Abstract
Raised peatlands, or bogs, are gently mounded landforms that are composed entirely of organic matter1,2,3,4 and store the most carbon per area of any terrestrial ecosystem5. The shapes of bogs are critically important because their domed morphology4,6,7 accounts for much of the carbon that bogs store and determines how they will respond to interventions8,9 to stop greenhouse gas emissions and fires after anthropogenic drainage10,11,12,13. However, a general theory to infer the morphology of bogs is still lacking4,6,7. Here we show that an equation based on the processes universal to bogs explains their morphology across biomes, from Alaska, through the tropics, to New Zealand. In contrast to earlier models of bog morphology that attempted to describe only long-term equilibrium shapes4,6,7 and were, therefore, inapplicable to most bogs14,15,16, our approach makes no such assumption and makes it possible to infer full shapes of bogs from a sample of elevations, such as a single elevation transect. Our findings provide a foundation for quantitative inference about the morphology, hydrology and carbon storage of bogs through Earth’s history, as well as a basis for planning natural climate solutions by rewetting damaged bogs around the world.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The lidar and topographic data used in this study are available from the Estonian Topographic Database, the Natural Resources of Canada High Resolution Digital Elevation Model (HRDEM) project, USGS National Map (products LPC AK POW P2 2018 and LPC ARRA-LFTNE MAINE 2010), Minnesota Geospatial Information Office, National Land Survey of Finland, the Brunei Darussalam Survey Department and OpenTopography (collection Huntly, Waikato, New Zealand 2015–2019). The derived data reported in this paper have been deposited in the PANGAEA open access data archive, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.931195. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Molengraaff, G. A. F. Borneo Expeditie—Geologische Verkenningstochten in Centraal-Borneo (1893–94) [Borneo Expedition—Geological Reconnaissance in Central Borneo (1893–94)] (Gerlings, 1900).
Weber, C. A. Über die Vegetation und Entstehung des Hochmoors von Augstumal im Memeldelta mit vergleichenden Ausblicken auf andere Hochmoore der Erde; Eine Formationsbiologisch-historische und Geologische Studie (Paul Parey, 1902).
Granlund, E. De svenska högmossarnas geologi. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökningar 26, 1–93 (1932).
Ivanov, K. E. Water Movement in Mirelands (Academic, 1981) [transl.].
Temmink, R. J. M. et al. Recovering wetland biogeomorphic feedbacks to restore the world’s biotic carbon hotspots. Science 376, eabn1479 (2022).
Ingram, H. A. P. Size and shape in raised mire ecosystems: a geophysical model. Nature 297, 300–303 (1982).
Cobb, A. R. et al. How temporal patterns in rainfall determine the geomorphology and carbon fluxes of tropical peatlands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 114, E5187–E5196 (2017).
Price, J. S., Heathwaite, A. L. & Baird, A. J. Hydrological processes in abandoned and restored peatlands: An overview of management approaches. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 11, 65–83 (2003).
Ritzema, H., Limin, S., Kusin, K., Jauhiainen, J. & Wösten, H. Canal blocking strategies for hydrological restoration of degraded tropical peatlands in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Catena 114, 11–20 (2014).
Johnston, F. H. et al. Estimated global mortality attributable to smoke from landscape fires. Environ. Health Perspect. 120, 695–701 (2012).
Koplitz, S. N. et al. Public health impacts of the severe haze in Equatorial Asia in September–October 2015: demonstration of a new framework for informing fire management strategies to reduce downwind smoke exposure. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 094023 (2016).
Miettinen, J., Hooijer, A., Vernimmen, R., Liew, S. C. & Page, S. E. From carbon sink to carbon source: extensive peat oxidation in insular Southeast Asia since 1990. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 024014 (2017).
Leifeld, J., Wüst-Galley, C. & Page, S. Intact and managed peatland soils as a source and sink of GHGs from 1850 to 2100. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 945–947 (2019).
Limpens, J. et al. Peatlands and the carbon cycle: from local processes to global implications – a synthesis. Biogeosciences 5, 1475–1491 (2008).
Lund, M. et al. Variability in exchange of CO2 across 12 northern peatland and tundra sites. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 2436–2448 (2010).
Hirano, T., Jauhiainen, J., Inoue, T. & Takahashi, H. Controls on the carbon balance of tropical peatlands. Ecosystems 12, 873–887 (2009).
Gorham, E. The development of peat lands. Q. Rev. Biol. 32, 145–166 (1957).
Anderson, J. A. R. The structure and development of the peat swamps of Sarawak and Brunei. J. Trop. Geogr. 18, 7–16 (1964).
Evans, C. D. et al. Overriding water table control on managed peatland greenhouse gas emissions. Nature 593, 548–552 (2021).
Rydin, H. & Jeglum, J. The Biology of Peatlands (Oxford Univ. Press, 2006).
Lähteenoja, O., Flores, B. & Nelson, B. Tropical peat accumulation in Central Amazonia. Wetlands 33, 495–503 (2013).
Dargie, G. C. et al. Congo Basin peatlands: threats and conservation priorities. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 24, 669–686 (2019).
Gorham, E. Northern peatlands: role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecol. Appl. 1, 182–195 (1991).
Yu, Z., Loisel, J., Brosseau, D. P., Beilman, D. W. & Hunt, S. J. Global peatland dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L13402 (2010).
Frolking, S. et al. Peatlands in the Earth’s 21st century climate system. Environ. Rev. 19, 371–396 (2011).
Dommain, R. et al. A radiative forcing analysis of tropical peatlands before and after their conversion to agricultural plantations. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 5518–5533 (2018).
Ritzema, H. P. (ed.) Drainage Principles and Applications (International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, 1994).
Turetsky, M. R. et al. Global vulnerability of peatlands to fire and carbon loss. Nat. Geosci. 8, 11–14 (2014).
Morecroft, M. D. et al. Measuring the success of climate change adaptation and mitigation in terrestrial ecosystems. Science 366, eaaw9256 (2019).
Goldstein, A. et al. Protecting irrecoverable carbon in Earth’s ecosystems. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 287–295 (2020).
Korpela, I., Koskinen, M., Vasander, H., Holopainen, M. & Minkkinen, K. Airborne small-footprint discrete-return LiDAR data in the assessment of boreal mire surface patterns, vegetation, and habitats. For. Ecol. Manag. 258, 1549–1566 (2009).
Vernimmen, R. et al. Creating a lowland and peatland landscape digital terrain model (DTM) from interpolated partial coverage LiDAR data for Central Kalimantan and East Sumatra, Indonesia. Remote Sens. 11, 1152 (2019).
Warren, M., Hergoualc’h, K., Kauffman, J. B., Murdiyarso, D. & Kolka, R. An appraisal of Indonesia’s immense peat carbon stock using national peatland maps: uncertainties and potential losses from conversion. Carbon Balance Manage. 12, 12 (2017).
Greb, S. F., DiMichele, W. A. & Gastaldo, R. A. in Wetlands Through Time (eds. Greb, S. F. & DiMichele, W. A.) 1–40 (Geological Society of America, 2006).
Morley, R. J. Cenozoic ecological history of South East Asian peat mires based on the comparison of coals with present day and Late Quaternary peats. J. Limnol. 72, 36–59 (2013).
Treat, C. C. et al. Widespread global peatland establishment and persistence over the last 130,000 y. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 116, 4822–4827 (2019).
Crezee, B. et al. Mapping peat thickness and carbon stocks of the central Congo Basin using field data. Nat. Geosci. 15, 639–644 (2022).
Hastie, A. et al. Risks to carbon storage from land-use change revealed by peat thickness maps of Peru. Nat. Geosci. 15, 369–374 (2022).
Childs, E. C. & Youngs, E. G. A study of some three-dimensional field-drainage problems. Soil Sci. 92, 15–24 (1961).
Baird, A. J. et al. High permeability explains the vulnerability of the carbon store in drained tropical peatlands. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 1333–1339 (2017).
Cobb, A. R. & Harvey, C. F. Scalar simulation and parameterization of water table dynamics in tropical peatlands. Water Resour. Res. 55, 9351–9377 (2019).
Morris, P. J., Baird, A. J., Eades, P. A. & Surridge, B. W. J. Controls on near-surface hydraulic conductivity in a raised bog. Water Resour. Res. 55, 1531–1543 (2019).
Noon, M. L. et al. Mapping the irrecoverable carbon in Earth’s ecosystems. Nat. Sustain. 5, 37–46 (2021).
Tay, T. H. The distribution, characteristics, uses and potential of peat in West Malaysia. J. Trop. Geogr. 29, 58–63 (1969).
Lim, K. H., Lim, S. S., Parish, F. & Suharto, R. (eds) RSPO Manual on Best Management Practices (BMPs) for Existing Oil Palm Cultivation on Peat (Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil, 2012).
Holden, J., Chapman, P. J. & Labadz, J. C. Artificial drainage of peatlands: hydrological and hydrochemical process and wetland restoration. Prog. Phys. Geog. 28, 95–123 (2004).
Andriesse, J. P. Nature and management of tropical peat soils. FAO Soils Bulletin https://www.fao.org/3/x5872e/x5872e00.htm (1988).
Silvestri, S. et al. Quantification of peat thickness and stored carbon at the landscape scale in tropical peatlands: a comparison of airborne geophysics and an empirical topographic method. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 124, 3107–3123 (2019).
Parry, L. E., Holden, J. & Chapman, P. J. Restoration of blanket peatlands. J. Environ. Manage. 133, 193–205 (2014).
Dommain, R. et al. in Peatland Restoration and Ecosystem Services (eds. Bonn, A., Allott, T., Evans, M., Joosten, H. & Stoneman, R.) 253–288 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2016).
Martin-Ortega, J., Allott, T. E. H., Glenk, K. & Schaafsma, M. Valuing water quality improvements from peatland restoration: evidence and challenges. Ecosyst. Serv. 9, 34–43 (2014).
Hidayat, H., Hoekman, D. H., Vissers, M. A. M. & Hoitink, A. J. F. Flood occurrence mapping of the middle Mahakam lowland area using satellite radar. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 16, 1805–1816 (2012).
Cecil, C. B. et al. Paleoclimate controls on Late Paleozoic sedimentation and peat formation in the central Appalachian basin (USA). Int. J. Coal Geol. 5, 195–230 (1985).
Greb, S. F. et al. in Extreme Depositional Environments: Mega End Members in Geologic Time (eds. Chan, M. A. & Archer, A. W.) 127–150 (Geological Society of America, 2003).
Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).
Xu, J., Morris, P. J., Liu, J. & Holden, J. PEATMAP: refining estimates of global peatland distribution based on a meta-analysis. Catena 160, 134–140 (2018).
Korhola, A. A. Radiocarbon evidence for rates of lateral expansion in raised mires in southern Finland. Quat. Res. 42, 299–307 (1994).
Edom, F., Münch, A., Dittrich, I., Keßler, K. & Peters, R. Hydromorphological analysis and water balance modelling of ombro- and mesotrophic peatlands. Adv. Geosci. 27, 131–137 (2010).
Hooijer, A. in Forests, Water and People in the Humid Tropics (eds. Bonell, M. & Bruijnzeel, L. A.) 447–461 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).
Rezanezhad, F. et al. Structure of peat soils and implications for water storage, flow and solute transport: a review update for geochemists. Chem. Geol. 429, 75–84 (2016).
Baird, A. J., Eades, P. A. & Surridge, B. W. J. The hydraulic structure of a raised bog and its implications for ecohydrological modelling of bog development. Ecohydrology 1, 289–298 (2008).
Heinselman, M. L. Forest sites, bog processes, and peatland types in the Glacial Lake Agassiz region, Minnesota. Ecol. Monogr. 33, 327–374 (1963).
Glaser, P. H. & Janssens, J. A. Raised bogs in eastern North America: transitions in landforms and gross stratigraphy. Can. J. Bot. 64, 395–415 (1986).
Cobb, A. R., Dommain, R., Tan, F., Heng, N. H. E. & Harvey, C. F. Carbon storage capacity of tropical peatlands in natural and artificial drainage networks. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 114009 (2020).
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T. & Flannery, B. P. Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing 2nd edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992).
Averick, B. M. & Ortega, J. M. Fast solution of nonlinear Poisson-type equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 14, 44–48 (1993).
Youngs, E. G. Horizontal seepage through unconfined aquifers with hydraulic conductivity varying with depth. J. Hydrol. 3, 283–296 (1965).
Youngs, E. G. An examination of computed steady-state water-table heights in unconfined aquifers: Dupuit-Forchheimer estimates and exact analytical results. J. Hydrol. 119, 201–214 (1990).
Belyea, L. R. & Baird, A. J. Beyond “the limits to peat bog growth”: cross-scale feedback in peatland development. Ecol. Monogr. 76, 299–322 (2006).
GDAL/OGR contributors. GDAL/OGR Geospatial Data Abstraction software Library, version 2.3.2 (Open Source Geospatial Foundation, 2018).
GRASS Development Team. Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS GIS) software, version 7.4.4 (Open Source Geospatial Foundation, 2018).
Dachnowski-Stokes, A. P. Peat resources in Alaska. Technical Bulletin 769, United States Department of Agriculture (1941).
Glaser, P. H., Janssens, J. A. & Siegel, D. I. The response of vegetation to chemical and hydrological gradients in the Lost River peatland, Northern Minnesota. J. Ecol. 78, 1021–1048 (1990).
Gorham, E., Janssens, J. A. & Glaser, P. H. Rates of peat accumulation during the postglacial period in 32 sites from Alaska to Newfoundland, with special emphasis on northern Minnesota. Can. J. Bot. 81, 429–438 (2003).
Raymond, R., Cameron, C. C. & Cohen, A. D. Relationship between peat geochemistry and depositional environments, Cranberry Island, Maine. Int. J. Coal Geol. 8, 175–187 (1987).
Korhola, A., Alm, J., Tolonen, K., Turunen, J. & Jungner, H. Three-dimensional reconstruction of carbon accumulation and CH4 emission during nine millennia in a raised mire. J. Quat. Sci. 11, 161–165 (1996).
Salm, J.-O. et al. Emissions of CO2, CH4 and N2O from undisturbed, drained and mined peatlands in Estonia. Hydrobiologia 692, 41–55 (2012).
Ilomets, M. in Mires and Peatlands of Europe (eds. Joosten, H., Tanneberger, F. & Moen, A.) 360–371 (Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 2017).
Anderson, J. A. R. The Ecology and Forest Types of the Peat Swamp Forests of Sarawak and Brunei in Relation to their Silviculture. PhD thesis, Univ. Edinburgh (1961).
Maggs, G. R. Hydrology of the Kopouatai peat dome. J. Hydrol. N. Z. 36, 147–172 (1997).
Clarkson, B. R., Schipper, L. A. & Lehmann, A. Vegetation and peat characteristics in the development of lowland restiad peat bogs, North Island, New Zealand. Wetlands 24, 133–151 (2004).
Thornburrow, B., Williamson, J. & Outram, P. Kopuatai Peat Dome Drainage & Desktop Hydrological Study: Report Prepared for New Zealand Department of Conservation (Sinclair Knight Merz, 2009).
Newnham, R. M. et al. Peat humification records from Restionaceae bogs in northern New Zealand as potential indicators of Holocene precipitation, seasonality, and ENSO. Quat. Sci. Rev. 218, 378–394 (2019).
Sjörs, H. Bogs and fens in the Hudson Bay lowlands. Arctic 12, 2–19 (1959).
Glaser, P. H., Siegel, D. I., Reeve, A. S. & Chanton, J. P. in Peatlands: Evolution and Records of Environmental and Climate Changes (eds. Martini, I. P., Martinez Cortízas, A., & Chesworth, W.) 347–376 (Elsevier, 2006).
Vitt, D. H. in Boreal Peatland Ecosystems (eds. Wieder, R. K. & Vitt, D. H.) 9–24 (Springer, 2006).
Honorio Coronado, E. N. et al. Intensive field sampling increases the known extent of carbon-rich Amazonian peatland pole forests. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 074048 (2021).
Bradof, K. L. in The Patterned Peatlands of Minnesota (eds. Wright, Jr., H. E., Coffin, B. A. & Aaseng, N. E.) 263–284 (Univ. Minnesota Press, 1992).
Bradof, K. L. in The Patterned Peatlands of Minnesota (eds. Wright, Jr, H. E., Coffin, B. A. & Aaseng, N. E.) 173–186 (Univ. Minnesota Press, 1992).
Geuzaine, C. & Remacle, J.-F. Gmsh: a 3-D finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 79, 1309–1331 (2009).
Bangerth, W., Hartmann, R. & Kanschat, G. deal.II—a general-purpose object-oriented finite element library. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 33, 24/1–24/27 (2007).
Arndt, D. et al. The deal.II library, version 9.1. J. Numer. Math. 27, 203–213 (2019).
Iman, R. L. & Conover, W. J. The use of the rank transform in regression. Technometrics 21, 499–509 (1979).
Simpson, J., Smith, T. & Wooster, M. Assessment of errors caused by forest vegetation structure in airborne LiDAR-derived DTMs. Remote Sens. 9, 1101 (2017).
Lampela, M. et al. Ground surface microtopography and vegetation patterns in a tropical peat swamp forest. Catena 139, 127–136 (2016).
Campbell, E. O. in Ecosystems of the World, 4B: Mires: Swamp, Bog, Fen and Moor: Regional Studies (ed. Gore, A. J. P.) 153–180 (Elsevier, 1983).
Heathwaite, A. L., Eggelsmann, R. & Göttlich, K. H. in Mires: Process, Exploitation and Conservation (eds. Heathwaite, A. L. & Göttlich, Kh.) 417–484 (Wiley, 1993).
Mulqueen, J. Hydrology and drainage of peatland. Environ. Geology Water Sci. 9, 15–22 (1986).
Joosten, H., Tapio-Biström, M.-L., & Susanna Tol, S. (eds) Peatlands — Guidance for Climate Change Mitigation through Conservation, Rehabilitation and Sustainable Use Vol. 5, 2nd edn (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Wetlands International, 2012).
Joosten, H. & Tanneberger, F. in Mires and Peatlands of Europe (eds. Joosten, H., Tanneberger, F. & Moen, A.) 151–172 (Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 2017).
Cobb, A. R., Dommain, R., Yeap, K. & Cao, H. Raster grids of eight bogs in North America, Europe, Borneo, and New Zealand. PANGAEA https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.931195 (2023).
Emery, K. O., Wigley, R. L., Bartlett, A. S., Rubin, M. & Barghoorn, E. S. Freshwater peat on the continental shelf. Science 158, 1301–1307 (1967).
Situmorang, M., Kuntoro, Faturachman, A., Ilahude, D. & Siregar, D. A. Distribution and characteristics of Quaternary peat deposits in eastern Jawa Sea. Bull. Mar. Geol. Inst. Indon. 8, 9–20 (1993).
Kremenetski, K. V. et al. Peatlands of the Western Siberian lowlands: current knowledge on zonation, carbon content and Late Quaternary history. Quat. Sci. Rev. 22, 703–723 (2003).
Dommain, R., Couwenberg, J. & Joosten, H. Development and carbon sequestration of tropical peat domes in south-east Asia: links to post-glacial sea-level changes and Holocene climate variability. Quat. Sci. Rev. 30, 999–1010 (2011).
Ruppel, M., Väliranta, M., Virtanen, T. & Korhola, A. Postglacial spatiotemporal peatland initiation and lateral expansion dynamics in North America and northern Europe. Holocene 23, 1596–1606 (2013).
Comas, X., Slater, L. & Reeve, A. Geophysical evidence for peat basin morphology and stratigraphic controls on vegetation observed in a Northern Peatland. J. Hydrol. 295, 173–184 (2004).
Comas, X. et al. Imaging tropical peatlands in Indonesia using ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and electrical resistivity imaging (ERI): implications for carbon stock estimates and peat soil characterization. Biogeosciences 12, 2995–3007 (2015).
Suhip, M. A. A., Gödeke, S. H., Cobb, A. R. & Sukri, R. S. Seismic refraction study, single well test and physical core analysis of anthropogenic degraded peat at the Badas Peat Dome, Brunei Darussalam. Eng. Geol. 273, 105689 (2020).
Loisel, J. et al. A database and synthesis of northern peatland soil properties and Holocene carbon and nitrogen accumulation. Holocene 24, 1028–1042 (2014).
Korhola, A., Tolonen, K., Turunen, J. & Jungner, H. Estimating long-term carbon accumulation rates in boreal peatlands by radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 37, 575–584 (1995).
Dommain, R. et al. Forest dynamics and tip-up pools drive pulses of high carbon accumulation rates in a tropical peat dome in Borneo (Southeast Asia). J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 120, 617–640 (2015).
Schipper, L. A. & McLeod, M. Subsidence rates and carbon loss in peat soils following conversion to pasture in the Waikato Region, New Zealand. Soil Use Manag. 18, 91–93 (2006).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to J. Ratcliffe for pointing us to lidar data for Kopuatai and to J. Cobb, A. Konings, J. Ratcliffe, H. A. Stone and D. Wardle for critical comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by the National Research Foundation Singapore through the Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology’s Center for Environmental Sensing and Modeling interdisciplinary research programme and grant nos. NRF2016-ITCOO1-021 and NRF2019-ITC001-001, by the US National Science Foundation under grants no. 1923491 and 2039771 and by the Office for Space Technology and Industry (OSTIn), Singapore’s national space office, through its Space Technology Development Programme (grant no. S22-02005-STDP). This work comprises EOS contribution 552. Lidar and topographic data were provided by the Estonian Topographic Database, the Natural Resources of Canada High Resolution Digital Elevation Model (HRDEM) project, USGS National Map, Minnesota Geospatial Information Office, National Land Survey of Finland, Brunei Darussalam Survey Department and OpenTopography.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.R.C. conceived the study, performed the analysis, prepared the figures and drafted the paper. A.R.C., C.H., K.Y. and R.D. identified and outlined bog sites with lidar data and developed the workflow for the creation of digital terrain maps and meshing of bog polygons. B.B., C.F.H. and P.H.G. supervised and provided feedback on the study design. A.R.C., B.B., C.F.H., N.C.D. and R.D. participated in editing of the final manuscript and all authors contributed to review and data interpretation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature thanks Julie Loisel and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 Inferring morphology of bogs with ditching.
Analysis of a bog cut by a ditch in Lost River peatland, Minnesota. Bog boundaries, lidar-derived surface elevations and approximations to bog morphology obtained by transforming the solution to Poisson’s equation to bog-surface elevations as in Fig. 1. Top, analysis of peatland boundary, ignoring ditch. If the ditch is ignored, the rank correlation between surface elevations and Poisson elevations is lower (0.98) because the assumptions underlying our approach are not valid in the ditch, in which open-channel flow occurs. Bottom, analysis of a subdomain that excludes the ditch, showing excellent agreement with the lidar topography (ρ = 0.99). The correlation coefficient is also improved (0.98 versus 0.96), despite the smaller total relief within the subdomain boundary (2.45 m versus 4.21 m) relative to microtopographic relief (about 0.3 m). Satellite images: Google, Landsat/Copernicus.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Reanalysis of topography, time-averaged water table and hydraulic transmissivity in a dynamic model.
a, Location of flowtube on the Mendaram bog for the simulation shown in Fig. 7 of ref. 7. Satellite image: CNES/Airbus, Google, Maxar Technologies. b, Simulated water level, relative to local depressions, in the bog interior and at the bog margin, driven by recharge derived from weather station rainfall. The data intervals that are shown correspond to calendar years 2001, 2003 and 2007. c, Minimum and maximum water tables within the flowtube for 2001, 2003 and 2007 (2007 overlies other years). d, Distribution of water level for 2001, 2003 and 2007 (same colour scheme as b) for bog interior (solid lines) and margin (dashed lines); interior and margin time series are plotted in b but are not distinguishable. e,f, Hydraulic transmissivity in the model as a function of water level (black line) and time-averaged transmissivity and water level along the flowtube (coloured points) in the three simulation years. g, Average transmissivity divided by net recharge versus surface elevation for 2001, 2003 and 2007. h, Bog surface (dashed line) and time-averaged water table ⟨H⟩ (coloured lines) versus Poisson elevation ϕ for 2001, 2003 and 2007 (2007 overlies other years).
Extended Data Fig. 3 Inferring morphology of bogs with incomplete elevation data.
a, Milot: available elevation data exclude southeast corner of bog. b, Mendaram: elevation data end at national boundary. c, Rivers bounding Mendaram bog are obscured by floating vegetation but visible in high-resolution images. d, Estimated bog crest (groundwater divide) and flowlines used as no-flow (Neumann) boundaries. The location of the groundwater divide was estimated from available elevation data and the larger topographic setting (b). Satellite images: CNES/Airbus, Google, Maxar Technologies.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cobb, A.R., Dommain, R., Yeap, K. et al. A unified explanation for the morphology of raised peatlands. Nature 625, 79–84 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06807-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06807-w
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.