This page has been archived and is no longer updated

 
Types of Genetic Disease 
Unit 3: Chromosomal Disease
Progress
Loading ...

3.1  Somatic Mosaicism and Chromosomal DisordersCitation

 

If made from stones, could two pieces of a mosaic ever be exactly the same? Of course, the answer is no: although certain pieces of the mosaic may appear similar from a distance, a closer look would reveal that no two stones composing the mosaic were exactly the same.
Like stones in a mosaic, our cells may vary. Specifically, they may undergo changes during development such that one group of cells differs from a neighboring group. This phenomenon is known as mosaicism, and it can be caused by spontaneous DNA mutations, spontaneous reversion of an existing DNA mutation, epigenetic changes in chromosomal DNA, and chromosomal abnormalities. Furthermore, mosaicism can be associated with changes in either nuclear or mitochondrial DNA. The phenotypes associated with mosaicism depend on the extent of the mosaic cell population. Mosaicism has important consequences with respect to human disease, and it also results in variations among all humans at the molecular level, even among identical twins.

Germ Line Mosaicism versus Somatic Mosaicism

Diagnostic methods for somatic and germ line mosaicism
© 2002 Nature Publishing Group Youssoufian, H. et al. Mechanisms and consequences of somatic mosaicism in humans. Nature Reviews Genetics 3, 750 (2002). All rights reserved. View Terms of Use
As previously described, mosaicism refers to the presence of a genetically distinct cell population within an organism (Youssoufian & Pyeritz, 2002). Mosaicism can exist in both somatic cells and germ line cells; however, the distinction between germ line mosaicism and somatic mosaicism can be somewhat tricky. As their names imply, somatic and germ line mosaicism refer to the presence of genetically distinct groups of cells within somatic and germ line tissues, respectively.
If the event leading to mosaicism occurs during development, it is possible that both somatic and germ line cells will become mosaic. In this case, both somatic and germ line tissue populations would be affected, and an individual could transmit the mosaic genotype to his or her offspring. Conversely, if the triggering event occurs later in life, it could affect either a germ line or a somatic cell population. If the mosaicism occurs only in a somatic cell population, the phenotypic effect will depend on the extent of the mosaic cell population; however, there would be no risk of passing on the mosaic genotype to offspring. On the other hand, if the mosaicism occurs only in a germ line cell population, the individual would be unaffected, but his or her offspring could be affected.
Figure 1a shows how pedigrees and molecular analyses can be combined to determine whether somatic mosaicism or germ line mosaicism is responsible for disease phenotypes. The first three-generation pedigree shows the inheritance of café au lait spots associated with neurofibromatosis type I, which is typically an autosomal dominant disorder associated with mutations in the NF1 gene. As you can see, two unaffected parents have one son with a café au lait skin lesion. The affected male does not pass on the disorder to any of his four offspring. Molecular analysis of blood and normal skin samples show that these samples carry a wild-type copy of the NF1 gene, whereas the café au lait skin lesion of the affected male contains a wild-type and a mutant copy of the NF1 gene, which is suggestive of a somatic mosaic mutation in this population of skin cells.
The second pedigree (Figure 1b) shows the inheritance of tuberous sclerosis, which is typically an autosomal disorder associated with mutations in the TSC1 or TSC2 gene. In this pedigree, you can see that unaffected parents have one affected son, one affected daughter, and one unaffected son. This pattern of inheritance is consistent with an autosomal recessive disorder in which both parents are carriers, or with germ line mosaicism in one parent. Molecular analysis of blood samples shows that both parents are homozygous for the wild-type TSC1 allele, suggesting that they are not typical heterozygous carriers. Blood samples from the affected children show that both are heterozygous for the mutant TSC1 allele, whereas the unaffected son carries only the wild-type TSC1 allele. Analysis of germ line (sperm) cells from the males in the pedigree shows that the father and the affected son carry the mutant TSC1 allele. Taken together, these results suggest that the father has undergone a germ line mosaic mutation such that some of his sperm cells carry the mutant TSC1 allele.
Scitable by Nature Education Nature Education Home Learn More About Faculty Page Students Page Feedback