Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Intellect in Brutes

Abstract

MR. HENSLOW'S question (NATURE, vol. xix. p. 433) reminds me of the celebrated carp and bucket of water problem, put by King Charles the Second. He had better have put it thus—“Did ever a person know a dog (or other animal) ring a bell to bring a servant, &c.” How can any one tell if an animal goes through any “process of reasoning,” save by the results? What will Mr. Henslow say to the following, for which I can vouch, as can others now living? For my part, having watched animals since my childhood, I am fully convinced of their “powers of reasoning” to a certain extent.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LAYARD, E. Intellect in Brutes. Nature 20, 338–339 (1879). https://doi.org/10.1038/020338d0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/020338d0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing