This page has been archived and is no longer updated

 
May 29, 2013 | By:  Bruce Braun
Aa Aa Aa

A Possible Answer to Fermi’s Paradox: Gamma-Bursts


"Where is everybody?"


That's the question of Fermi's Paradox, the seemingly bizarre contradiction between some estimates of a high probability of sea-faring civilizations in the galaxy, and the complete lack of any sign of them. In other words, if there should be countless worlds out there where life evolved and intelligence could develop, then why is it none of them have ever visited Earth? It seems only natural that a civilization like our own, given enough time, would travel through the cosmos, yet, there is still no confirmable sign of them. Now, a paradox is, of course, logically unresolvable unless we adjust some the facts we assume. In this case, the previously optimistic estimates could be adjusted when you include the possibility of gamma-bursts. Indeed, the frequency of these events may well answer our puzzling paradox.

Gamma-bursts are intense flashes of highly energetic gamma-rays unleashed during a supernova explosion, perhaps one of the most catastrophic phenomena in the universe. This extreme radiation has been suggested as possibly initiating the late Ordovician extinction event on Earth in the deep past, and possibly threaten Earth's future. When the beams arrive, they would affect the atmosphere on a chemical level, depleting the ozone and subsequently have lasting impacts on the food chain and biosphere. Damage to the ozone layer increases the penetration of the far more common deadly [to life] cosmic rays which emanate throughout the galaxy. The flashes themselves could damage nature's most radiation-resistant organisms, such as the bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans, a species which is able to resist 3000 times the level of radiation that a human being can endure. A gamma-ray burst would be able to tear its genome to shreds from the inside out, and from a distance (if the planet had a thin atmosphere) of up to three times the width of our galaxy.

Clearly, these events are bad news for biased biological beings such as ourselves. If they were to happen too frequently, or at the wrong time at a critical point in a planet's evolution, they could delay the arrival of intelligence, or prevent its arrival entirely. When thinking about the likelihood of other civilizations, the frequency with which these death-rays transpire needs to be considered in conjunction with a probable timeline of the evolution of intelligence. This is exactly what cosmologist James Annis has considered. He put forward an astrophysical model of a phase transition between a time when the galaxy was devoid of intelligent life, and a time when it should be full of intelligent life. According to his data, the Milky Way galaxy is currently on the cusp of this transition towards a time that life can flourish and evolve. The idea is that we're now entering a time where the frequency of gamma-ray bursts is finally low enough to allow life more freedom to evolve, as opposed to before where the frequency was higher, and a would-be intelligent species would have been prevented from rising by the radiation onslaught. Thus, the diminishing rate of the frequencies of gamma-bursts could serve as physical mechanism that allows life to prosper.

So, according to Annis, the reason for the great silence is that intelligent life has only recently (in a cosmologic scale) been given the chance to speak. Certainly, this adjusts the premises of Fermi's Paradox, which gives a much greater timescale (in the billions and billions of years) for life to spread and contact one another. The Paradox assumes other intelligent life has had plenty of time to contact us. In reality, it could be the case that they're unable to, or just starting to explore space, or as Annis postulates, the planet they're on hasn't developed intelligence just quite yet! Developments in astrophysics shedding light on humanity's aloneness in the universe? Now that's cool stuff.

--

1. Melott. A. et al. Did a gamma-ray burst initiate the late Ordovician mass extinction?. International Journal of Astrobiology 3, 55-61 (2004).

2. World Science. Death from across the galaxy. (2010)

3. Annis. J. An astrophysical explanation for the "great silence". Journal of the British Interplanetary Society. 52, 19-20 (1999).

Image credit: Dana Berry (Via NASA)

3 Comments
Comments
June 26, 2013 | 06:22 PM
Posted By:  Bruce Braun
The current estimates for the high probability of civilizations making it to outer space are mostly based on conjecture. As you implied, it is possible that an extraplanetary "colonization" process is, for some reason, unlikely. Carl Sagan was often concerned that technological civilizations, taking billions to arise to arise, may "snuff themselves out in an instant of unforgivable neglect". Certainly 20th century Earth, held hostage to the threat of nuclear death by its two major powers, and the environmental threats of the 21st century, are not very reassuring examples of the safe usage of higher technology. Surely, if there have been/are/will be, other civilizations in the universe, that a portion of them wipe themselves out. It's the great cosmic tragedy that we often take for granted.

My own opinion on it is that we can never really be sure, but we can be more hopeful towards the chances of extraterrestrial success if we attain it ourselves, which only happens one day at a time.
June 26, 2013 | 06:19 PM
Posted By:  Bruce Braun
The reason behind the decline in gamma ray bursts is a bit beyond my understanding, but the best I can tell is that it has to do with star formation rate. There doesn't seem to be much actual science in the way of protecting us from them, but in my research I found some ideas for a "Dyson Shield". There seems to be a bit of conflicting information over whether gamma-ray-bursts are a threat to life at all, it seems. Here is an article which talks about how they only tend to occur in "metal poor" galaxies, and how planets only tend to form in "metal rich" galaxies like our own.

http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2006/apr/20/metals-protect-milky-way-from-gamma-ray-bursts

Either scenario only means good news for the possibility of extraterrestrial intelligence, though!

May 31, 2013 | 07:05 AM
Posted By:  Sedeer el-Showk
Neat! Is there a reason for the decline in gamma ray bursts? Is there any kind of celestial phenomenon that might protect an area from them -- some kind of shield that would create a safe haven for life?

Also, how well do the high probability estimates account for the possibility that civilizations similar to ours may not make it out into space? We haven't gotten that far yet and we're doing a good job of depleting our resources, so who knows? Of course, we're also beaming stuff out into space , but you'd have to be pretty dose to have received anything.
Blogger Profiles

Connect
Connect Send a message

Scitable by Nature Education Nature Education Home Learn More About Faculty Page Students Page Feedback



Blogs