arising from: P. Zhu etal. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04062-5 (2021)
In over-wintering annuals of Arabidopsis thaliana grown in temperate regions, prolonged cold exposure in winter, through the physiological process of vernalization, represses the expression of the potent floral repressor FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) to enable the transition to flowering in spring1,2. Recently, Zhu et al.3 reported that cold induced nuclear condensation of FRIGIDA (FRI) for FLC repression and that cold-induced antisense RNA COOLAIR promoted FRI condensation during prolonged cold exposure. Here we report that the cold-induced formation of nuclear FRI condensates is independent of COOLAIR.
Before exposure to cold, FRI activates FLC expression, and long-term continuous winter cold exposure (typically lasting more than a month) results in FLC repression in FRI-bearing winter annuals grown at high latitudes1,4. Prolonged cold exposure induces the expression of COOLAIR, a group of non-coding antisense RNAs initiating from a region downstream of the 3′ end of FLC that is composed of proximally polyadenylated class I and distally polyadenylated class II transcripts5. COOLAIR expression reaches a high level after around 3 weeks of cold exposure and subsequently declines under constant cold temperature6. Using a CRISPR–Cas9 system, we previously constructed several lines in which a large part of the core COOLAIR promoter region was removed7, resulting in the elimination of both class I and class II COOLAIR transcripts before cold exposure (Fig. 1a,b and Extended Data Fig. 1a,b). Furthermore, consistent with a recent study8, cold induction of COOLAIR expression was eliminated in these core promoter deletion lines (Fig. 1b), partly because the cis-acting cold-responsive elements located in the promoter region have been removed. To examine the role of COOLAIR in FRI condensation, we introduced a functional FRI-GFP into two lines in which the COOLAIR promoter was deleted—ΔCOOLAIR-1 and ΔCOOLAIR-2—in the rapid-cycling accession Col-0 (bearing a loss-of-function fri allele9) by genetic transformation. Subsequently, independent FRI-GFPΔCOOLAIR lines (numbers 2, 5 and 7) were backcrossed to Col-0 and ΔCOOLAIR-1 or ΔCOOLAIR-2, respectively, resulting in F1 progeny of FRI-GFPΔCOOLAIR−/− and FRI-GFPΔCOOLAIR+/−. In these lines, FRI–GFP is fully functional and acts to activate FLC expression before cold exposure (Extended Data Fig. 1c–f).
We next determined whether the loss of COOLAIR expression might reduce nuclear FRI condensation. We measured the fluorescence intensity of FRI–GFP in the root tips and the size and number of FRI–GFP condensates in root tip nuclei of cold-treated FRI-GFPΔCOOLAIR+/− and FRI-GFPΔCOOLAIR−/− seedlings and found that there was no difference between these two genotypes (Fig. 1e–i). Furthermore, we crossed a FRI-GFP line3 to both ΔCOOLAIR-1 and ΔCOOLAIR-2 and obtained homozygous FRI-GFPΔCOOLAIR lines. Subsequently, we measured the size and number of FRI–GFP condensates in root tip nuclei in these lines after cold exposure and found that there was no statistically significant difference (Fig. 2a–f). Together, these results show that the cold-induced formation of nuclear FRI condensates is independent of COOLAIR expression, given that, before and during cold exposure, COOLAIR expression (including class I and class II transcripts) was eliminated in both the ΔCOOLAIR-1 and ΔCOOLAIR-2 lines.
Zhu et al.3 reported that, in the cold, the FRI protein enriched class II.ii COOLAIR transcripts and that the FRI–class II.ii interaction was closely connected with cold-induced FRI condensation. Using a transgenic FLC terminator exchange (TEX) line in which the COOLAIR promoter was replaced with an RBCS3B (encoding Rubisco small subunit 3B) terminator, Zhu et al.3 found that the size and number per nucleus of FRI–GFP condensates were reduced in the TEX line compared with those in the non-transgenic background (Col-0). In the ΔCOOLAIR lines that we used in this study, the class II transcripts are eliminated before cold exposure and in the cold. Thus, we conclude that the FRI-class II.ii interaction and COOLAIR expression are not involved in cold-induced FRI condensation. The cause for the discrepancy between the two studies is unclear.
In addition to the COOLAIR transcripts initiated downstream of the 3′ end of FLC, there are other antisense transcripts (ASTs) initiated within the FLC locus (see, for example, ref. 10). We examined these ASTs in FRI-Col (a reference winter-annual line11) and FRIΔCOOLAIR seedlings, and found that they were at low levels before cold exposure (Fig. 2g). After cold exposure for 3 days, the expression of ASTs in all three examined regions declined in FRI-Col, and was apparently reduced in two examined regions in the FRIΔCOOLAIR seedlings (Fig. 2g); cold exposure for 14 days strongly suppressed the expression of ASTs in both the FRI-Col and FRIΔCOOLAIR lines (Fig. 2h). Thus, in contrast to COOLAIR, the expression of ASTs is repressed along the early phase of long-term cold exposure or vernalization. The function of ASTs in the vernalization-mediated FLC repression remains to be seen.
Cold induction of COOLAIR expression in the early phase of vernalization was reported to mediate FLC repression5,6. We measured the levels of FLC transcripts (both spliced and unspliced) in the cold-treated FRIΔCOOLAIR seedlings, and found that loss of COOLAIR expression in either FRIΔCOOLAIR-1 or FRIΔCOOLAIR-2 had no effect on the progression of transcriptional shutdown of FLC during cold exposure or on post-cold stable silencing of FLC (Fig. 1c,d and Extended Data Fig. 1g), consistent with observations in a recent study8. Notably, in our vernalization study, like several other studies reporting a role of COOLAIR for FLC repression5,6, seedlings were exposed to a constant cold temperature, the mechanisms uncovered through which may not fully represent FLC regulation by winter cold in the fields with fluctuating cold temperatures.
In summary, our study shows that the cold-induced formation of nuclear FRI condensates is independent of COOLAIR. Moreover, our vernalization study with constant cold temperature shows that COOLAIR is not involved in FLC repression by prolonged cold exposure. Thus, more in-depth experiments would be required to resolve the role of COOLAIR in vernalization.
Methods
Arabidopsis thaliana FRI-Col, Col-0, ΔCOOLAIR-1 and FRIΔCOOLAIR-1 were described previously7. Treatment of the seedlings with constant cold and quantification of the expression of genes of interest using quantitative PCR were performed as previously described12. COOLAIR expression was examined by semiquantitative PCR, after reverse transcription using transcript-specific primers (5′-TGGTTGTTATTTGGTGGTGTGAA-3′ for class I; and 5′-GCCCGACGAAGAAAAAGTAG-3′ for class II10). A list of the PCR primers is provided in Extended Data Table 1.
FRIpro:FRI-GFP was constructed by cloning a 4.8 kb genomic FRI fragment (2.5 kb promoter plus the 2.3 kb entire coding region without the stop codon) upstream of the GFP-coding region in the binary vector pMDC11013. Microscopy analysis and image quantification of nuclear FRI–GFP condensates were performed as follows. Root tips of the seedling samples were imaged using the Zeiss LSM900 confocal microscope with a ×40/1 NA water objective and an Airyscan detector of GaAsP-PMT. GFP fluorescence was excited at a wavelength of 488 nm (argon ion laser and laser power 8.0%), and detected at 490–620 nm in lambda mode. All of the images were obtained with a pixel size of 0.119 μm, and exported using the ZEN3.1 software (Zeiss) for quantitative analysis. The number of spots (with an area of larger than 0.1 μm2) per nucleus and the spot area in the F1 seedlings were obtained by outlining the spots using Graphics from ZEN3.1. Similarly, the fluorescent spots with an area of larger than 0.05 μm2 were scored in the root tips of the seedlings bearing the homozygous FRI-GFP3.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this Article.
Data availability
Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Bouche, F., Woods, D. P. & Amasino, R. M. Winter memory throughout the plant kingdom: different paths to flowering. Plant Physiol. 173, 27–35 (2017).
Andres, F. & Coupland, G. The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 627–639 (2012).
Zhu, P., Lister, C. & Dean, C. Cold-induced Arabidopsis FRIGIDA nuclear condensates for FLC repression. Nature 599, 657–661 (2021).
Antoniou-Kourounioti, R. L. et al. Temperature sensing is distributed throughout the regulatory network that controls FLC epigenetic silencing in vernalization. Cell Syst. 7, 643–655 (2018).
Swiezewski, S., Liu, F., Magusin, A. & Dean, C. Cold-induced silencing by long antisense transcripts of an Arabidopsis Polycomb target. Nature 462, 799–802 (2009).
Csorba, T., Questa, J. I., Sun, Q. & Dean, C. Antisense COOLAIR mediates the coordinated switching of chromatin states at FLC during vernalization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16160–16165 (2014).
Luo, X., Chen, T., Zeng, X. L., He, D. W. & He, Y. H. Feedback regulation of FLC by FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and FD through a 5′ FLC promoter region in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 12, 285–288 (2019).
Jeon, M. et al. Vernalization-triggered expression of the antisense transcript COOLAIR is mediated by CBF genes. eLife 12, e84594 (2023).
Johanson, U. et al. Molecular analysis of FRIGIDA, a major determinant of natural variation in Arabidopsis flowering time. Science 290, 344–347 (2000).
Zhao, Y. et al. Natural temperature fluctuations promote COOLAIR regulation of FLC. Genes Dev. 35, 888–898 (2021).
Lee, I., Michaels, S. D., Masshardt, A. S. & Amasino, R. M. The late-flowering phenotype of FRIGIDA and luminidependens is suppressed in the Landsberg erecta strain of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 6, 903–909 (1994).
Xu, G., Tao, Z. & He, Y. Embryonic reactivation of FLOWERING LOCUS C by ABSCISIC ACID-INSENSITIVE 3 establishes the vernalization requirement in each Arabidopsis generation. Plant Cell 34, 2205–2221 (2022).
Curtis, M. D. & Grossniklaus, U. A gateway cloning vector set for high-throughput functional analysis of genes in planta. Plant Physiol. 133, 462–469 (2003).
Acknowledgements
We thank P. Zhu and C. Dean for providing FRI-GFP seeds. We acknowledge support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos 31830049 and 31721001) and the Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.H. conceived the study. Z.Z., X.L. and Y.Y. conducted the experiments. Y.H. wrote the paper with help from Z.Z. and X.L.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 Characterization of COOLAIR promoter deletion lines and functional analysis of FRI-GFP.
a, Genomic sequences around the 322-bp promoter deletion in the ΔCOOLAIR-2 line. Notably, there is a 37-bp insertion at +5919. b, COOLAIR expression is eliminated in the COOLAIR promoter deletion lines. Shown is a biologically-independent repeat experiment of Fig. 1b. c–f, Relative FRI (c,e) and FLC (d,f) expression in the indicated seedlings. Transcript levels of FRI and FLC (spliced) were normalized to PP2A. Relative expression to FRI-Col is presented. Individual data points are shown. Error bars for s.d. of three biological replicates. g, Relative levels of spliced FLC transcripts upon 42-d cold exposure. 5-d post cold, return to warmth for 5 d after 42-d constant cold exposure. Error bars for s.d. of three biological replicates.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Z., Luo, X., Yang, Y. et al. Cold induction of nuclear FRIGIDA condensation in Arabidopsis. Nature 619, E27–E32 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06189-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06189-z
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.