This page has been archived and is no longer updated

 
September 11, 2013 | By:  Alexis Rudd
Aa Aa Aa

Monofilament in the Ocean

On my way home from work the other day I heard a story on the radio about a young sea turtle that had been found on the beach in Kauai. It had two broken flippers. In addition, both flippers had cuts slicing through both the scales and muscles, down into the bone.

It wasn't a knife or a fist that injured this gorgeous animal. It wasn't even a predator, like a shark. No, the cause of the terrible injuries that led to the turtle's death was a single fiber of plastic that was so tangled in its flippers that it sliced through muscle and snapped bones.

.

You can see why monofilament fishing line is one of my least favorite things ever.

Monofilament fishing line is made of a single plastic line, and has been popular for fishing since the 1950s (although the first plastic fishing lines were introduced in 1939). This type of fishing line is useful for fishermen because it is strong, durable, and virtually invisible underwater.

These same characteristics make it particularly deadly to wildlife; because it is strong, ocean animals can't break free, because it is invisible, they can't avoid it, and because it is durable, lost monofilament lines and nets can take as many as 600 years to degrade. These lost nets continue to catch fish, turtles, sharks, seals, whales, and scuba divers for many years. They are called "ghost nets." The name conjures up two types of ghosts in my mind; first, the invisible fishermen holding the net, and second, the ghosts of the many animals who have been trapped in it.

In addition to trapping animals, plastic lines get tangled around reefs and damage the coral and other creatures living on the ocean floor. Even a small amount of lost fishing line can get tangled in a coral head, killing the polyps of the coral.


.

Discarded monofilament lines can even wreak havoc out of the water. It is almost as hard to see monofilament in the air. I've gotten tripped up on invisible fishing lines on the beach several times, where they can be very hazardous to marine birds.



.

So what can we do about the dangers of plastic lines in the ocean?

First of all, we can reduce the amount of lines and nets that are left behind and lost. This means that recreational fishermen, snorkelers, and other beachgoers should pick up lines from the shores, and commercial fishermen should take measures not to lose nets. Many places now offer monofilament-recycling stations for this purpose. But even more important, plastic lines should be replaced by a material that degrades more quickly. Fortunately, fishing lines that degrade in five years (or about 0.8% of the time it takes traditional plastic line) are starting to become available. These lines are more expensive, but their environmental cost is much less.

Do you have any more ideas for decreasing the amount of monofilament in the ocean?


3 Comments
Comments
September 19, 2013 | 02:37 AM
Posted By:  Jose Ingles
ghost fishing by gillnets arguably do the most harm because of its use in many tropical small scale fisheries. Governments are even providing subsidies and promoting its use. Thus, the first suggestion will be for governments not to subsidize and to refrain from promoting gillnets as part of the livelihood program. there are other gears to replace gillnet use.as an example, in the gillnet crab fisheries of the Philippines, a mayor of a coastal town promoted the use of pots woven out of bamboos. This has generated a lot of jobs as there are the suppliers of bamboo, the wives became the weavers of the pots etc. More importantly, it eliminated ghost fishing of lost gillnets whose catch was estimated to be 20% of the total annual landings!

another way is for fishing gear technologists to promote the construction of gillnets where highly degrable material are placed at specific locations that will allow the nets to fold and collapse and not capable of catching other organisms once lost.
September 18, 2013 | 08:22 PM
Posted By:  Nature Education
Sedeer- agree that material type and subsidization of the new types could be a good motivator for reducing the tangle events out there. But I am also thinking about other large scale intervention...

These monfilaments are acting like hazzardous waste in water ecosystems, so what if we treat them as such, and make users responsible to labeling and disposing responsibly?

What if fishing industries were regulated in a way that made them responsible for all net material? This way nets wouldn't be abandoned or lost. Nets that go out in boats must come back in, always (on some schedule/rotation), and this schedule and tracking would be would be audited. This way nets would always be accounted for, rather than discarded or abandoned when to difficult to retrieve or hunt down. If the users of nets were responsible for lost nets, and fined heavily for abandoning them, this might reduce the amount of material out there. Make it a huge downside to lose or abandon a net. Make it $$$$$.

So this requires some tagging technology for nets. But couldn't there be some way to tag monofilaments so they are retrievable, locatable via GPS or radio wave transmitters? I know it might sound expensive but there are tons of RFID tags used on other devices, and they aren't expensive. Used in lots of field work applications. What does everyone think?

September 16, 2013 | 08:06 PM
Posted By:  Sedeer el-Showk
Do the new lines have the same useful properties as the plastic (strength, etc)? Maybe this is an area where government involvement (eg, subsidizing the quicker-degrading lines) would be a good approach?
Blogger Profiles
Recent Posts

« Prev Next »

Connect
Connect Send a message

Scitable by Nature Education Nature Education Home Learn More About Faculty Page Students Page Feedback



Blogs