Abstract
Dielectric electrostatic capacitors1, because of their ultrafast charge–discharge, are desirable for high-power energy storage applications. Along with ultrafast operation, on-chip integration can enable miniaturized energy storage devices for emerging autonomous microelectronics and microsystems2,3,4,5. Moreover, state-of-the-art miniaturized electrochemical energy storage systems—microsupercapacitors and microbatteries—currently face safety, packaging, materials and microfabrication challenges preventing on-chip technological readiness2,3,6, leaving an opportunity for electrostatic microcapacitors. Here we report record-high electrostatic energy storage density (ESD) and power density, to our knowledge, in HfO2–ZrO2-based thin film microcapacitors integrated into silicon, through a three-pronged approach. First, to increase intrinsic energy storage, atomic-layer-deposited antiferroelectric HfO2–ZrO2 films are engineered near a field-driven ferroelectric phase transition to exhibit amplified charge storage by the negative capacitance effect7,8,9,10,11,12, which enhances volumetric ESD beyond the best-known back-end-of-the-line-compatible dielectrics (115 J cm−3) (ref. 13). Second, to increase total energy storage, antiferroelectric superlattice engineering14 scales the energy storage performance beyond the conventional thickness limitations of HfO2–ZrO2-based (anti)ferroelectricity15 (100-nm regime). Third, to increase the storage per footprint, the superlattices are conformally integrated into three-dimensional capacitors, which boosts the areal ESD nine times and the areal power density 170 times that of the best-known electrostatic capacitors: 80 mJ cm−2 and 300 kW cm−2, respectively. This simultaneous demonstration of ultrahigh energy density and power density overcomes the traditional capacity–speed trade-off across the electrostatic–electrochemical energy storage hierarchy1,16. Furthermore, the integration of ultrahigh-density and ultrafast-charging thin films within a back-end-of-the-line-compatible process enables monolithic integration of on-chip microcapacitors5, which can unlock substantial energy storage and power delivery performance for electronic microsystems17,18,19.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data supporting the findings of this study are available in the paper and the Supplementary Information.
References
Hao, X. A review on the dielectric materials for high energy-storage application. J. Adv. Dielectr. 3, 1330001 (2013).
Kyeremateng, N. A., Brousse, T. & Pech, D. Microsupercapacitors as miniaturized energy-storage components for on-chip electronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 7–15 (2017).
Zhu, M. & Schmidt, O. G. Tiny robots and sensors need tiny batteries — here’s how to do it. Nature 589, 195–197 (2021).
Aubin, C. A. et al. Towards enduring autonomous robots via embodied energy. Nature 602, 393–402 (2022).
Li, Y. et al. On-chip batteries for dust-sized computers. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2103641 (2022).
Gogotsi, Y. & Simon, P. True performance metrics in electrochemical energy storage. Science 334, 917–918 (2011).
Salahuddin, S. & Datta, S. Use of negative capacitance to provide voltage amplification for low power nanoscale devices. Nano Lett. 8, 405–410 (2008).
Khan, A. I. et al. Experimental evidence of ferroelectric negative capacitance in nanoscale heterostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 113501 (2011).
Zubko, P. et al. Negative capacitance in multidomain ferroelectric superlattices. Nature 534, 524–528 (2016).
Yadav, A. K. et al. Spatially resolved steady-state negative capacitance. Nature 565, 468–471 (2019).
Cheema, S. S. et al. Ultrathin ferroic HfO2–ZrO2 superlattice gate stack for advanced transistors. Nature 604, 65–71 (2022).
Íñiguez, J., Zubko, P., Luk’yanchuk, I. & Cano, A. Ferroelectric negative capacitance. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 243–256 (2019).
Ali, F. et al. Fluorite-structured ferroelectric-/antiferroelectric-based electrostatic nanocapacitors for energy storage applications. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3, 6036–6055 (2020).
Ramesh, R. & Schlom, D. G. Creating emergent phenomena in oxide superlattices. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 257–268 (2019).
Schroeder, U., Park, M. H., Mikolajick, T. & Hwang, C. S. The fundamentals and applications of ferroelectric HfO2. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 653–669 (2022).
Whittingham, M. S. History, evolution, and future status of energy storage. Proc. IEEE 100, 1518–1534 (2012).
Sarjeant, W. J., Clelland, I. W. & Price, R. A. Capacitive components for power electronics. Proc. IEEE 89, 846–855 (2001).
Chandrakasan, A. P., Daly, D. C., Kwong, J. & Ramadass, Y. K. Next generation micro-power systems. In 2008 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits, 2–5 (IEEE, 2008).
Faber, H. & Anthopoulos, T. D. Adding a new layer to ‘more than Moore’. Nat. Electron. 2, 497–498 (2019).
Yang, L. et al. Perovskite lead-free dielectrics for energy storage applications. Prog. Mater Sci. 102, 72–108 (2019).
Park, M. H. et al. Ferroelectricity and antiferroelectricity of doped thin HfO2-based films. Adv. Mater. 27, 1811–1831 (2015).
Park, M. H. & Hwang, C. S. Fluorite-structure antiferroelectrics. Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 124502 (2019).
Wei, Y. et al. A rhombohedral ferroelectric phase in epitaxially strained Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 thin films. Nat. Mater. 17, 1095–1100 (2018).
Cheema, S. S. et al. Enhanced ferroelectricity in ultrathin films grown directly on silicon. Nature 580, 478–482 (2020).
Lee, H.-J. et al. Scale-free ferroelectricity induced by flat phonon bands in HfO2. Science 369, 1343–1347 (2020).
Cheema, S. S. et al. Emergent ferroelectricity in subnanometer binary oxide films on silicon. Science 376, 648–652 (2022).
Schlom, D. G., Guha, S. & Datta, S. Gate oxides beyond SiO2. MRS Bull. 33, 1017–1025 (2008).
Lederer, M., Lehninger, D., Ali, T. & Kämpfe, T. Review on the microstructure of ferroelectric hafnium oxides. Phys. Status Solidi Rapid Res. Lett. 16, 2200168 (2022).
Hsain, H. A. et al. Many routes to ferroelectric HfO2: a review of current deposition methods. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 40, 010803 (2022).
Khan, A. I., Keshavarzi, A. & Datta, S. The future of ferroelectric field-effect transistor technology. Nat. Electron. 3, 588–597 (2020).
Noheda, B., Nukala, P. & Acuautla, M. Lessons from hafnium dioxide-based ferroelectrics. Nat. Mater. 22, 562–569 (2023).
Nukala, P. et al. Reversible oxygen migration and phase transitions in hafnia-based ferroelectric devices. Science 372, 630–635 (2021).
Park, M. H. et al. Thin HfxZr1−xO2 films: a new lead-free system for electrostatic supercapacitors with large energy storage density and robust thermal stability. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1400610 (2014).
Reyes-Lillo, S. E., Garrity, K. F. & Rabe, K. M. Antiferroelectricity in thin-film ZrO2 from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 90, 140103 (2014).
Khan, A. I. et al. Negative capacitance in a ferroelectric capacitor. Nat. Mater. 14, 182–186 (2015).
Hoffmann, M. et al. Negative capacitance for electrostatic supercapacitors. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1901154 (2019).
Hoffmann, M. et al. Antiferroelectric negative capacitance from a structural phase transition in zirconia. Nat. Commun. 13, 1228 (2022).
Qiao, L. et al. Observation of negative capacitance in antiferroelectric PbZrO3 films. Nat. Commun. 12, 4215 (2021).
Li, F., Zhang, S., Damjanovic, D., Chen, L.-Q. & Shrout, T. R. Local structural heterogeneity and electromechanical responses of ferroelectrics: learning from relaxor ferroelectrics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1801504 (2018).
Keshavarzi, A., Ni, K., Van Den Hoek, W., Datta, S. & Raychowdhury, A. FerroElectronics for edge intelligence. IEEE Micro 40, 33–48 (2020).
Strnad, N. A. et al. Extending atomic layer deposition for use in next-generation piezoMEMS: Review and perspective. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 41, 050801 (2023).
Martin, L. W., Maria, J. P. & Schlom, D. G. Lifting the fog in ferroelectric thin-film synthesis. Nat. Mater. 23, 9–10 (2024).
Pešić, M., Hoffmann, M., Richter, C., Mikolajick, T. & Schroeder, U. Nonvolatile random access memory and energy storage based on antiferroelectric like hysteresis in ZrO2. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 7486–7494 (2016).
Kühnel, K., Czernohorsky, M., Mart, C. & Weinreich, W. High-density energy storage in Si-doped hafnium oxide thin films on area-enhanced substrates. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 37, 021401 (2019).
Viegas, A., Mart, C. & Czernohorsky, M. Antiferroelectric Si:HfO2 for high energy storage using 3D MIM capacitors. In 2020 Joint Conference of the IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium and International Symposium on Applications of Ferroelectrics (IFCS-ISAF) 1–3 (IEEE, 2020).
He, Y. et al. Superhigh energy storage density on-chip capacitors with ferroelectric Hf0.5Zr0.5O2/antiferroelectric Hf0.25Zr0.75O2 bilayer nanofilms fabricated by plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition. Nanoscale Adv. 4, 4648–4657 (2022).
Zhang, Y. et al. 3D HfO2 thin film MEMS capacitor with superior energy storage properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2305733 (2023).
Viegas, A. E., Kuehnel, K., Mart, C., Czernohorsky, M. & Heitmann, J. Stabilizing antiferroelectric-like aluminum-doped hafnium oxide for energy storage capacitors. Adv. Eng. Mater. 25, 2300443 (2023).
Zheng, G. et al. Plasma-enhanced atomic layer-deposited Ti,Si-doped ZrO2 antiferroelectric films for energy storage capacitors. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 5, 5907–5915 (2023).
Hanrahan, B. et al. Pyroelectric energy conversion in doped hafnium oxide (HfO2) thin films on area-enhanced substrates. Energy Technol. 7, 1900515 (2019).
Böscke, T. S., Müller, J., Bräuhaus, D., Schröder, U. & Böttger, U. Ferroelectricity in hafnium oxide thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 102903 (2011).
Böscke, T. S. et al. Phase transitions in ferroelectric silicon doped hafnium oxide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 112904 (2011).
Müller, J. et al. Ferroelectricity in yttrium-doped hafnium oxide. J. Appl. Phys. 110, 114113 (2011).
Ruh, R., Garrett, H. J., Domagala, R. F. & Tallan, N. M. The Svstern Zirconia-Hafnia. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 51, 23–28 (1968).
Müller, J. et al. Ferroelectricity in simple binary ZrO2 and HfO2. Nano Lett. 12, 4318–4323 (2012).
Wang, Z. et al. Antiferroelectricity in lanthanum doped zirconia without metallic capping layers and post-deposition/-metallization anneals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 222902 (2018).
Lombardo, S. et al. Atomic-scale imaging of polarization switching in an (anti)ferroelectric memory material: Zirconia (ZrO2). In 2020 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology, 1–2 (IEEE, 2020).
Tasneem, N. et al. A Janovec-Kay-Dunn-like behavior at thickness scaling in ultra-thin antiferroelectric ZrO2 films. Adv. Electron. Mater. 7, 2100485 (2021).
Zheng, Y. et al. In-situ atomic visualization of structural transformation in Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 ferroelectric thin film: from nonpolar tetragonal phase to polar orthorhombic phase. In 2021 Symposium on VLSI Technology, T16–3 (IEEE, 2021).
Park, J. Y. et al. A perspective on the physical scaling down of hafnia-based ferroelectrics. Nanotechnology 34, 202001 (2023).
Park, J. Y. et al. Engineering strategies in emerging fluorite-structured ferroelectrics. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 4, 1369–1380 (2022).
Kim, H. J. et al. Grain size engineering for ferroelectric Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 films by an insertion of Al2O3 interlayer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 192903 (2014).
Gao, W. et al. Room-temperature negative capacitance in a ferroelectric–dielectric superlattice heterostructure. Nano Lett. 14, 5814–5819 (2014).
Das, S. et al. Local negative permittivity and topological phase transition in polar skyrmions. Nat. Mater. 20, 194–201 (2021).
Graf, M., Aramberri, H., Zubko, P. & Íñiguez, J. Giant voltage amplification from electrostatically induced incipient ferroelectric states. Nat. Mater. 21, 1252–1257 (2022).
Qiao, L., Song, C., Wang, Q., Zhou, Y. & Pan, F. Constructing an overall static negative capacitance effect via energy landscape designing. Adv. Electron. Mater. 8, 2200644 (2022).
Doherty, J., Lynch, K. A. & Ponomareva, I. Negative capacitance regime in antiferroelectric PbZrO3. J. Appl. Phys. 132, 034101 (2022).
Neumayer, S. M. et al. Alignment of polarization against an electric field in van der Waals ferroelectrics. Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 064063 (2020).
Neumayer, S. M. et al. The concept of negative capacitance in ionically conductive van der waals ferroelectrics. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 2001726 (2020).
Braga, M. H., Oliveira, J. E., Murchison, A. J. & Goodenough, J. B. Performance of a ferroelectric glass electrolyte in a self-charging electrochemical cell with negative capacitance and resistance. Appl. Phys. Rev. 7, 011406 (2020).
Guy, J. G. M. et al. Anomalous motion of charged domain walls and associated negative capacitance in copper–chlorine boracite. Adv. Mater. 33, 2008068 (2021).
Li, X. et al. Duality of switching mechanisms and transient negative capacitance in improper ferroelectrics. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.14639 (2023).
Feng, Z.-J. et al. First observation of negative capacitance in molecular ferroelectric thin films. Adv. Mater. 36, 2307518 (2024).
Caretta, L. et al. Non-volatile electric-field control of inversion symmetry. Nat. Mater. 22, 207–215 (2023).
Mundy, J. A. et al. Liberating a hidden antiferroelectric phase with interfacial electrostatic engineering. Sci. Adv. 8, eabg5860 (2022).
Jiang, Z., Xu, B., Xiang, H. & Bellaiche, L. Ultrahigh energy storage density in epitaxial AlN/ScN superlattices. Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, L072401 (2021).
Mart, C. et al. Energy harvesting in the back-end of line with CMOS compatible ferroelectric hafnium oxide. In 2020 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 1–4 (IEEE, 2020).
Deng, S. et al. BEOL compatible oxide power transistors for on-chip voltage conversion in heterogenous 3D (H3D) integrated circuits. In 2023 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 1–4 (IEEE, 2023).
Veloso, A. et al. Backside power delivery: game changer and key enabler of advanced logic scaling and new STCO opportunities. In 2023 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 19.2.1–19.2.4 (IEEE, 2023).
Salanne, M. et al. Efficient storage mechanisms for building better supercapacitors. Nat. Energy 1, 16070 (2016).
Lethien, C., Le Bideau, J. & Brousse, T. Challenges and prospects of 3D micro-supercapacitors for powering the internet of things. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 96–115 (2019).
Simon, P. & Gogotsi, Y. Perspectives for electrochemical capacitors and related devices. Nat. Mater. 19, 1151–1163 (2020).
Xia, Q. et al. All-solid-state thin film lithium/lithium-ion microbatteries for powering the internet of things. Adv. Mater. 35, 2200538 (2023).
Miller, J. R. & Simon, P. Electrochemical capacitors for energy management. Science 321, 651–652 (2008).
Gargini, P., Balestra, F. & Hayashi, Y. Roadmapping of nanoelectronics for the new electronics industry. Appl. Sci. 12, 308 (2021).
Grimley, E. D. & LeBeau, J. M. in Ferroelectricity in Doped Hafnium Oxide: Materials, Properties and Devices (eds Schroeder, U. et al.) 317–340 (Elsevier, 2019).
Jia, C. L., Lentzen, M. & Urban, K. Atomic-resolution imaging of oxygen in perovskite ceramics. Science 299, 870–873 (2003).
Jia, C. L., Houben, L., Thust, A. & Barthel, J. On the benefit of the negative-spherical-aberration imaging technique for quantitative HRTEM. Ultramicroscopy 110, 500–505 (2010).
Du, H. et al. Multiple polarization orders in individual twinned colloidal nanocrystals of centrosymmetric HfO2. Matter 4, 986–1000 (2021).
Nukala, P. et al. In situ heating studies on temperature-induced phase transitions in epitaxial Hf0.5Zr0.5O2/La0.67Sr0.33MnO3 heterostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 062901 (2021).
Pryor, A.Jr, Ophus, C. & Miao, J. A streaming multi-GPU implementation of image simulation algorithms for scanning transmission electron microscopy. Adv. Struct. Chem. Imaging 3, 15 (2017).
Ophus, C. A fast image simulation algorithm for scanning transmission electron microscopy. Adv. Struct. Chem. Imaging 3, 13 (2017).
Rangel DaCosta, L. et al. Prismatic 2.0 – Simulation software for scanning and high resolution transmission electron microscopy (STEM and HRTEM). Micron 151, 103141 (2021).
Urban, K. W. et al. Negative spherical aberration ultrahigh-resolution imaging in corrected transmission electron microscopy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 367, 3735–3753 (2009).
Sang, X., Grimley, E. D., Schenk, T., Schroeder, U. & LeBeau, J. M. On the structural origins of ferroelectricity in HfO2 thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 162905 (2015).
Hyun, S. D. et al. Field-induced ferroelectric Hf1−xZrxO2 thin films for high-k dynamic random access memory. Adv. Electron. Mater. 6, 2000631 (2020).
Kim, Y. J. et al. Time-dependent negative capacitance effects in Al2O3/BaTiO3 bilayers. Nano Lett. 16, 4375–4381 (2016).
Wang, G. et al. Effects of phase transition on the dynamic discharge energy density of antiferroelectric ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 107, 3159–3169 (2023).
Liu, G., Zhang, S., Jiang, W. & Cao, W. Losses in ferroelectric materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 89, 1–48 (2015).
Palumbo, F. et al. A review on dielectric breakdown in thin dielectrics: silicon dioxide, high-k, and layered dielectrics. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1900657 (2020).
Auciello, O., Scott, J. F. & Ramesh, R. The physics of ferroelectric memories. Phys. Today 51, 22–27 (1998).
Ramesh, R., Aggarwal, S. & Auciello, O. Science and technology of ferroelectric films and heterostructures for non-volatile ferroelectric memories. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 32, 191–236 (2001).
Haratipour, N. et al. Hafnia-based FeRAM: a path toward ultra-high density for next-generation high- speed embedded memory. In 2022 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 6.7.1–6.7.4 (IEEE, 2022).
Ramaswamy, N. et al. NVDRAM: a 32 GB dual layer 3D stacked non-volatile ferroelectric memory with near-DRAM performance for demanding AI workloads. In 2023 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), 15.7.1–15.7.4 (IEEE, 2023).
Chiu, F.-C. A review on conduction mechanisms in dielectric films. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2014, 578168 (2014).
Pan, H. et al. Enhancements of dielectric and energy storage performances in lead-free films with sandwich architecture. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 102, 936–943 (2019).
Ihlefeld, J. F. et al. Compositional dependence of linear and nonlinear optical response in crystalline hafnium zirconium oxide thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 128, 034101 (2020).
Riedel, S., Polakowski, P. & Müller, J. A thermally robust and thickness independent ferroelectric phase in laminated hafnium zirconium oxide. AIP Adv. 6, 095123 (2016).
Ni, K. et al. A novel ferroelectric superlattice based multi-level cell non-volatile memory. In 2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 28.8.1–28.8.4 (IEEE, 2019).
Ali, T. et al. A multilevel FeFET memory device based on laminated HSO and HZO ferroelectric layers for high-density storage. In 2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 28.7.1–28.7.4 (IEEE, 2019).
Aabrar, K. A. et al. BEOL compatible superlattice ferroFET-based high precision analog weight cell with superior linearity and symmetry. In 2021 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) Vol. 2, 19.6.1–19.6.4 (IEEE, 2021).
Tharpe, T., Hershkovitz, E., Hakim, F., Kim, H. & Tabrizian, R. Nanoelectromechanical resonators for gigahertz frequency control based on hafnia–zirconia–alumina superlattices. Nat. Electron. 6, 599–609 (2023).
Hakim, F., Rudawski, N. G., Tharpe, T. & Tabrizian, R. A ferroelectric-gate fin microwave acoustic spectral processor. Nat. Electron. 7, 147–156 (2024).
Antoja-Lleonart, J. et al. Atomic layer deposition of SiO2–GeO2 multilayers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 041601 (2020).
Yi, S.-H., Lin, H.-C. & Chen, M.-J. Ultra-high energy storage density and scale-up of antiferroelectric TiO2/ZrO2/TiO2 stacks for supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 9081–9091 (2021).
Lombardo, S. F. et al. Local epitaxial-like templating effects and grain size distribution in atomic layer deposited Hf0.5Zr0.5O2 thin film ferroelectric capacitors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 092901 (2021).
Chae, K. et al. Local epitaxial templating effects in ferroelectric and antiferroelectric ZrO2. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 36771–36780 (2022).
Kisi, E. H., Howard, C. J. & Hill, R. J. Crystal structure of orthorhombic zirconia in partially stabilized zirconia. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 1757–1760 (1989).
Chu, B. A dielectric polymer with high electric energy density and fast discharge speed. Science 313, 334–336 (2006).
McPherson, J., Kim, J., Shanware, A., Mogul, H. & Rodriguez, J. Proposed universal relationship between dielectric breakdown and dielectric constant. In Digest. International Electron Devices Meeting 633–636 (IEEE, 2002).
McPherson, J., Kim, J.-Y., Shanware, A. & Mogul, H. Thermochemical description of dielectric breakdown in high dielectric constant materials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 2121–2123 (2003).
McPherson, J. W., Kim, J., Shanware, A., Mogul, H. & Rodriguez, J. Trends in the ultimate breakdown strength of high dielectric-constant materials. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 50, 1771–1778 (2003).
Aramberri, H., Fedorova, N. S. & Íñiguez, J. Ferroelectric/paraelectric superlattices for energy storage. Sci. Adv. 8, eabn4880 (2022).
Pan, H. et al. Ultrahigh–energy density lead-free dielectric films via polymorphic nanodomain design. Science 365, 578–582 (2019).
Kim, J. et al. Ultrahigh capacitive energy density in ion-bombarded relaxor ferroelectric films. Science 369, 81–84 (2020).
Pan, H. et al. Ultrahigh energy storage in superparaelectric relaxor ferroelectrics. Science 374, 100–104 (2021).
Yang, B. et al. High-entropy enhanced capacitive energy storage. Nat. Mater. 21, 1074–1080 (2022).
Yang, B. et al. Engineering relaxors by entropy for high energy storage performance. Nat. Energy 8, 956–964 (2023).
Noheda, B. & Catalan, G. in Handbook of Advanced Dielectric, Piezoelectric and Ferroelectric Materials (ed. Ye, Z.-G.) 756–795 (CRC Press, 2008).
Noheda, B. & Cox, D. E. Bridging phases at the morphotropic boundaries of lead oxide solid solutions. Phase Transit. 79, 5–20 (2006).
Yu, Y. et al. Structure-evolution-designed amorphous oxides for dielectric energy storage. Nat. Commun. 14, 3031 (2023).
Kim, H.-J. et al. Ultrahigh energy storage in 2D high-κ perovskites. Nano Lett. 23, 3788–3795 (2023).
Auciello, O. et al. Super high-dielectric-constant oxide films for next-generation nanoelectronics and supercapacitors for energy storage. MRS Bull. 45, 231–238 (2020).
Yang, M. et al. Polymer nanocomposite dielectrics for capacitive energy storage. Nat. Nanotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-023-01541-w (2024).
Acknowledgements
This research was primarily supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division under contract no. DE-AC02-05-CH11231 (Codesign of Ultra-Low-Voltage Beyond CMOS Microelectronics) for the development of materials for low-power microelectronics. This study was also supported by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) as part of the Interaction of Ionizing Radiation with Matter University Research Alliance (IIRM-URA) under contract no. HDTRA1-20-2-0002 and the Berkeley Center for Negative Capacitance Transistors (BCNCT). Work at the Molecular Foundry was supported by the Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the US Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231. This material is based on work supported by the Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering under Air Force contract no. FA8702-15-D-0001. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. S.S.C. and N.S. would like to thank R. Ramesh for characterization facilities and M. Hoffman for the help with LabView setup.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.S.C. conceived the idea and experiments. S.S.C. and N.S. performed material synthesis and ferroic phase optimization. N.S. performed dielectric and electrical measurements. J.S., N.M.E. and N.S. developed the pulsed high-voltage setup, guided by R.C.N.P.-P. S.S.C. performed X-ray characterization. S.-L.H. performed the transmission electron microscopy, guided by J.C. M.M., R.R. and M.C. designed the 3D capacitor structures. N.S., R.R. and M.C. performed the capacitor fabrication. The 2D and 3D capacitor structures were fabricated at the UC Berkeley Marvell Nanofabrication Laboratory and the MIT Lincoln Laboratory Microelectronics Laboratory, respectively. S.S.C. and N.S analysed all results. S.S.C. and N.S. wrote the Article. S.S. supervised the research. All authors contributed to discussions and paper preparations.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
S.S.C, N.S., S.S. and S.-L.H. have filed a US provisional patent (No. 63/625,727) through the University of California, Berkeley (Disclosure BK-2024-082) titled ‘Giant Energy and Power Density Microcapacitors via Ferroic Order Superlattices’.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 Energy storage engineering strategy.
The energy storage density in HZO thin films was optimized through a three-pronged approach: (i) field-driven NC optimization through ferroic phase engineering in ∼10 nm films (left), (ii) scaling up the field-driven NC behavior to ∼100 nm through amorphous-templated superlattices (lower right), and (iii) integration of NC superlattices into 3D Si capacitors to increase the energy storage density per footprint area (upper right).
Extended Data Fig. 2 Dielectric energy storage measurement and methodology.
(a) Experimental setup for pulsed I-V measurements. Voltage is applied with a pulse generator unit (Methods), while the current is measured through the oscilloscope’s 50 Ω input impedance. (b, c, d) The time-dependent applied voltage pulses (b), measured current response (c), and integrated charge (d) for a 9 nm HZO (80% Zr) film. (e) The maximum charge Qmax, residual charge Qres, and their difference Qrev, derived from the charge versus time curve for each voltage pulse (Methods). Qrev is the charge that is reversibly stored and released from the capacitor. (f) Experimental setup for impedance analyzer measurements. (g, h) Measured frequency-dependent magnitude (|Z|, g) and phase (θ, h) of the complex impedance at different biases. (i, j) Fitted real (i) and imaginary (j) parts of the complex impedance assuming a three-component circuit model (k). The series resistance is extracted from the real part at high frequency (Methods) and should be bias-independent as shown in (i). The series resistance was found to be 155 Ω. (k) The three-component circuit model used to correct for the series resistance, where Rs is the series resistance and Rp is the parallel resistance which models the leakage through the capacitor, C. (l) The measured hysteretic charge-voltage curve from pulsed I-V measurements without any series resistance correction. (m) The Rs-corrected hysteretic Q-V curves corresponding to each voltage pulse applied. Note that 50 Ω was added to Rs extracted in (i) due to the additional 50 Ω from the oscilloscope’s input impedance. (n) The extracted energy storage density (ESD) is taken to be the shaded green area (Methods). The shaded blue area represents the hysteretic energy loss during the charging-discharging cycle. (o) ESD as a function of electric field for 9 nm HZO (80% Zr).
Extended Data Fig. 3 Superlattice structure and morphology characterization.
(a, b, c) AFM topography for the 9 nm HZO film (80% Zr, a), HZOx10 superlattice (b), and HZOx10 continuous (c) films. (d) Extracted rms roughness values for each film, demonstrating the persistence of smooth films for the HZO-Al2O3 superlattice. (e, f, g) Schematic of 9 nm HZO (e), HZOx10 superlattice (f), and HZOx10 continuous (g) films. (h) X-ray reflectivity (XRR) of HZOx2-10 superlattice films. Clear superlattice reflections are observed, which indicate that the thin (0.5 nm) Al2O3 layers serve as a sufficient barrier to separate the HZO layers, consistent with TEM (Extended Data Fig. 4) and recent HfO2-based superlattice engineering studies62,108,109,110,111,112,113. In fact, ALD of binary oxide superlattices have demonstrated the absence of chemical intermixing down to atomic layer periodicity114.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Ferroic phase identification in HZOx10 superlattice.
(a) Cross-sectional HR-TEM image for the HZOx10 superlattice demonstrating separated Al2O3 and HZO layers. (b, c, d) HR-TEM (left) and zoom-in HR-TEM (right) images for the top (b), middle (c), and bottom HZO (d) layers in the superlattice. (e-j) Top (e, h), middle (f, i), and bottom (g, j) HZO layers are indexed to the t-phase by oxygen-sensitive negative spherical aberration, demonstrating that the superlattice maintains the t-phase to the ~100 nm regime. For inverted contrast images (e, f, g), the light (dark) atoms represent O (Hf, Zr). For the top HZO layer (e, h), the cation atomic arrangements match to the t-phase [021] zone axis. Along this zone axis, the oxygen atoms overlap with the cations, so only the cations can be matched. Presence of the o-phase and m-phase is ruled out as they do not have a hexagonal-shaped cation arrangement along a zone axis. For the middle (f, i) and bottom HZO layers (g, j), the cation and anion atomic arrangements match to the t-phase [001] and [101] zone axes, respectively. Overall, the structural identification of the t-phase in the superlattice film is consistent with electrical measurements indicating antiferroelectric behavior (Fig. 2, Extended Data Fig. 6). (k-m) Wide field-of-view TEM (k), selected area diffraction pattern (l), and corresponding radial profile integration of diffraction pattern (m) for the HZOx10 superlattice, which indexes to the t-phase, consistent with the oxygen imaging analysis. Furthermore, the HZOx10 superlattice shows similar d101,T lattice spacing as prior work on ∼9 nm ZrO255, suggesting that the superlattice approach maintains a similar strain state as the conventional 9 nm antiferroelectric building block. Therefore, the amorphous Al2O3 template allows the t-phase to persist across the entire thickness, underscoring the important role of amorphous templating108,112,113,115 in HZO antiferroelectric-ferroelectric phase stability116,117.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Ferroic phase identification of continuous HZOx10 film from cation analysis.
(a) Cross-sectional HR-TEM image for the continuous HZOx10 film integrated in an TiN-HZO-TiN MIM capacitor. (b-g) HR-TEM imaging of two HZO regions (b, e), inverted contrast images zoomed-in on single grains (c, f), and corresponding HR-TEM simulations (d, g). The cation arrangement corresponds to the fluorite-structure o-phase (Pca21) [100] and [001] zone axes for region 1 (b-d) and 2 (e-g), respectively (Supplementary Fig. 9). (h-j) Wide field-of-view TEM (h), selected area diffraction pattern (i), and corresponding radial profile integration of diffraction pattern (j) for the HZOx10 continuous film, which primarily indexes to the o-phase, consistent with the cation analysis. The HZOx10 continuous film also shows the presence of some m-phase, which is consistent with the expected phase evolution with increasing thickness15. Additionally, the continuous ∼100 nm HZO film demonstrates similar d111,O lattice spacing as bulk o-phase ZrO2118, suggesting the presence of minimal thin film induced strain contributions which would otherwise be expected from small size effects in thinner films26. Overall, the structural identification of the o-phase in the continuous thick HZO film is consistent with electrical measurements indicating ferroelectric behavior (Fig. 2, Extended Data Fig. 6).
Extended Data Fig. 6 Thickness-dependent evolution of ferroic behavior for continuous and superlattice HZO films.
(a-i) Pulsed Q-E behavior for both continuous (top) and superlattice (bottom) HZO thickness series to the 100 nm thickness regime. Inset: corresponding C-V loops. For the continuous HZO thickness series, an antiferroelectric (HZOx2, a) to mixed antiferroelectric-ferroelectric (HZOx3-4, b,c) to ferroelectric (HZOx5-10, d-i) is observed from the pulsed Q-E curve as regime II (and III) eventually disappear for the HZOx5-10 samples, corresponding to the loss of an antiferroelectric-to-ferroelectric field-dependent phase transition. This is additionally confirmed by the emergence of ferroelectric-like hysteresis in the C-V characteristics. Meanwhile, for the superlattice HZO thickness series, the antiferroelectric behavior is maintained throughout, as regimes I-III are present for each thickness and antiferroelectric-like C-V characteristics are observed. This confirms the ultrathin Al2O3 interlayers reset the HZO grain growth and maintains the desired antiferroelectric behavior. For all figures, the enhanced slope in Regime II is highlighted in gray.
Extended Data Fig. 7 Thickness-dependent evolution of energy storage for continuous and superlattice HZO films.
(a-i) Thickness-dependent areal ESD versus electric field for both continuous (top) and superlattice (bottom) thickness series, extracted from hysteretic charge-field measurements (insets). For the continuous HZO thickness series, ESD saturates with increasing thickness (~250 µJ/cm2) as the continuous HZO films become fully ferroelectric with increasing thickness (Extended Data Fig. 6). Meanwhile for the superlattice HZO thickness series, the areal ESD scales approximately linearly with thickness due to the persistence of the desired antiferroelectric behavior (Extended Data Fig. 6).
Extended Data Fig. 8 Reliability characterization.
(a) Leakage current versus electric field for continuous (blue) and superlattice (purple) HZO thickness series films. For all thicknesses, the superlattice approach shows 2-3 orders of magnitude of lower leakage current, derived from the presence of the high-bandgap Al2O3 interlayer and increased number of interfaces. (b, c) Energy storage and efficiency for 2D planar (b) and 3D trench (c) capacitors integrating the HZOx10 superlattice after cycling at two electric fields (1 µs pulses): one near the onset of Regime II (3.0 MV/cm and 2.5 MV/cm for planar and trench, respectively) and another at 0.5 MV/cm higher field. Near the onset of Regime II, the endurance of both planar and trench capacitors show endurance larger than 108 cycles. At 0.5 MV/cm higher electric field, the endurance is beyond 106 cycles. (d, e) Weibull distribution of the breakdown field, comparing the HZOx10 continuous and HZOx10 superlattice films in 2D planar capacitors (d) and the HZOx10 superlattice films integrated into 2D planar and 3D trench capacitors (e). The 3D trench capacitors show a 24% lower breakdown field compared to the 2D planar capacitors, likely derived from surface inhomogeneities, which can lead to an uneven distribution of electric fields.
Extended Data Fig. 9 Power Density Extraction.
(a, e) Schematic of 2D (a) and 3D trench (e) capacitor structures. (b, f) Measured discharged current versus time during 200 ns fall time of voltage pulse for both 2D planar (f) and 3D trench (f) capacitors. The sub-microsecond discharge time is consistent with other reported electrostatic capacitors119. (c, g) Power density as a function of time for both 2D (c) and 3D (g) capacitors. The power was calculated by multiplying the measured voltage and current during the discharging stage of the voltage pulse (Methods). (d, h) Energy storage density as a function of time for both 2D (d) and 3D (h) capacitors. The characteristic discharging time was taken to be when 90% of the stored energy had discharged (Methods).
Extended Data Fig. 10 Permittivity-breakdown trade-off.
Permittivity-breakdown strength (κ-EBD) relationship for various dielectric materials, which tend to follow an EBD ∼ κ−0.5 empirical trend120,121,122. In this work, we engineer the field-induced nonpolar-to-polar phase transition and its associated NC effect to enhances permittivity during the charging-discharging process (the maximum permittivity extracted from pulsed I-V measurements during Regime II is reported). This approach can overcome the conventional κ-EBD trend which limits energy storage in dielectric capacitors (Supplementary Text), ultimately leading to the largest volumetric ESD value reported for a BEOL-compatible dielectric (Supplementary Table 1). Additional promising systems to overcome this trend towards breakthrough ESD values include other (anti)ferroelectric superlattices demonstrating field-driven ferroic phase transitions74,75,76,123, relaxor ferroelectrics124,125,126,127,128, morphotropic phase boundary systems129,130, amorphous-engineered oxides131, 2D-layered perovskites132, super-high-κ nanolaminates133, and interface engineering in polymer nanocomposites134.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
This file contains Supplementary Tables 1–4, Supplementary Figs. 1–11, Supplementary Text and Supplementary References.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cheema, S.S., Shanker, N., Hsu, SL. et al. Giant energy storage and power density negative capacitance superlattices. Nature 629, 803–809 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07365-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07365-5
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.