Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Active hole formation in epithelioid tissues

Abstract

The formation of holes in epithelial tissue is essential for development, but it can also be associated with epithelial barrier dysfunction and cancer progression. Here we show that active cell contraction in epithelioid monolayer tissues derived from human embryonic stem cells can spontaneously launch a morphological transition cascade consisting of hole nucleation, coalescence and network formation. Accumulated tissue-level tensile stresses drive hole expansion from isotropic round expansion to local fracture of intercellular junctions. This is followed by fast crack propagation, which is later suppressed by the self-organized supracellular actomyosin ring and accompanied by crack blunting and a fracture-to-rounding transition. During hole coalescence, we find a fracture–slip mechanism that enables layer-by-layer breaking of the multicellular bridge but without inducing excessive cell deformation. Our multiscale theory captures these experimental observations and predicts that substrate rigidity sensing and adhesion of cells compete with cellular contraction to mediate the morphological dynamics. These findings suggest that living tissues may coordinate the mechanics across molecular, cellular and tissue scales to drive topological changes while reducing the risk of mechanical damage to cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Active cell contraction causes hole formation, expansion and network formation in monolayer tissues.
Fig. 2: Multiscale deformable polygon model.
Fig. 3: Crack propagation and blunting during hole expansion.
Fig. 4: Fracture–slip dynamics in monolayer necking and hole coalescence.
Fig. 5: Substrate rigidity and adhesion modulate hole formation and networking.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated in this study are provided within the article and its Supplementary Information files. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

Custom codes used in this work are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Barney, C. W. et al. Cavitation in soft matter. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9157–9165 (2020).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Pfeiffer, P. et al. Heterogeneous cavitation from atomically smooth liquid-liquid interfaces. Nat. Phys. 18, 1431–1435 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Okuda, S. et al. Strain-triggered mechanical feedback in self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis. Sci. Adv. 4, eaau1354 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shahbazi, M. N., Siggia, E. D. & Zernicka-Goetz, M. Self-organization of stem cells into embryos: a window on early mammalian development. Science 364, 948–951 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ishihara, K. et al. Topological morphogenesis of neuroepithelial organoids. Nat. Phys. 19, 177–183 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dumortier, J. G. et al. Hydraulic fracturing and active coarsening position the lumen of the mouse blastocyst. Science 365, 465–468 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan, C. J. et al. Hydraulic control of mammalian embryo size and cell fate. Nature 571, 112–116 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dasgupta, S., Gupta, K., Zhang, Y., Viasnoff, V. & Prost, J. Physics of lumen growth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E4751–E4757 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. McEvoy, E. et al. Feedback between mechanosensitive signaling and active forces governs endothelial junction integrity. Nat. Commun. 13, 7089 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Prakash, V. N., Bull, M. S. & Prakash, M. Motility-induced fracture reveals a ductile-to-brittle crossover in a simple animal’s epithelia. Nat. Phys. 17, 504–511 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Isasti-Sanchez, J., Munz-Zeise, F., Lancino, M. & Luschnig, S. Transient opening of tricellular vertices controls paracellular transport through the follicle epithelium during Drosophila oogenesis. Dev. Cell 56, 1083–1099 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carter, J. A., Hyland, C., Steele, R. E. & Collins, E.-M. S. Dynamics of mouth opening in Hydra. Biophys. J. 110, 1191–1201 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sonam, S. et al. Mechanical stress driven by rigidity sensing governs epithelial stability. Nat. Phys. 19, 132–141 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hellings, P. W. & Steelant, B. Epithelial barriers in allergy and asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 145, 1499–1509 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Soler, A. P. et al. Increased tight junctional permeability is associated with the development of colon cancer. Carcinogenesis 20, 1425–1432 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin, T. A. & Jiang, W. G. Loss of tight junction barrier function and its role in cancer metastasis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1788, 872–891 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brugues, A. et al. Forces driving epithelial wound healing. Nat. Phys. 10, 684–691 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nier, V. et al. Tissue fusion over nonadhering surfaces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 9546–9551 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ben Amar, M. & Wu, M. Re-epithelialization: advancing epithelium frontier during wound healing. J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20131038 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cochet-Escartin, O., Ranft, J., Silberzan, P. & Marcq, P. Border forces and friction control epithelial closure dynamics. Biophys. J. 106, 65–73 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Poujade, M. et al. Collective migration of an epithelial monolayer in response to a model wound. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15988–15993 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ravasio, A. et al. Gap geometry dictates epithelial closure efficiency. Nat. Commun. 6, 7683 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tetley, R. J. et al. Tissue fluidity promotes epithelial wound healing. Nat. Phys. 15, 1195–1203 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu, J. et al. Cellular mechanics of wound formation in single cell layer under cyclic stretching. Biophys. J. 121, 288–299 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Casares, L. et al. Hydraulic fracture during epithelial stretching. Nat. Mater. 14, 343–351 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Watanabe, K. et al. A ROCK inhibitor permits survival of dissociated human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 681–686 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Riento, K. & Ridley, A. J. Rocks: multifunctional kinases in cell behaviour. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 446–456 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Thiele, U., Mertig, M. & Pompe, W. Dewetting of an evaporating thin liquid film: heterogeneous nucleation and surface instability. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2869–2872 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma, A. Many paths to dewetting of thin films: anatomy and physiology of surface instability. Eur. Phys. J. E 12, 397–407 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Reiter, G. Dewetting of highly elastic thin polymer films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 186101 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Thompson, C. V. Solid-state dewetting of thin films. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 42, 399–434 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bonn, D., Eggers, J., Indekeu, J., Meunier, J. & Rolley, E. Wetting and spreading. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 739–805 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ajeti, V. et al. Wound healing coordinates actin architectures to regulate mechanical work. Nat. Phys. 15, 696–705 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Begnaud, S., Chen, T. C., Delacour, D., Mege, R. M. & Ladoux, B. Mechanics of epithelial tissues during gap closure. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 42, 52–62 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Choquet, D., Felsenfeld, D. P. & Sheetz, M. P. Extracellular matrix rigidity causes strengthening of integrin-cytoskeleton linkages. Cell 88, 39–48 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Long, R. & Hui, C.-Y. Crack tip fields in soft elastic solids subjected to large quasi-static deformation—a review. Extreme Mech. Lett. 4, 131–155 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fu, Y., Yin, T., Qu, S. & Yang, W. Cavitation/fracture transition of soft materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 172, 105192 (2023).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Kang, J., Wang, C. & Cai, S. Cavitation to fracture transition in a soft solid. Soft Matter 13, 6372–6376 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Audoly, B. & Hutchinson, J. W. Analysis of necking based on a one-dimensional model. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 97, 68–91 (2016).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Fu, Y. B., Jin, L. S. & Goriely, A. Necking, beading, and bulging in soft elastic cylinders. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 147, 104250 (2021).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Harris, A. R. et al. Characterizing the mechanics of cultured cell monolayers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16449–16454 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Chen, Y. X. et al. Activation of topological defects induces a brittle-to-ductile transition in epithelial monolayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 018101 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang, H. L. et al. Necking and failure of constrained 3D microtissues induced by cellular tension. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20923–20928 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Timoshenko, S. P. & Goodier, J. N. Theory of Elasticity (McGraw-Hill, 1970).

  45. Discher, D. E., Janmey, P. & Wang, Y. L. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310, 1139–1143 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Sunyer, R. et al. Collective cell durotaxis emerges from long-range intercellular force transmission. Science 353, 1157–1161 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Chaudhuri, O., Cooper-White, J., Janmey, P. A., Mooney, D. J. & Shenoy, V. B. Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular behaviour. Nature 584, 535–546 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Bangasser, B. L. et al. Shifting the optimal stiffness for cell migration. Nat. Commun. 8, 15313 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Pallarès, M. E. et al. Stiffness-dependent active wetting enables optimal collective cell durotaxis. Nat. Phys. 19, 279–289 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Chan, C. E. & Odde, D. J. Traction dynamics of filopodia on compliant substrates. Science 322, 1687–1691 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Gong, Z. et al. Matching material and cellular timescales maximizes cell spreading on viscoelastic substrates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E2686–E2695 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Schwarz, U. S. & Safran, S. A. Physics of adherent cells. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1327–1381 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Becker, J. et al. Complex dewetting scenarios captured by thin-film models. Nat. Mater. 2, 59–63 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Hoijman, E., Rubbini, D., Colombelli, J. & Alsina, B. Mitotic cell rounding and epithelial thinning regulate lumen growth and shape. Nat. Commun. 6, 7355 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. Beningo, K. A., Lo, C. M. & Wang, Y. L. Flexible polyacrylamide substrata for the analysis of mechanical interactions at cell-substratum adhesions. Methods Cell. Biol. 69, 325–339 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sabass, B., Gardel, M. L., Waterman, C. M. & Schwarz, U. S. High resolution traction force microscopy based on experimental and computational advances. Biophys. J. 94, 207–220 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. Gutierrez, E. et al. High refractive index silicone gels for simultaneous total internal reflection fluorescence and traction force microscopy of adherent cells. PLoS ONE 6, e23807 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. Lin, S. Z., Ye, S., Xu, G. K., Li, B. & Feng, X. Q. Dynamic migration modes of collective cells. Biophys. J. 115, 1826–1835 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. Saw, T. B. et al. Topological defects in epithelia govern cell death and extrusion. Nature 544, 212–216 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhang, D. Q., Chen, P. C., Li, Z. Y., Zhang, R. & Li, B. Topological defect-mediated morphodynamics of active–active interfaces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2122494119 (2022).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  61. Boromand, A., Signoriello, A., Ye, F. F., O’Hern, C. S. & Shattuck, M. D. Jamming of deformable polygons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 248003 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. Chen, P. C., Feng, X. Q. & Li, B. Unified multiscale theory of cellular mechanical adaptations to substrate stiffness. Biophys. J. 121, 3474–3485 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. Bi, D., Lopez, J. H., Schwarz, J. M. & Manning, M. L. A density-independent rigidity transition in biological tissues. Nat. Phys. 11, 1074–1079 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Elosegui-Artola, A. et al. Rigidity sensing and adaptation through regulation of integrin types. Nat. Mater. 13, 631–637 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China grant nos. 12325209 and 12272202 for B.L. B.L. also thanks the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2022YFF0706100) for supporting this work. X.-Q.F. is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China grant nos. 12032014 and 11921002. Y.S. is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China grant no. U21A20203.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.L. conceived and designed the research. J.-Q.L., Y.-P.C., H.-Y.L., S.-D.W. and J.B. performed experiments. J.-Q.L., P.-C.C., C.-L.L. and B.L. established the theoretical model and carried out numerical simulations. J.-Q.L., Y.-P.C., Y.L., Y.S., X.-Q.F. and B.L. analysed the data. J.-Q.L., Y.-P.C., Y.L., X.-Q.F. and B.L. wrote the paper. B.L. supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Physics thanks Jakub Sedzinski and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Stem cells basically maintain the monolayer structure during the hole formation and expansion.

a, Stem cells maintained the monolayer structure on 0.2 kPa substrate at 24 h after removing Y27632 (from three independent experiments); Left and right panels are representative images from three independent experiments. b, Stem cells maintained the monolayer structure on 1.0 kPa substrate at 24 h after removing Y27632 (from three independent experiments). Left and right panels are representative images from three independent experiments. Scale bar, 50 μm.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Cell contraction induces non-uniform collective cell migration, heterogeneous deformation, and topological defects.

a, Evolution of hole opening (white closed line: the hole profile). Scale bar, 50 μm. b, Velocity field during hole expansion with time. The black arrows indicate the velocity vectors. The color gradients indicate the magnitude of cell speed. c, Tissue-level tensile deformation during hole expansion (brown closed line: the hole profile). The color gradients indicate the magnitude of strain. d, ±1/2 topological defects of cell orientation in monolayers (white closed line: the hole profile; red dot: +1/2 defect; green dot: −1/2 defect). The yellow lines indicate the orientation of cells in phase contrast images. e, Schematic of ±1/2 topological defects (left: +1/2 defect; right: −1/2 defect). f, Colocalization probability of tensile deformation, topological defects, and hole formation position (n = 10 different holes from four independent experiments; mean ± s.d.). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Active cell contraction guides collective cell migration and induces tissue-level tensile deformation in simulations.

a, Evolution of hole opening. Scale bar, 50 μm. b, Velocity field during hole expansion. The arrows indicate cell velocity vectors. c, Tissue-level deformation during hole expansion (black closed line: the hole profile).

Extended Data Fig. 4 Supracellular actomyosin ring modulates hole shape.

a,b, Hole morphologies in simulations with actomyosin ring (a) and without actomyosin ring (b). Scale bar, 50 μm.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Cell shape and area observed in simulations.

a, The hole expansion in a simulation. b, The dependence of cell aspect ratio on the distance from hole edge (n = 7 different holes; mean ± s.d.) in simulations. c, The dependence of cell area on the distance from hole edge (n = 6 different holes; mean ± s.d.) in simulations. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Influence of cell–cell adhesion on hole formation.

ac, Int–ercellular adhesion intensity is 5 × 10−4 N/m (a), 3 × 10−4 N/m (b) and 1 × 10−4 N/m (c) in simulations. Scale bar, 100 μm. df, EDTA was added to reduce intercellular adhesion (from two independent experiments). EDTA concentration was 0 mM (d), 2.5 mM (e) and 3.75 mM (f) in experiment. Scale bar, 200 μm.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Laser ablation experiment was performed to disrupt the contractile ring locally during hole expansion.

Red: cell nucleus, green: cytomembrane, white closed line: the hole profile, yellow arrowhead: laser ablation site. Scale bar, 200 μm.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Necking of multicellular bridge in simulations and cell dynamics during the fracture–slip process.

a, Multicellular bridge becomes thinner and thinner in the middle region, undergoing marked necking until bridge breaking. b, Local displacement during necking. c, Evolution of mean cell speed at the necking position during the fracture–slip process. The red box representes the time point of fracture at the first time. The blue box representes the time point of fracture at the second time. The grey and green shaded areas indicate the fracture and slip process, respectively. d, Relative motion between points A and B (shown in Fig. 4i) during slip in experiments. e, Relative motion between points A and B (shown in Fig. 4j) during slip in simulations. f, The length of cells remained almost unchanged during fracture–slip process in experiments and simulations. The red and blue arrows indicate cell A marked in experiment and simulation, respectively. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 9 Influences of substrate rigidity and adhesion.

a, Initial morphologies of cell monolayers on the substrates with different rigidity after removing Y27632 (0.2 kPa substrate: small holes; 1.0 kPa and 5.0 kPa substrates: confluent monolayers) (from three independent experiments). Scale bar, 200 μm. b, Cell migration speed on substrates coated with different ligand densities of matrigel (n = 6 different views from three independent experiments and n = 3 simulation views; mean ± s.d.). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 10 Hole nucleation, coalescence, and network formation of hES cell monolayers on plastic substrates.

a, Hole nucleation. b, Fracture-to-rounding transition during hole expansion. The yellow arrowhead indicates the site of fracture. c, Hole coalescence. d, Network formation (from three independent experiments). e, Stem cells maintained the monolayer structure during the hole formation and expansion on the plastic substrate (from two independent experiments). Scale bar, 100 μm.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–7, Table 1 and details of the model, experiment, result analysis and calculation of the intercellular stress.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Video 1

Morphological transitions of hES cells on 0.2 kPa PA gels after removal of ROCK inhibitor Y27632. Scale bar, 100 μm.

Supplementary Video 2

Contraction of hES-cell-induced hole nucleation and heterogeneous deformation. Scale bar, 50 μm.

Supplementary Video 3

Simulation of the whole cascade of topological transitions in hES cell monolayers. Scale bar, 100 μm.

Supplementary Video 4

Experimental observation of crack propagation and blunting process. Scale bar, 50 μm.

Supplementary Video 5

Simulation of crack propagation and blunting process. Scale bar, 50 μm.

Supplementary Video 6

Necking localization during hole coalescence observed in experiments. Scale bar, 100 μm.

Supplementary Video 7

Simulations reproduced the hole coalescence and necking localization observed in experiments. Scale bar, 50 μm.

Supplementary Video 8

Direct breaking of multicellular bridge when local tissue deformation was fast. Scale bar, 50 μm.

Source Data for Supplementary Fig. 1

Source data for Supplementary Fig. 1.

Source Data for Supplementary Fig. 6

Source data for Supplementary Fig. 6.

Source Data for Supplementary Fig. 7

Source data for Supplementary Fig. 7.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data for Fig. 1.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data for Fig. 2.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data for Fig. 3.

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data for Fig. 4.

Source Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data for Fig. 5.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 2.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 5.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 8

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 8.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 9

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 9.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lv, JQ., Chen, PC., Chen, YP. et al. Active hole formation in epithelioid tissues. Nat. Phys. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02504-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02504-1

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing