound in children: a simple indicator for predicting obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 1984; 39: 129–135.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dorosty AR, Emmett PM, Cowin S, Reilly JJ . Factors associated with early adiposity rebound. ALSPAC Study Team. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 1115–1118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Siervogel RM, Roche AF, Guo SM, Mukherjee D, Chumlea WC . Patterns of change in weight/stature2 from 2 to 18 years: findings from long-term serial data for children in the Fels longitudinal growth study. Int J Obes 1991; 15: 479–485.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kroke A, Manz F, Kersting M, Remer T, Sichert-Hellert W, Alexy U et al. The DONALD Study. History, current status and future perspectives. Eur J Nutr 2004; 43: 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kersting M, Alexy U, Kroke A, Lentze MJ . Nutrition of children and adolescents. Results of the DONALD Study. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2004; 47: 213–218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Buyken AE, Hahn S, Kroke A . Differences between recumbent length and stature measurement in groups of 2- and 3-y-old children and its relevance for the use of European body mass index references. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2005; 29: 24–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo SS, Huang C, Maynard LM, Demerath E, Towne B, Chumlea WC et al. Body mass index during childhood, adolescence and young adulthood in relation to adult overweight and adiposity: the Fels Longitudinal Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000; 24: 1628–1635.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Freedman DS, Kettel Khan L, Serdula MK, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS . BMI rebound, childhood height and obesity among adults: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001; 25: 543–549.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Eriksson JG, Forsen T, Tuomilehto J, Osmond C, Barker DJ . Early adiposity rebound in childhood and risk of Type 2 diabetes in adult life. Diabetologia 2003; 46: 190–194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Knittle JL, Timmers K, Ginsberg-Fellner F, Brown RE, Katz DP . The growth of adipose tissue in children and adolescents. J Clin Invest 1979; 63: 239–246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Institute of Child Nutrition, Dortmund, Germany

    A Kroke, S Hahn & A E Buyken

  2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, SC, USA

    A D Liese

Authors
  1. A Kroke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S Hahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A E Buyken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A D Liese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Kroke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kroke, A., Hahn, S., Buyken, A. et al. A comparative evaluation of two different approaches to estimating age at adiposity rebound. Int J Obes 30, 261–266 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803143

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803143

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links