Abstract
THE accompanying figure represents a fruit of Opuntia Ficus-Indica, which is wholly inclosed in one of the well-known flat branches of this plant; normally the fruits appear as exserted obovate bodies on the margin, or on either side, of the branches. The figure is exactly half natural size; the fruit is therefore full grown. There is no interruption in the ascending curves of spinous tubercles, only they are somewhat smaller on the fruit, which has also a less wrinkled skin than the remainder of the branch. It is of rather uncommon occurrence, nobody having seen here anything alike ia the extensive tunales or Indian fig-plantations of oar neighbourhood; nor have I been able to find any mention of such a case in the books at my disposal. It is evidently an instance of non-development of peduncle, a special case of suppression of axile organs (Masters, “Teratology,” p. 393). But I think it throws also some light on the nature of what generally is taken to be the pericarp of the Opuntia fruit, which, after all, seems to be a slightly modified branch, bearing the ovary of the flower in a cavity on its upper end. A similar view is held forth by Dr. Noll in a paper published in the Annual report of the Senkenbergische Gesellschaft (Frankfurt, 1872, pp. 118-121, with two plates), where he describes and figures two abnormal fruits of Opuntia coccinellifera from the Canary Islands, with branches growing from the exterior part of the fruits. Their apparent pericarp is therefore an axile organ of a certain order, say of the order n, whilst the additional branch is of the next order, n + 1. The case which forms the object of the present note is quite the reverse of those mentioned by Dr. Noll, as the branch of order n, or the exterior part of the normal fruit, is not developed independently, being represented by its parent-branch of order, n - 1.
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
ERNST, A. An Abnormal Fruit of Opuntia Ficus-Indica. Nature 27, 77 (1882). https://doi.org/10.1038/027077b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/027077b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.