Abstract
Recent changes to the legal and ethical criteria that govern the inclusion of children and incompetent adults in genetic research are likely to lead to advances in research, but might leave the rights of the participants in this research in need of additional safeguards. Here, we discuss why this might be and propose policy considerations that could help to protect the rights of these particularly vulnerable groups of research participants.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Sharing longitudinal, non-biological birth cohort data: a cross-sectional analysis of parent consent preferences
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making Open Access 12 November 2018
-
Personalized assent for pediatric biobanks
BMC Medical Ethics Open Access 12 October 2016
-
Handling ethical, legal and social issues in birth cohort studies involving genetic research: responses from studies in six countries
BMC Medical Ethics Open Access 23 March 2010
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$189.00 per year
only $15.75 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
The Code of Nuremberg Permissible Medical Experiments Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10; Nuremberg, October 1946–1949, Vol. 2, 181–182 (US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, USA, 1949).
World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki (Helsinki, 1964).
Council of Europe Steering Committee on Bioethics (CDBI). Draft Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine on Biomedical Research (Europe, 2001).
Council of Europe. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (Strasbourg, 1997).
World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki — Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects (Edinburgh, 2000).
UNESCO. Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights, article 5(e) (Paris, 1997).
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. Draft Revision of CIOMS International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects (1993), (Tokyo and Inuyama, 2001).
European Society of Human Genetics. Population Genetic Screening Programmes: Recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics (Europe, 2000).
World Health Organization. Proposed International Guidelines on Ethical Issues in Medical Genetics and Genetics Services (Geneva, 1997).
US Government Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Vol. 1, Sect. 46.408(a) (Washington DC, 1997).
Medical Research Council of Canada et al. Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans (Canada, 1999).
American Society of Human Genetics. Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 57, 1233 (1995).
Parliament of Finland. Medical Research Act (Finland, 1999).
National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance, Vol. 1 (United States, 1999).
Canadian Medical Association. Code of Ethics of the Canadian Medical Association (Canada, 1996).
Medical Research Council. The Ethical Conduct of Research on Children (Canada, 1993).
Medical Research Council. Human Tissue and Biological Samples for Use in Research (London, 1999).
The New York State Task Force on Life and the Law. Integrating Genetic Services into Clinical Care: Genetic Testing and Screening in the Age of Genomic Medicine Ch. 8, 219–239 (New York, 2000).
American Medical Association. Genetic Testing of Children E-2.138 (Chicago, Illinois, 1996).
National Health Medical Research Council. Guidelines for Genetic Registers and Associated Genetic Material, Sect. 4.2.2 (Australia, 1999).
Civil Code of Quebec, Article 21.
Austria Federal Law of 1994 (BGB1. No.510/1994) s65(4).2.
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. Declaration of Inuyama: Human Genome Mapping: Genetic Screening and Gene Therapy, Pt VII (Geneva, 1990).
Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences. Medical–Ethical Guidelines for Genetic Investigations in Humans (Switzerland, 1993).
The Nuffield Trust. Mental Disorders and Genetics rec.8.50 (United Kingdom, 1998).
National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Research Involving Persons with Mental Disorders That May Affect Decision-making Capacity Vol.1 (Washington DC, 1998).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank M. Howlett for her assistance, and the Genetics and Society Project for its support during the preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Related links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Knoppers, B., Avard, D., Cardinal, G. et al. Children and incompetent adults in genetic research: consent and safeguards. Nat Rev Genet 3, 221–225 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg750
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg750
This article is cited by
-
Sharing longitudinal, non-biological birth cohort data: a cross-sectional analysis of parent consent preferences
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (2018)
-
Personalized assent for pediatric biobanks
BMC Medical Ethics (2016)
-
Regulating biobanking with children’s tissue: a legal analysis and the experts’ view
European Journal of Human Genetics (2016)
-
Clarifying assent in pediatric research
European Journal of Human Genetics (2014)
-
Children and biobanks: a review of the ethical and legal discussion
Human Genetics (2011)