Abstract
IN August of last year (NATURE, vol. xxxiv. p. 341), I ventured to draw a distinction between the unfossiliferous sands found at certain places on the North Downs and the fossiliferous deposits at Lenham. For reasons assigned, I suggested a certain degree of probability of their being of Bagshot age, and indicating a former extension by overlap of the higher beds of that important Eocene formation. This summer I have had opportunities of examining all the principal outliers referred to; and I must say that I am strongly impressed with the Bagshot character of these unfossiliferous sands, and of the well-rolled flint pebbles associated with them, in some cases (as at Headley) in great quantity. I speak only of those which can be identified with some degree of certainty as Tertiary beds in situ. The sands at Netley Heath and at Chipstead have a remarkable Upper Bagshot facies. Those at Headley do not present such a strong character in this respect, but I have no hesitation in referring them on lithological grounds to the Bagshot series.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
IRVING, A. Tertiary Outliers on the North Downs. Nature 36, 531–532 (1887). https://doi.org/10.1038/036531e0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/036531e0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.