Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Surgery

KRAS mutations and hepatic recurrence after treatment of colorectal liver metastases

Non-anatomical resection of colorectal liver metastases is the current preferred approach to maximize sparing of the hepatic parenchyma. A new study raises the question of whether resection in patients with KRAS-mutated colorectal liver metastases should be performed along segmental, anatomical lines to reduce the risk of local liver recurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: CT imaging of a RAS-mutant colorectal liver metastasis.

References

  1. Shindoh, J. et al. Complete removal of the tumor-bearing portal territory decreases local tumor recurrence and improves disease-specific survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 64, 594–600 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zorzi, D. et al. Comparison between hepatic wedge resection and anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 10, 86–94 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pawlik, T. M. et al. Effect of surgical margin status on survival and site of recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Ann. Surg. 241, 715–722 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Margonis, G. A. et al. Anatomical resections improve disease-free survival in patients with KRAS-mutated colorectal liver metastases. Ann. Surg. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002367 (2017).

  5. Pollock, C. B. et al. Oncogenic K-RAS is required to maintain changes in cytoskeletal organization, adhesion, and motility in colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 65, 1244–1250 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brudvik, K. W. et al. Meta-analysis of KRAS mutations and survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Br. J. Surg. 102, 1175–1183 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vauthey, J. N. et al. RAS mutation status predicts survival and patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann. Surg. 258, 619–626 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brudvik, K. W. et al. RAS mutation predicts positive resection margins and narrower resection margins in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 23, 2635–2643 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Odisio, B. C. et al. Local tumour progression after percutaneous ablation of colorectal liver metastases according to RAS mutation status. Br. J. Surg. 104, 760–768 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Abdalla, E. K. et al. Recurrence and outcomes following hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation, and combined resection/ablation for colorectal liver metastases. Ann. Surg. 239, 818–825 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ruth Haynes for help in preparing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Nicolas Vauthey.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brudvik, K., Vauthey, JN. KRAS mutations and hepatic recurrence after treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 14, 638–639 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2017.129

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2017.129

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer