Year in Review in 2015

Filter By:

Article Type
Year
  • Improved neuroimaging and molecular markers of Alzheimer disease (AD) have aided diagnosis of AD in the very early stages, and have facilitated differential diagnosis between AD and other neurodegenerative disorders with dementia. The finding that some older individuals can show amyloid-β pathology while remaining cognitively intact raises important questions regarding prevention strategies.

    • Agneta Nordberg
    Year in Review
  • The past year saw the 40th anniversary of the Glasgow Coma Scale, which continues to be effective for monitoring patients with traumatic brain injury. Three new clinical trials were completed, but none revealed beneficial interventions. These failures have prompted exploration of more-subtle therapy targets, novel disease classifications and collaborative research paradigms.

    • David K. Menon
    • Andrew I. R. Maas
    Year in Review
  • Scientific progress in multiple sclerosis (MS) research spanned a number of areas in 2014, including therapeutics, disease classification, risk management, and disease mechanisms. Advances were particularly notable in the field of progressive MS. Altogether, the findings move us one step closer to a better understanding of this complex disease.

    • Jiwon Oh
    • Paul W. O'Connor
    Year in Review
  • In 2014, novel, large-scale collaborative efforts and frameworks resulted in major advances in the epilepsy field, from publication of a new definition of epilepsy to important discoveries regarding aetiology, pathophysiology and management. These collaborative works provide a platform from which further advances are anticipated, and a model for future research.

    • Piero Perucca
    • Terence J. O'Brien
    Year in Review
  • Genetic revelations in 2014 are testing traditional classification systems for movement disorders, and our approach to clinical diagnostics. Mutations in dystonia-associated genes lead to a spectrum of disorders with different phenotypes, underscoring the need for stringent clinical phenotyping of patients with movement disorders, as well as next-generation sequencing approaches.

    • Tom J. de Koning
    • Marina A. J. Tijssen
    Year in Review