σ-Aromaticity in planar pentacoordinate aluminium and gallium clusters

Kalita, Amlan J.; Sarmah, Kangkan; Yashmin, Farnaz; Borah, Ritam R.; Baruah, Indrani; Deka, Rinu P.; Guha, Ankur K.

doi:10.1038/s41598-022-14430-4

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 16 June 2022

σ-Aromaticity in planar pentacoordinate aluminium and gallium clusters

Amlan J. Kalita¹,
Kangkan Sarmah¹,
Farnaz Yashmin¹,
Ritam R. Borah¹,
Indrani Baruah¹,
Rinu P. Deka¹ &
…
Ankur K. Guha¹

Scientific Reports volume 12, Article number: 10041 (2022) Cite this article

7 Citations
1 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Planar hypercoordinate structures are gaining immense attention due to the shift from common paradigm. Herein, our high level ab initio calculations predict that planar pentacoordinate aluminium and gallium centres in Cu₅Al²⁺ and Cu₅Ga²⁺ clusters are global minima in their singlet ground states. These clusters are thermodynamically and kinetically very stable. Detailed electronic structure analyses reveal the presence of σ-aromaticity which is the driving force for the stability of the planar form.

Carbon-free sandwich compounds based on arsenic and antimony with icosahedral metal cores

Article 20 February 2023

Stabilizing a metalloid {Zn12} unit within a polymetallide environment in [K2Zn20Bi16]6−

Article Open access 12 October 2020

Quantum chemical insights into hexaboride electronic structures: correlations within the boron p-orbital subsystem

Article Open access 22 August 2022

Introduction

Introducing new chemical structures is one of the most important goals in chemistry. Challenging the known dogma of chemical structure has always been fascinating in chemical community. One such example of rule breaking structure is the case of planar tetracoordinate carbon (ptC) which was first convincingly proposed in 1968 to exist in planar D_4h transition states between tetrahedral enantiomers of simple substituted methane¹. This observation led Hoffmann, Alder, and Wilcox in 1970 to explore the electronic feature for the stabilization of such ptCs by using molecular orbital theory². However, ab initio study revealed that isolation of planar methane is impossible as the energy difference between the planar and tetrahedral form is³ 130 kcal/mol. The first global minimum ptCs were predicted in 1976 on some Li-substituted ptC molecules and 1,1-dilithiocyclopropane and 3,3-dilithio-cyclopropene molecules⁴. The first experimental evidence of ptC came in the year⁵ 1977. Since then many planar penta- (ppC), hexa- (phC) and hepta-coordinate (p7C) carbon were computationally explored^{6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15}. For example, in 2008, the first ppC, CAl₅⁺ was experimentally characterized and theoretically found to be global minima¹⁴. Similarly, the first phC, B₆C² was proposed by Schleyer et al.¹¹ however, the latter study revealed that carbon avoids planar hypercoordination¹². The true global minimum containing a phC was recently proposed¹⁵ which contain a planar hexacoordinate carbon atom surrounded by ligands with half covalent and half ionic bonding. Such achievements of novel hypercoordinate carbon (hpC) molecules have created a new dogma in present day chemistry that highest coordination number of carbon in no longer four.

These studies have also inspired the quest for other systems containing planar hypercoordinate main group elements such as group 13 elements. The first molecule containing planar hexacoordinate boron (phB) was predicted in¹⁶ 1991 which triggered further examples of hypercoordinate boron^{16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28}. Zhai et al.²⁰ reported experimental and theoretical evidence of perfectly planar B₈^- and B₉^- anions clusters with hepta and octa-coordinate boron atom. Theoretical study by Yu et al.²⁶ revealed that B₆H₅⁺ cation is aromatic with a planar pentacoordinate boron (ppB) centre. We have also recently reported a phB species, BBe₆H₆⁺ cluster featuring double aromaticity²⁷. Unlike B, its heavier analogues (Al and Ga) received little attention in the realm of planar hypercoordination. Schleyer and co-workers had shown that there is a dramatic drop in the energy of lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) upon planarization of²⁸ AlH₄⁻. Experimental realization of ptAl species has been reported^29,30. Averkiev et al.³¹ have made an in silico prediction of planar nonacoordinate aluminum centre, AlB₉, based on previously proved doubly aromatic boron clusters²⁰. All boron planar aromatic clusters has also been studied by both theoretically and experimentally^32,33. A cluster containing a phAl in the global minimum form of Al₄C₆ cluster was also reported³⁴. Similarly, recent theoretical study has also reported a thermodynamically and kinetically stable phGa species³⁵. Despite of these achievements, reports on planar pentacoordinate Al and Ga centres (ppAl and ppGa) in isolated clusters are extremely rare. Herein, we report the global minimum of ppAl and ppGa centres in isolated binary clusters, Cu₅Al²⁺ and Cu₅Ga²⁺. The proposed ppAl and ppGa clusters are found to be thermodynamically and kinetically stable and possess double aromaticity.

Computational details

In order to explore systematically the potential energy surface of the title compound, ABCluster code^36,37 in combination with M06-2X/TZVP level³⁸ has been adopted which produced 30 stationary points. For the exploration of the potential energy surface, both the singlet and triplet states were considered. Full optimization of the low lying isomers was done using M06-2X/def2-TZVP level. The motivation towards using M06-2X functional is due to the fact that this functional has been used to explore potential energy surface of planar pentacoordinate nitrogen (ppN)³⁹, planar hexacoordinate boron (ppB)²⁷ and ppM (M = Zn, Cd, Hg)⁴⁰. Moreover, to investigate the artifact of the level of theory used, we have further optimized the local minima ppAl and ppGa structures at TPSSh⁴¹ and PBE0⁴² level. All these provided minimum energy structures with large value of the lowest vibrational frequency (Table S1, supporting information). Hence, the discussion in the text will be based on M06-2X results unless otherwise noted. The energies were then refined by running single point calculations at CCSD(T)/def2-TZVP level of theory on M06-2X optimized geometries. Vibrational harmonic frequency calculations were also performed at M06-2X/def2-TZVP level to confirm that the structures are true minima. All these calculations were performed using Gaussian16 suite of programs⁴³. The electronic structure of the molecules were analyzed using natural bond orbital (NBO)⁴⁴ calculations at M06-2X/def2-TZV level. ETS-NOCV analysis were performed at M06-2X/def2-TZVP level considering cationic Al and Ga (triplet) and triplet Cu₅⁺ as ΔE_orb for these fragmentation is the least and hence the best choice^45,46. In addition, adaptive natural density partitioning (AdNDP)⁴⁷, quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM)⁴⁸ and electron localization function (ELF)^49,50 were also analyzed at M06-2X/def2-TZV level using Multiwfn program code⁵¹. To quantify the aromaticity, nucleus independent chemical shift calculations (NICS)⁵² were performed by placing a ghost atom (symbol Bq) at the geometric mean of the Cu-Al-Cu and Cu-Ga-Cu rings and with an incremental distance of 0.2 Å above the ring upto a distance of 2 Å.

Results and discussion

Figure 1 shows the optimized geometries of the global minima of Cu₅Al²⁺ and Cu₅Ga²⁺ along with their low energy isomers calculated at CCSD(T)/def2-TZVP//M06-2X/def2-TZVP level. The global minima of Cu₅Al²⁺ (¹A) and Cu₅Ga²⁺ (¹G) clusters feature D_5h symmetry in their singlet spin ground states. The Cu-Al distance in ¹A is 2.481 Å (Wiberg bond index is 0.512) while the Cu-Cu distance is 2.917 Å (WIB is 0.052). Similarly, the Cu-Ga distance in ¹G is 2.500 Å (WIB is 0.492) and Cu-Cu distances are in the range 2.932–2.942 Å (WIBs are in the range (0.045–0.048). The computed natural charges using NBO method reveals a negative charge of − 1.28e and − 1.37e for the central Al and Ga atoms respectively while Cu atoms are significantly positive. This implies a significant amount of charge donation from the Cu₅ unit to the central Al and Ga atoms. Moreover, the attraction between these opposite charges may result in high degree of electrostatic interaction which may also account for the stability of these clusters.

The detailed electronic structure of the global minima has been studied using natural bonding orbital (NBO) analysis⁴⁴. Figure 2 shows the frontier Kohn–Sham orbitals along with their energies in eV. The HOMO in each case is a doubly degenerate σ orbital consisting of Cu–Cu and Cu–Al/Ga bonds while the HOMO-1 encompasses the whole ring. These three sets of σ molecular orbitals (MOs) are responsible for showing σ-aromaticity according to Hückel (4n + 2) rule. However, there is no occupied π MOs which suggests absence of any π-aromaticity in these clusters. The calculated HOMO–LUMO gaps of these clusters are significant which may account for the stability of the singlet spin states of these clusters. The electronic structure of these clusters is exactly similar to that of σ-aromatic Au₅Zn⁺ cluster⁵³.

We then turned our attention to investigate the electronic structure of the ppAl and ppGa structures using adaptive natural density partitioning (AdNDP) scheme⁴⁷. AdNDP partitions the electron density in n-centre n-electron bonds and is very helpful in understanding the presence of multicentre bonds⁴⁷. Figure 3 shows the bonds recovered using AdNDP analysis of Cu₅Al²⁺ cluster as a representative case. AdNDP locates five d orbitals (1c–2e) on each Cu atom with occupation number of 1.99 |e| and three 6c–2e Cu–Al σ bonds which may result in σ-aromaticity in the ring. AdNDP analysis reveals the absence of π bonds and hence, certifies the absence of π aromaticity. The nature of Cu–Al and Cu–Ga bonds have been further analyzed within the realm of quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM)⁴⁸ and electron localization function (ELF)^49,50. The Cu-Al and Cu-Ga bonds are characterized by significant presence of electron density ρ (0.04 a.u) at the bond critical points, negative value of Laplacian of electron density ∇²ρ, negative value of local electronic energy density, H(r) and significant value of electron localization function (ELF) (Table 1). All these topological parameters refer to covalent character of the Cu–Al and Cu–Ga bonds. The Laplacian plot of electron density and electron localization function (Fig. 4) in the molecular plane clearly reveals significant electron delocalization.

Table 1 Electron density (ρ) at the bond critical points, Laplacian of electron density (∇ρ²), total electronic energy density (H(r)) and natural charges (q) in |e|.

Full size table

Again, to further quantify the strength of Cu–Al and Cu–B bonds, we carried out extended-transition state method for energy decomposition analysis combined with natural orbital of chemical valence (ETS-NOCV) (Fig. 5)^45,46. The ETS-NOCV analysis suggests significant covalent nature of Cu–Al and Cu–Ga bonds. The NOCV pair densities were generated by considering two fragments, Al⁺ and Ga⁺ in triplet state and Cu₅⁺ in triplet state. Suppl. Table S2 provides the numerical results of ETS-NOCV considering Al, Ga and Cu₅ in different charges and electronic states as interacting fragments. Inspection of the relative size of ΔE_orb value reveal that the most reasonable fragmentation scheme is Al and Ga in cationic triplet state with ns¹np¹_⊥ forming an electron-sharing π bond with the triplet Cu₅⁺ state. This fragmentation provides the best description of ETS-NOCV as these fragments give the lowest ΔE_orb value. Apart from ³Al⁺/³ Ga⁺ → ³Cu₅⁺ σ-donation, a significant amount of ³Cu₅⁺ → ³Al⁺/³Ga⁺ σ-backdonation is also evident in the analysis. In addition, a significant amount of ³Cu₅⁺ → ³Al⁺/³Ga⁺ π-donation is also found. These ³Cu₅⁺ → ³Al⁺/³Ga⁺ donations account for the negative charges at central Al and Ga atoms.

For the quantify the aromaticity in the ppAl and ppGa global minima, we have performed nucleus independent chemical shift (NICS)⁵² calculations. NICS calculations are shown in Fig. 6. Significant negative values of the NICS_ZZ are found in the molecular plane and upto 2 Å above the molecular plane. This suggests the presence significant diatropic ring current and hence aromaticity in these clusters. The presence of σ-aromaticity has also been reported for planar tetracoordinate fluorine atom where “localization” played a vital role than delocalization⁵⁴. Similar situation has also been reported of ppSi and ppGe clusters⁵⁵.

To investigate the dynamic stability of these clusters, we performed Born–Oppenheimer molecular dynamics (BOMD) simulations for a time period of 25 ps (Fig. 7). with a step size of 0.5 fs from the equilibrium global minimum structure with random velocities assigned to the atoms according to a Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution for one temperature, and then normalized so that the net moment for the entire system is zero. The BOMD calculations were performed at room temperature (298 K) and at elevated temperature (450 K). Figure 7 reveals that these ppAl and ppGa clusters are stable even at elevated temperature within a time frame of 25 ps.

Conclusion

In summary, quantum chemical calculations predict the planar petacoordinate Al and Ga centres in Cu₅Al²⁺ and Cu₅Ga²⁺ are the global minima. These clusters are found to possess σ-aromaticity which may render stability to the planar form. These planar clusters are thermodynamically and kinetically very stable. Planar pentacoordination of other heavier group 13 elements such as In and Tl are not found. Although, the planar form of Cu₅In²⁺ is true local minimum, however, it lies 3.4 kcal/mol higher than the global one (Suppl Figure S1). Planar form of Cu₅Tl²⁺ is a higher order saddle point on the potential energy surface. Thus, it seems that Cu₅ framework provides the best cavity size and electronic feature to stabilize planar form of Al and Ga as they have similar size. We feel that these clusters may be a suitable target for experimental characterization.

Data availability

All the DATA for this work is available with the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

References

Monkhorst, H. J. Activation energy for interconversion of enantiomers containing an asymmetric carbon atom without breaking bonds. Chem. Commun. 18, 1111–1112 (1968).
Google Scholar
Hoffmann, R., Alder, W. & Wilcox, C. F. Planar tetracoordinate carbon. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 92, 4992–4993 (1970).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Vassilev-Galindo, V., Pan, S., Donald, K. J. & Merino, G. Planar pentacoordinate carbons. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2, 0114 (2018).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Collins, J. B. et al. Stabilization of planar tetracoordinate carbon. J. Am. Chem. Soc 98, 5419 (1976).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Cotton, F. A. & Miller, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99, 7886 (1977).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yang, L. M., Ganz, E., Chen, Z. F., Wang, Z. W. & Schleyer, P. V. R. Four decades of the chemistry of planar hypercoordinate compounds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 9468–9501 (2015).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sorger, K. & Schleyer, P. V. R. Planar and inherently non-tetrahedral tetracoordinate carbon: A status repor. J. Mol. Struct. Theochem. 338, 317–346 (1995).
Article Google Scholar
Radom, L. & Rasmussen, D. R. The planar carbon story. Pure Appl. Chem. 70, 1977–1984 (1998).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Siebert, W. & Gunale, A. Compounds containing a planar-tetracoordinate carbon atom as analogues of planar methane. Chem. Soc. Rev. 28, 367–371 (1999).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Keese, R. Carbon flatland: Planar tetracoordinate carbon and fenestranes. Chem. Rev. 106, 4787–4808 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Exner, K. & Schleyer, P. V. R. Planar hexacoordinate carbon: A viable possibility. Science 2000, 290 (1937).
Google Scholar
Averkiev, B. B. et al. Carbon avoids hypercoordination in CB6−, CB62−, and C2B5− planar carbon− boron clusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 9248 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Guo, J. C., Feng, L. Y., Barroso, J., Merino, G. & Zhai, H. Planar or tetrahedral? A ternary 17-electron CBe5H4+ cluster with planar pentacoordinate carbon. Chem. Commun. 56, 8305–8308 (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pei, Y., An, W., Ito, K., Schleyer, P. V. R. & Zeng, X. C. Planar pentacoordinate carbon in CAl5+: A global minimum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 10394–10400 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Perra, L. L. et al. Planar hexacoordinate carbons: Half covalent, half ionic. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202100940 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Bonacic-Koutecky, V. & Fantucci, P. J. Quantum chemistry of small clusters of elements of groups Ia, Ib, and IIa: Fundamental concepts, predictions, and interpretation of experiments. Chem. Rev. 91, 1035 (1991).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gu, F. L., Yang, X. M., Tang, A. C., Jiao, H. J. & Schleyer, P. V. R. Structure and stability of B+ 13 clusters. J. Comput. Chem. 19, 203 (1998).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Rasul, R. & Olah, G. A. Calculational study of the protonation of BXH2 and BX2H (X= F and Cl). structures of BXH3+ and BX2H2+ and their dihydrogen complexes BXH5+ and BX2H4+. Inorg. Chem. 40, 2453–2456 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gribanova, T. N., Minyaev, R. M. & Minkin, V. I. Planar hexacoordinated boron in organoboron compounds: An ab initio study. Mendeleev Commun. 11, 169 (2001).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhai, H. J., Alexandrova, A. N., Birch, K. A., Boldyrev, A. I. & Wang, L. S. Hepta‐and octacoordinate boron in molecular wheels of eight‐and nine‐atom boron clusters: Observation and confirmation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 6004 (2003).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pei, Y. & Zeng, X. C. Probing the planar tetra-, penta-, and hexacoordinate carbon in carbon− boron mixed clusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 2580 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Aihara, J. I., Kanno, H. & Ishida, T. Aromaticity of planar boron clusters confirmed. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 13324 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ricca, A. & Bauschlicher, A. The structure and stability of B n H+ clusters. J. Chem. Phys. 106, 2317 (1997).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Curtiss, L. A. & Pople, J. A. Theroretical study of B2H+ 3, B2H+ 2, and B2H+. J. Chem. Phys. 91, 4809 (1989).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Lee, D. Y. & Martin, J. C. Compounds of pentacoordinate (10-B-5) and hexacoordinate (12-B-6) hypervalent boron. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 5745–5746 (1984).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yu, H. L., Sang, R. L. & Wu, Y. Y. Structure and aromaticity of B6H5+ cation: A novel borhydride system containing planar pentacoordinated boron. J. Phys. Chem. A 113, 3382–3386 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kalita, J., Rohman, S. S., Kashyap, C., Ullah, S. S. & Guha, A. K. Double aromaticity in a BBe 6 H 6+ cluster with a planar hexacoordinate boron structure. Chem. Commun. 56, 12597 (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Krogh-Jespersen, M. B., Chandrasekhar, J., Wuerthwein, E. U., Collins, B. & Schleyer, P. V. R. Molecular orbital study of tetrahedral, planar, and pyramidal structures of the isoelectronic series BH4-, CH4, NH4+, AlH4-, SiH4, and PH4+. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102, 2263–2268 (1980).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ebner, F., Wadepohl, H. & Greb, L. Calix [4] pyrrole aluminate: A planar tetracoordinate aluminum (III) anion and its unusual Lewis acidity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 18009–18012 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Thompson, E. J., Myers, T. W. & Berben, L. A. Synthesis of square-planar aluminum (III) complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 14132–14134 (2014).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Averkiev, B. B. & Boldyrev, A. I. Theoretical design of planar molecules with a nona-and decacoordinate central atom. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 78, 769–773 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Alexandrova, N., Boldyrev, A. I., Zhai, H. J. & Wang, L. S. All-boron aromatic clusters as potential new inorganic ligands and building blocks in chemistry. Coord. Chem. Rev. 250, 2811–2866 (2006).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zubarev, D. & Boldyrev, A. I. Comprehensive analysis of chemical bonding in boron clusters. J. Comput. Chem. 28, 251–268 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, C. L., Xu, H. G., Xu, H. L. & Zheng, W. J. Anion photoelectron spectroscopy and theoretical studies of Al4C6–/0: Global minimum triangle-shaped structures and hexacoordinated aluminum. J. Phys. Chem. A 125, 302–307 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, M., Chen, C., Pan, S. & Cui, Z. Planar hexacoordinate gallium. Chem. Sci. 12, 15067–15076 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, J. & Dolg, M. ABCluster: The artificial bee colony algorithm for cluster global optimization. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 24173–24181 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, J. & Dolg, M. Global optimization of clusters of rigid molecules using the artificial bee colony algorithm. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 3003–3010 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. & Truhlar, D. G. Construction of a generalized gradient approximation by restoring the density-gradient expansion and enforcing a tight Lieb–Oxford bound. Theor. Chem. Acc. 120, 215 (2008).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kalita, K. et al. Double aromaticity in a BBe 6 H 6+ cluster with a planar hexacoordinate boron structure. Inorg. Chem. 59, 17880–17993 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kalita, K. et al. Planar pentacoordinate zinc group elements stabilized by multicentric bonds. Inorg. Chem. 61, 1259–1263 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tao, J., Perdew, J. P., Staroverov, V. N. & Scuseria, G. E. Climbing the density functional ladder: Nonempirical meta–generalized gradient approximation designed for molecules and solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 146401 (2003).
Article ADS PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Adamo, V. B. Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The PBE0 model. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 6158–6170 (1999).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 16, Revision B.01. (Gaussian, Inc., 2016).
Reed, E., Weinhold, F. & Curtiss, L. A. Intermolecular interactions from a natural bond orbital, donor-acceptor viewpoint. Chem. Rev. 88, 899–926 (1998).
Article Google Scholar
Mitoraj, M. P., Michalak, A. & Ziegler, T. A. A combined charge and energy decomposition scheme for bond analysis. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 5, 962–975 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mitoraj, M. P. & Michalak, A. Natural orbitals for chemical valence as descriptors of chemical bonding in transition metal complexes. J. mol. model. 13, 347–355 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zubarev, Y. & Boldyrev, A. I. Developing paradigms of chemical bonding: Adaptive natural density partitioning. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 5207–5217 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bader, R. W. F. Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory (Oxford Univ. Press, 1990).
Google Scholar
Silvi, B. & Savin, A. Classification of chemical bonds based on topological analysis of electron localization functions. Nature 371, 683–686 (1994).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Becke, D. & Edgecombe, K. E. A simple measure of electron localization in atomic and molecular systems. J. Chem. Phys. 92, 5397–5403 (1990).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Lu, T. & Chen, F. Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 33, 580 (2012).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Schleyer, P. V. R., Maerker, C., Dransfeld, A., Jiao, H. & Hommes, N. J. R. V. E. Nucleus-independent chemical shifts: A simple and efficient aromaticity probe. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 6317–6318 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tanaka, H., Neukermans, S., Janssens, E., Silverans, R. E. & Lievens, P. σ aromaticity of the bimetallic Au5Zn+ cluster. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 2862–2863 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Toraya, G. C. et al. Planar tetracoordinate fluorine atoms. Chem. Sci. 12, 6699–6704 (2021).
Article Google Scholar
Wang, M. et al. Planar pentacoordinate silicon and germanium atoms. Chem Commun. 56, 13772–13775 (2020).
Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledges the computational facility of Cotton University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, Advanced Computational Chemistry Centre, Cotton University, Panbazar, Guwahati, Assam, 781001, India
Amlan J. Kalita, Kangkan Sarmah, Farnaz Yashmin, Ritam R. Borah, Indrani Baruah, Rinu P. Deka & Ankur K. Guha

Authors

Amlan J. Kalita
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Kangkan Sarmah
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Farnaz Yashmin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ritam R. Borah
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Indrani Baruah
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Rinu P. Deka
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ankur K. Guha
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.K.; K.S.; F.Y.; R.R.B.; I.B. and R.P.D did the calculations and A.K.G. supervised the project and wrote the original draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ankur K. Guha.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalita, A.J., Sarmah, K., Yashmin, F. et al. σ-Aromaticity in planar pentacoordinate aluminium and gallium clusters. Sci Rep 12, 10041 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14430-4

Download citation

Received: 17 March 2022
Accepted: 17 May 2022
Published: 16 June 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14430-4

This article is cited by

BSinGe4−n+ (n = 0−2): prospective systems containing planar tetracoordinate boron (ptB)
- Prasenjit Das
- Pratim Kumar Chattaraj
Journal of Chemical Sciences (2022)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.