Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:

Role of direct interaction in BRCA1 inhibition of estrogen receptor activity

Abstract

The BRCA1 gene was previously found to inhibit the transcriptional activity of the estrogen receptor [ER-α] in human breast and prostate cancer cell lines. In this study, we found that breast cancer-associated mutations of BRCA1 abolish or reduce its ability to inhibit ER-α activity and that domains within the amino- and carboxyl-termini of the BRCA1 protein are required for the inhibition. BRCA1 inhibition of ER-α activity was demonstrated under conditions in which a BRCA1 transgene was transiently or stably over-expressed in cell lines with endogenous wild-type BRCA1 and in a breast cancer cell line that lacks endogenous functional BRCA1 (HCC1937). In addition, BRCA1 blocked the expression of two endogenous estrogen-regulated gene products in human breast cancer cells: pS2 and cathepsin D. The BRCA1 protein was found to associate with ER-α in vivo and to bind to ER-α in vitro, by an estrogen-independent interaction that mapped to the amino-terminal region of BRCA1 (ca. amino acid 1-300) and the conserved carboxyl-terminal activation function [AF-2] domain of ER-α. Furthermore, several truncated BRCA1 proteins containing the amino-terminal ER-α binding region blocked the ability of the full-length BRCA1 protein to inhibit ER-α activity. Our findings suggest that the amino-terminus of BRCA1 interacts with ER-α, while the carboxyl-terminus of BRCA1 may function as a transcriptional repression domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chapman MS and Verma IM. . 1996 Nature 382: 678–679.

  • Chen Y, Lee WH and Chew HK. . 1999 J. Cell. Physiol. 181: 385–392.

  • Chlebowski RT. . 2000 N. Engl. J. Med. 343: 191–198.

  • Dignam JD, Lebovitz RM and Roeder RG. . 1983 Nucleic Acids Res. 5: 1475–1489.

  • Fan S, Wang J-A, Meng Q, Yuan R-Q, Ma YX, Erdos MR, Pestell RG, Yuan F, Auborn KJ, Goldberg ID and Rosen EM. . 1999 Science 284: 1354–1356.

  • Fan S, Wang J-A, Yuan R-Q, Ma YX, Meng Q, Goldberg ID and Rosen EM. . 1998 Oncogene 16: 3069–3083.

  • Faust PL, Kornfeld S and Chirgwin JM. . 1985 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 4910–4914.

  • Ford D, Easton DF, Bishop DT, Narod SA and Goldgar DE. . 1994 Lancet 343: 692–695.

  • Friedman LS, Ostermeyer EA, Szabo CI, Dowd P, Lynch ED, Rowell SE and King MC. . 1994 Nat. Genet. 8: 399–404.

  • Henttu PMA, Kalkhoven E and Parker MG. . 1998 Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 1832–1839.

  • Jeltsch JM, Robers C, Shatz JM, Garnier JM, Brown AM and Chambon P. . 1987 Nucleic Acids Res. 15: 1401–1414.

  • Loman N, Johannsson O, Bendahl PO, Borg A, Ferno M and Olsson H. . 1998 Cancer 83: 310–319.

  • Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, Futreal PA, Harshman K, Tavtigian S, Liu Q, Cichran C, Bennett LM, Ding W. . 1994 Science 266: 66–71.

  • Monteiro AN, August A and Hanafusa H. . 1996 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 13595–13599.

  • Streuwing JP, Hartge P, Wacholder S, Baker SM, Berlin M, McAdams M, Timmerman MM, Brody LC and Tucker MA. . 1997 New Engl. J. Med. 336: 1401–1408.

  • Tirkonnen M, Johannson O, Agnarsson BA, Olsson H, Ingvar-sson S, Karbu R, Tanner M, Isola J, Barkardottir RB, Borg A and Kallioniemi OP. . 1997 Cancer Res. 57: 1222–1227.

  • Wang CY, Petryniak B, Thompson CB, Kaelin WG and Leiden JM. . 1993 Science 260: 1330–1335.

  • Webb P, Nguyen P, Shinsako J, Anderson C, Feng W, Nguyen MP, Chen D, Huang SM, Subramanian S, McKinerney E, Katzenellenbogen BS, Stallcup MR and Kushner PJ. . 1998 Mol. Endocrinol. 12: 1605–1618.

  • Webber MM, Bello D and Quader S. . 1997 Prostate 30: 58–64.

  • Yarden RI and Brody LC. . 1999 BRCA1 interacts with components of the histone deacetylase complex Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 4893–4988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu X, Wu LC, Bowcock AM, Aronheim A and Baer R. . 1998 J. Biol. Chem. 273: 25388–25392.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supported, in part, by USPHS grants R01-ES09169, R01-82599, and RO1-80000 (EMR.), the Elsa U Pardee Cancer Foundation of Michigan (EMR), the New York State Department of Health (EMR), US Army Breast Cancer grant DAMD17-99-1-9254 (EM Rosen), the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation (RG Pestell), and USPHS grants RO1-CA75503 and R01-CA70897 (RG Pestell).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fan, S., Ma, Y., Wang, C. et al. Role of direct interaction in BRCA1 inhibition of estrogen receptor activity. Oncogene 20, 77–87 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1204073

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1204073

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links