Now that you have put your knowledge of understanding communication to the test, try your hand at these learning activities.
A1 — Make an inventory of the ways in which you
communicate primarily with yourself about your work, through laboratory
notebooks, graphs, mathematical or chemical formulas, a preliminary version
(not shown to others) of documents or slides, and so on. Evaluate your
satisfaction with this communication in terms of both quantity and quality.
Specifically, evaluate its usefulness after a while — can you understand the
notes or graphs you made months or years ago, and can you understand the
reasons for making them? How can you improve the communication with yourself
about your work?
A2 — Make a high-level inventory of the scientific
communication for which you were part of the audience within the past six
months or past year: the journals or magazines you read, the Web sites you
consulted, the presentations you attended, and so on. For each item in this
inventory, characterize yourself as an audience. Do you consider yourself
specialized or less specialized in the topic or field discussed? Were you a primary
reader or a secondary one? If possible, think of what a similar inventory would
have looked like a few years ago. In what sense were you a different audience
than you are now?
A3 — In the previous inventory or simply in
recent months, think of all the communication instances that have frustrated or
possibly offended you as an audience member. For each, try to identify the
reason for your frustration. Was the content too complicated? (Did you perhaps
feel excluded as a nonspecialist?) Was the structure confusing? Was the tone
inappropriate?