Abstract
Solar flares are one of the severest solar activities that have important effects on near-Earth space. Previous studies have shown that flight arrival delays increase as a result of solar flares, but the intrinsic mechanism behind this relationship is still unknown. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of flight departure delays during 57 solar X-ray events by using a huge amount of flight data (~ 5 × 106 records) gathered over a 5-year period. It is found that the average flight departure delay time during solar X-ray events increased by 20.68% (7.67 min) compared to quiet periods. Our analysis also revealed apparent time and latitude dependencies, with flight delays being more serious on the dayside than on the nightside and longer (shorter) delays tending to occur in lower (higher) latitude airports during solar X-ray events. Furthermore, our results suggest that the intensity of solar flares (soft X-ray flux) and the Solar Zenith Angle directly modulate flight departure delay time and delay rate. These results indicate that communication interferences caused by solar flares directly affect flight departure delays. This work expands our conventional understanding of the impacts of solar flares on human society and provides new insights for preventing or coping with flight delays.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Solar flares are among the severest solar phenomena, characterized by the sudden and intense release of electromagnetic energy from the sun1. They have significant impacts on the near-Earth space environment and are therefore an important subject of space weather research2,3. It has been widely recognized that solar flares can adversely affect various systems, including spacecraft operations, high-frequency (HF) radio communications4, GPS/GNSS navigation5, and air traffic control facilities6. With the development of modern science and technology, the impacts of solar flares on human society have been found to be more and more obvious. A solar flare is a sudden and intense release of energy (about 1028–1032 ergs)7,8,9 from the sun, which typically occurs within a matter of minutes to a few hours and can emit various forms of electromagnetic radiation, most notably X-rays and extreme ultraviolet10. These radiations can induce a rapid increase in ionization within the Earth's lower ionosphere, specifically the D region11,12, resulting in a series of ionospheric disturbances that can cause fading or even disruption of HF radio signals, interfering with communication and navigation systems. However aircraft communication must be available throughout the entire flight route to ensure safety13. Therefore, the impact of solar flares on commercial flights cannot be overlooked.
There have been sporadic reports of solar flares affecting flight operations. For example, in November 2015, air traffic control radar stations in Sweden experienced disruptions caused by solar flare-associated radio radiations, resulting in delays in Swedish airspace that lasted for nearly an hour6,14. Similarly, in September 2017, a series of fairly strong solar flares caused periodic impacts on HF radio users globally. The French Civil Aviation authorities reported that an aircraft equipped with non-Controller Pilot Data Link Communications equipment lost HF radio contact for approximately 90 minutes15. Additionally, some researchers found that the number of aviation catastrophes increased on the third day following an X-class solar flare16.
The impacts of solar flares on the aviation industry have been researched by various international organizations and scholars17,18. However, their focus has primarily been on safety concerns, with little attention paid to flight delays, which are a matter of significant interest to many passengers. Previous research has clearly demonstrated that flight delays can lead to significant economic losses and generate a lot of issues19,20. Therefore, there is a crucial need to investigate the relationship between solar flares and flight delays. Our previous research has suggested that flare-induced magnetospheric-ionospheric disturbances are strongly linked to flight delays21. Nevertheless, what are the distinctive characteristics of flight delays during solar flares? And what is the underlying mechanism that connects flight delays with solar flares? In this research, based on the data of solar flares from GOES satellite and huge amounts (~ 5 × 106) of flight records, the time and latitude dependency of flight delays during solar flares are revealed and the relevant potential explanations are discussed. It should be noted that our investigation on solar flares only takes into account the electromagnetic radiation emitted from the sun, but does not consider the high-energy particles that often accompany them.
Data and methods
Solar X-ray events are defined by soft X-ray (1–8 Å) fluxes from the GOES satellites, and they can be obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC). The details for determining the begin, maximum, and end times of an X-ray event can be found on the NOAA website22or in the relevant literature23. The list of solar X-ray events used in this paper is obtained from NOAA24, while unlisted events are identified by using the SWPC algorithm based on soft X-ray data obtained from the GOES satellites. According to the NOAA Space Weather Scales, solar X-ray events below class M typically do not significantly affect communications and navigation. Therefore, only M-class and X-class solar X-ray events are selected for this analysis. In this work, only independent solar X-ray events, such as the M1.8 class solar X-ray event shown in Fig. 1a, are chosen as research samples, while solar X-ray events that partially overlapped with other space weather events (e.g., coronal mass ejections or solar proton events), such as the M2.3 class solar X-ray event shown in Fig. 1a, are excluded. The begin and end times of a coronal mass ejection can be obtained from the website25, and the begin and maximum times of a solar proton event can also be obtained from database26. The end time of a solar proton event is defined as the time at which the proton flux of the GOES satellite drops below 10 pfu.
The individual flight data for this study were obtained from Travelsky Mobile Technology Limited, an affiliated company of the Civil Aviation Administration of China. The dataset contains information on operational dates, flight numbers, departure and arrival airports, as well as scheduled and actual departure and arrival times for all commercial flights between January 1st, 2015 and December 30th, 2019. The airports included in the dataset are Shenzhen Baoan International Airport (IATA: SZX) (22.64°N, 113.82°E), Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport (IATA: CAN) (23.38°N, 113.30°E), Shanghai Pudong International Airport (IATA: PVG) (31.15°N, 121.80°E), Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport (IATA: SHA) (31.19°N, 121.33°E) and Beijing Capital International Airport (IATA: PEK) (40.07°N, 116.58°E). These airports are ideal samples for analyses since they are the five largest hub airports in China, which could statistically guarantee the data homogeneity.
The present study focuses on the departure delay as the research object, which is defined as the time difference between the actual departure time and the scheduled departure time of a flight. It has been previously demonstrated that there exists a linear correlation between the arrival delay and departure delay27,28. In addition, our previous study21 has examined the effect of space weather on arrival delays, which can be contrasted with the present work. Thus, the focus of the current analysis is on the departure delay rather than the arrival delay.
It is important to note that flight delays exhibit intrinsic characteristics, including being influenced by various contingencies and having inherent periods. Therefore, to accurately determine the impact of solar flares on flight delays, these factors need to be carefully considered. Flight delays are highly complex, nonlinear, and interrelated, so the research samples should be large enough to smear out those various contingencies as much as possible. To eliminate the influence of accidents, a comparative study similar to Mitsokapas et al.29 was adopted, but with a larger research sample size (~ 5 × 106 records over 5 years). It is worth noting that the selected solar X-ray events were randomly distributed across weekdays and months, thereby minimizing the influence of weekday and season effects on the results21. Nevertheless, the fact that flight delays exhibit a 24-h intrinsic period is one of the most important factors considered in this study21. The “24-h intrinsic period” is that flight delays vary significantly at different moments of the day30,31,32. To eliminate such influence, flights departure within the 24-h-period after the onset of the solar X-ray events are defined as the solar X-ray events affected flights, as marked in red (III) and shown in Fig. 1d. Correspondingly, we excluded the nearby flight data (II and IV) since they did not span an entire day (from 00:00 LT to 24:00 LT), as illustrated in green in Fig. 1d. In addition, we excluded scheduled departure flights during coronal mass ejections or solar proton events (VII and VIII), as indicated in green in Fig. 1d. Moreover, if multiple solar X-ray events occur within 24 h, we only take into account the flight data for the first solar X-ray event within the selected range. Finally, scheduled departure flights that were not disrupted by solar X-ray events, coronal mass ejections, or solar proton events are retained as flight data for quiet periods (I, V, VI and IX), as highlighted in blue in Fig. 1d.
For the analysis in this study, a total of 52 solar X-ray events and 5,295,347 individual flight records (1,751,250 records are filtered out) were selected from January 1st, 2015 to December 30th, 2019. It should be noted that all the cancelled flights are removed from our dataset for the entire study, since the percentage of such flights (86,997 records) is too small to impact the final results.
Results
Solar flares can have varied effects on Earth, depending on several factors such as the local time (geographical longitude), geographical latitude, flare intensity, and Solar Zenith Angle (SZA)33,34,35. If the increased flight delay time during solar X-ray events is due to solar flares rather than statistical coincidences, the delay time should reveal some distinct features related to solar flares. Identifying such features would facilitate a better understanding of the causal relationship between solar flares and flight delays.
To comprehensively assess the impacts of solar X-ray events on flight departure delays, it is essential to compute the empirical probability density function (PDF) of flight departure delays based on all individual flight data in all airports, as shown in Fig. 2a. Our analysis reveals that flight delays statistics during solar X-ray events are shifted to the right compared to quiet periods, indicating an overall larger delay time. The average delay time during solar X-ray events is 44.75 min (median: 25 min), which is 7.67 min (median: 5 min) longer than during quiet periods. These findings demonstrate that flight departure delays will increase during solar X-ray events, consistent with our previous study on arrival delays21.
The longitudinal effect (local time) is a key factor that affects the Earth's response to solar flares33. Theoretically, the impact of solar flares on the Earth is mainly concentrated in the subsolar point and varies smoothly with the cosine of SZA36,37. It can be inferred that during solar flares, HF radio absorption will be more prominent in the dayside ionosphere compared to the nightside ionosphere, where little absorption is expected. Consequently, solar flares can severely disrupt communications and navigation on the dayside, while having little effect on the nightside. However, in this study, the longitudinal variations among the airports are minor, which makes it difficult to directly investigate the longitudinal effect of the flare on flight delays. To reveal the longitudinal effect, all the solar X-ray events affected flights were further categorized into two groups based on the onset of the solar X-ray events: the "Dayside Group" included events that began between 06:00 (LT) and 18:00 (LT), and the remaining events comprised the "Nightside Group". It is worth noting that, no matter when solar X-ray events occur, each group covers all flight data for a full 24-h-period, and it was crucial in removing the hourly delay difference introduced by the “24-h intrinsic period”30,31,32.
Figure 2b illustrates the PDF of flight departure delays during 33 solar X-ray events in the "Dayside Group" and 19 solar X-ray events in the "Nightside Group". Two obvious characteristics can be observed in the figure. Firstly, the average flight delay time during solar X-ray events, regardless in nightside group or dayside group, is larger than that during quiet periods. As solar X-ray events can last for several hours and aviation activities require time to respond, such circumstances may partially account for the increased delay time for the nightside group. Secondly, the delay statistics for the dayside group exhibit a rightward shift compared to those for the nightside group, indicating larger overall delays. These results confirm our expectation that flight delays in the dayside group were more severe than those in the nightside group. Therefore, the above results also suggest that the solar X-ray events affected flight delays reveal obvious time dependency.
Finally, it is noteworthy that latitude is also an important factor that controls the effects of solar flares on Earth34,36. As the investigated airports are located in similar longitudes but varying in latitudes, they provide an excellent opportunity to examine the latitude effect. Based on their geographical coordinates, the five airports were classified into three categories: the higher latitude airport, PEK; the middle latitude airport, SHA and PVG; and the lower latitude airport, CAN and SZX. It has been known that solar flares tend to have a more pronounced impact on regions closer to the equator, in contrast to higher latitudes, as revealed by previous research38,39. The adverse effects of solar flares on various communication and navigation systems are generally more severe in lower latitude areas. This feature is expected to result in comparatively longer flight delays in lower latitude airport and shorter delays in higher latitude airport.
The departure delay PDF for three types of airports during both quiet periods and solar X-ray events are illustrated in Fig. 3a, b, and c. It is evident that the flight average delay time during solar X-ray events decreases from lower to higher latitude airports with values of 46.67, 45.57, and 41.35 min (with median values of 26, 27, 24 min), respectively. Meanwhile, the average delays during quiet periods remain nearly unchanged at ~ 37 min. The latitude effect of flight delays is clearly revealed, as the lower latitude airports consistently exhibit higher delays. The relative difference in delay time between the solar X-ray events and quiet periods, as presented in Fig. 3d, can be interpreted as the net increase in delay time caused by solar X-ray events. Notably, the net increase in average delay time also shows a smooth change with latitude (10.33 min near ~ 23°N, 7.71 min near ~ 31°N and 4.51 min near ~ 40°N), and the change rate is approximately 0.35 min/degree. These findings provide compelling evidence that the impact of solar X-ray events on flight delays varies significantly by latitude, which is also consistent with expectations.
Discussions and conclusions
It is crucial to eliminate various interference factors to obtain statistically valid results on the effect of solar flares on flight delays. Although we have removed the influence of additional major space weather events, such as coronal mass ejections and solar proton events, there may still be some measurable solar effects that could contaminate the "quiet periods" in our analyses. However, these "contaminations" can only underestimate the impact of solar flares on flight delays21, which does not change the overall conclusions. Besides, to ensure that there are indeed differences in flight delays, we conducted the two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test on the "quiet periods" and various "solar X-ray event periods" shown in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively. All the calculated critical values indicate that the distributions of the referred flight delays during "quiet periods" and various "solar X-ray event periods" are indeed different, with a significance level of 0.05.
Our previous study has indicated that solar flares can have an impact on flight arrival delays, which are highly correlated with magnetospheric-ionospheric disturbances21. Our findings suggest that departure delays associated with solar X-ray events are also similar to arrival delays. Furthermore, the observed time and latitude dependency of departure delay time strongly implies that there is a causal relationship between solar X-ray events and flight delays, rather than just coincidental effects. To investigate the underlying mechanism that links flight delays and solar flares, we will focus on the intensity of the solar flares and the SZA.
The intensity of solar flares, represented by the soft X-ray flux, is a critical factor in determining their effects on Earth. It is known that the flare associated effects on Earth would be more significant if the flux intensity is more intense. Moreover, the effects of solar flares on Earth are not solely dependent on the X-ray flux but also on the SZA. Many researchers have considered the influence of SZA when investigating the impacts of solar flares on human activities34,40. The DRAP model36 is often used to estimate flare-associated HF radio absorption, and the Highest Affected Frequency (HAF) is introduced to determine the highest frequency affected by the absorption of 1 dB due to solar X-ray flux41.
where the flux represents the soft X-ray flux and χ is the SZA. The HAF is an empirical formula that can be used to simply evaluate the interferences of HF communication caused by solar flares. Obviously, the higher X-ray flux and the smaller SZA will lead to more significant consequences.
Figure 4 shows the flight departure delay time and delay rate as a function of HAF during solar X-ray events, averaged over five airports. It is observed that the delay time and delay rate exhibit a rough increase as the HAF value increases. When the HAF is relatively small, gentle increases or fluctuations in flight delays are found. However, the most notable finding is that the growth rate of both the delay time and delay rate are increased dramatically when the HAF exceeds 5 MHz. This result further verifies the effects of solar X-ray events on flight delays and suggests that solar X-ray events associated interferences in HF communication should be the most probable reason accounting for the increased flight delays. In summary, this study examines the unique characteristics of flight delays during solar X-ray events and aims to establish the underlying relationships between them. The results reveal that the average departure delay time for flights in all airports during solar X-ray events is 7.67 min (20.68%) longer compared to those during quiet periods. The study also identified a time dependency, with longer (shorter) flight delays occurring at the dayside (nightside) during solar X-ray events. Furthermore, our analysis identifies a latitude dependency, whereby lower (higher) latitude airports experience longer (shorter) delays during solar X-ray events. We also investigate the factors that contribute to flight delays during solar X-ray events by examining the relationship between the HAF and flight delays. It is indicated that both the soft X-ray flux and the SZA play important roles in flight delays. These findings demonstrate that communication interferences caused by solar X-ray events directly affect flight departure delays. This work extends our conventional understanding of solar flares, and it could also provide us with brand new views to help improve the flight delay predications.
Data availability
The intact flight data that used in this study are available from Travelsky Mobile Technology Limited but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. The data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Civil Aviation Administration of China.
References
Hannah, I. G. et al. Microflares and the statistics of X-ray flares. Space Sci. Rev. 159, 263–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-010-9705-4 (2011).
Singh, A. K., Siingh, D. & Singh, R. P. Space weather: Physics, effects and predictability. Surv. Geophys. 31, 581–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-010-9103-1 (2010).
Liu, J. et al. Solar flare effects in the Earth’s magnetosphere. Nat. Phys. 17, 807–812. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01203-5 (2021).
Yasyukevich, Y. et al. The 6 September 2017 X-class solar flares and their impacts on the ionosphere, GNSS, and HF radio wave propagation. Space Weather 16, 1013–1027. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018sw001932 (2018).
Berdermann, J. et al. Ionospheric response to the X9.3 flare on 6 September 2017 and its implication for navigation services over Europe. Space Weather 16, 1604–1615. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW001933 (2018).
Marque, C. et al. Solar radio emission as a disturbance of aeronautical radionavigation. J. Space Weather Space Clim. 8, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2018029 (2018).
Emslie, A. G., Dennis, B. R., Holman, G. D. & Hudson, H. S. Refinements to flare energy estimates: A followup to '”Energy partition in two solar flare/CME events” by A. G. Emslie et al. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 110, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005ja011305 (2005).
Hudson, H. S. Global properties of solar flares. Space Sci. Rev. 158, 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-010-9721-4 (2011).
Aschwanden, M. J. et al. Global energetics of solar flares. V. Energy closure in flares and coronal mass ejections. Astrophys. J. 836, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/17 (2017).
Mendillo, M., Withers, P., Hinson, D., Rishbeth, H. & Reinisch, B. Effects of solar flares on the ionosphere of mars. Science 311, 1135–1138. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1122099 (2006).
Thomson, N. R., Rodger, C. J. & Clilverd, M. A. Large solar flares and their ionospheric D region enhancements. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 110, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005ja011008 (2005).
Quan, L., Cai, B., Hu, X., Xu, Q. & Li, L. Study of ionospheric D region changes during solar flares using MF radar measurements. Adv. Space Res. 67, 715–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2020.10.015 (2021).
Jonas, S., Mccarron, E. & Murtagh, W. Space weather policy and effects. Insight 19, 20–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/inst.12121 (2016).
Redmon, R., Seaton, D., Steenburgh, R., Jing, H. & Rodriguez, J. September 2017’s geoeffective space weather and impacts to Caribbean radio communications during hurricane response. Space Weather 16, 1190–1201. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018SW001897 (2018).
Kalinin, Y. K. & Lukyanova, R. Y. Feed in civil aviation accidents due heliogeophysical disturbances. Events of the first half of April 2010. Geliogeofizicheskie Issledovaniya 87–102 (2014).
ICAO. Manual on Space Weather Information in Support of International Air Navigation (2018).
UK CAA. CAP 1428: Impacts of space weather on aviation (2020).
Ferguson, J., Kara, A. Q., Hoffman, K. & Sherry, L. Estimating domestic US airline cost of delay based on European model. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 33, 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2011.10.003 (2013).
Zou, B. & Hansen, M. Flight delay impact on airfare and flight frequency: A comprehensive assessment. Transp. Res. Part E 69, 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2014.05.016 (2014).
Wang, Y. et al. Additional flight delays and magnetospheric–ionospheric disturbances during solar storms. Sci. Rep. 13, 3246. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30424-2 (2023).
Plutino, N., Berrilli, F., Del Moro, D. & Giovannelli, L. A new catalogue of solar flare events from soft X-ray GOES signal in the period 1986–2020. Adv. Space Res. 71, 2048–2058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.11.020 (2023).
https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/space-weather/solar-data/solar-features/solar-flares/x-rays/goes/xrs/
http://www.srl.caltech.edu/ACE/ASC/DATA/level3/icmetable2.htm
Wong, J.-T. & Tsai, S.-C. A survival model for flight delay propagation. J. Air Transp. Manag. 23, 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2012.01.016 (2012).
Cao, Y., Zhu, C., Wang, Y. & Li, Q. A Method of reducing flight delay by exploring internal mechanism of flight delays. J. Adv. Transp. 2019, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7069380 (2019).
Mitsokapas, E., Schfer, B., Harris, R. & Beck, C. Statistical characterization of airplane delays. Sci. Rep. 11, 7855. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87279-8 (2021).
Morisset, T. & Odoni, A. Capacity, delay, and schedule reliability at major airports in Europe and the United States. Transp. Res. Rec. 2214, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.3141/2214-11 (2011).
Proença, H. M., Klijn, R., Bäck, T. & Leeuwen, M. V. Identifying flight delay patterns using diverse subgroup discovery. In 2018 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI.2018.8628933 (2018).
Pamplona, D. A. & Jorge, C. An overview of air delay: A case study of the Brazilian scenario. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 7, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100189 (2020).
Zhang, D. H. & Xiao, Z. Study of the ionospheric TEC using GPS during the large solar flare burst on Nov 6, 1997. Chin. Sci. Bull. 45, 1749–1752. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02886258 (2000).
Zhang, D. H., Xiao, Z., Igarashi, K. & Ma, G. Y. GPS-derived ionospheric total electron content response to a solar flare that occurred on 14 July 2000. Radio Sci. 37, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001rs002542 (2002).
Meza, A., Van Zele, M. A. & Rovira, M. Solar flare effect on the geomagnetic field and ionosphere. J. Atmos. Solar Terr. Phys. 71, 1322–1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.05.015 (2009).
https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/d-region-absorption-predictions-d-rap
Qian, L. et al. Solar flare and geomagnetic storm effects on the thermosphere and ionosphere during 6–11 September 2017. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 124, 2298–2311. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ja026175 (2019).
Qian, L. Y., Burns, A. G., Chamberlin, P. C. & Solomon, S. C. Variability of thermosphere and ionosphere responses to solar flares. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 116, A10309. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011ja016777 (2011).
Pettit, J. et al. Effects of the September 2005 solar flares and solar proton events on the middle atmosphere in WACCM. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 123, 5747–5763. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ja025294 (2018).
Wan, W., Liu, L., Yuan, H., Ning, B. & Zhang, S. The GPS measured SITEC caused by the very intense solar flare on July 14, 2000. Adv. Space Res. 36, 2465–2469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2004.01.027 (2005).
Schumer, E. A. Improved Modeling of Midlatitude D-Region Ionospheric Absorption of High Frequency Radio Signals During Solar X-Ray Flares. Ph.D. Dissertation thesis, United States Air Force, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (2010).
Acknowledgements
This work is jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41731067 and 42174199), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2021A1515012581 and 2023B1515040021), Shenzhen Technology Project (GXWD20201230155427003-20200804210238001 and RCJC20210609104422048), and Shenzhen Key Laboratory Launching Project (No. ZDSYS20210702140800001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
X.H.X and Y.W. wrote the main manuscript text. X.H.X and Y.W. prepared the figures. F.S.W., X.S.F., B.Y.W., Y.S.H., Z.L., J.P.G., P.B.Z., C.W.J., X.J.X., Z.L.Z., and P.Z. helped analyze the space weather events. M.H.B., H.W.T., D.S.W., and L.B. prepared the flight data. W.Y.Z. participated in the writing of the analytical procedures. All authors discussed the scientific results and reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, X.H., Wang, Y., Wei, F.S. et al. Characteristics of flight delays during solar flares. Sci Rep 13, 6101 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33306-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33306-9
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.