Abstract
IT is never a very pleasant or gracious task to reply to criticism. When that criticism, however, is based on a misapprehension of the facts, and is consequently wrong and misleading, and is, moreover, enforced by whatever weight “authority” may carry, its correction is simplified down to a plain matter of duty. The criticism to which I refer is contained in Prof. Armstrong's address to the Chemical Society (Chem. Soc. Journ., vol. xxxix. p. 1160), which has just come before me.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
THRELFALL, R. Purification of Sulphur. Nature 54, 224–225 (1896). https://doi.org/10.1038/054224a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/054224a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
