Comment in 2016

Filter By:

Article Type
Year
  • Despite the vast amount of research on schizophrenia and depression in the past two decades, there have been few innovative drugs to treat these disorders. Precompetitive research collaborations between companies and academic groups can help tackle this innovation deficit, as illustrated by the achievements of the IMI-NEWMEDS consortium.

    • Francesc Artigas
    • Esther Schenker
    • Adam J. Schwarz
    Comment
  • The growth of precision medicine presents challenges for the regulators of medicines, related to aspects that include the basis of evidence generation, patient involvement in the regulatory process, cost of new medicines and the need for new regulatory models. It also raises questions about the tolerance of risk, especially with early interventions for life-threatening diseases.

    • Alasdair Breckenridge
    • Hans-Georg Eichler
    • Jonathan P. Jarow
    Comment
  • There is a growing consensus that drug discovery thrives in an open environment. Here, we describe how the malaria community has embraced four levels of open data — open science, open innovation, open access and open source — to catalyse the development of new medicines, and consider principles that could enable open data approaches to be applied to other disease areas.

    • Timothy N. C. Wells
    • Paul Willis
    • Rob Hooft van Huijsduijnen
    Comment
  • A global response to the chronic shortfall in antibiotic innovation is urgently needed to combat antimicrobial resistance. Here, we introduce CARB-X, a new global public–private partnership that will invest more than US$350 million in the next 5 years to accelerate the progression of a diverse portfolio of innovative antibacterial products into clinical trials.

    • Kevin Outterson
    • John H. Rex
    • Joseph Larsen
    Comment
  • Rare disease drug development could benefit substantially from increased patient engagement and input to enhance understanding of the key aspects of disease impact, ways to measure these impacts and patients' perspectives on the benefit–risk profile of potential therapies.

    • Max G. Bronstein
    • Emil D. Kakkis
    Comment
  • Drug candidates may fail in clinical trials for many reasons. Biomarker-guided clinical trial design can mitigate the risk of failure and enable more informative clinical experiments regardless of outcomes.

    • Michael J. Townsend
    • Joseph R. Arron
    Comment
  • While the pharmaceutical industry overall has faced huge challenges in drug R&D in recent years, some major companies have consistently been much more productive than average. Here, we highlight 'organizational effectiveness' as a key factor underlying this superior performance and explain how it can be enhanced.

    • Peter Tollman
    • Valery Panier
    • Francis Cuss
    Comment
  • Integrating a wide range of biomedical data such as that rapidly emerging from the use of next-generation sequencing is expected to have a key role in identifying and qualifying new biomarkers to support precision medicine. Here, we highlight some of the challenges for biomedical data integration and approaches to address them.

    • Antigoni Elefsinioti
    • Tanja Bellaire
    • Joachim Reischl
    Comment
  • Japanese clinical research and regulatory frameworks have evolved considerably in the past two decades to reduce the delay in the introduction of new drugs in Japan compared with other major markets. However, recently introduced changes related to access to unapproved drugs might have the opposite effect and might not benefit all patients.

    • Yasuhiro Fujiwara
    Comment
  • Global collaboration in translational science promises to accelerate the discovery, development and dissemination of new medical interventions. Here, we introduce a new international collaboration of translational science organizations and highlight our initial strategy to reduce or remove bottlenecks in translation.

    • C. Taylor Gilliland
    • Dorit Zuk
    • Anton E. Ussi
    Comment