Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Anticoagulation during pregnancy in patients with a prosthetic heart valve

Abstract

Effective anticoagulation is mandatory for pregnant women with mechanical heart valves. Oral anticoagulants offer the best maternal protection against thrombosis, but their use might be associated with an appreciable risk of fetal malformations and pregnancy loss. By contrast, heparin derivatives are associated with a reduced risk of fetal damage, but an increased risk of valve thrombosis in the mother, even with appropriate dose adjustment and monitoring of therapeutic efficacy. Given the varying risks of available anticoagulation strategies, and the paucity of data to inform the optimal approach, no single accepted treatment option exists for pregnant women with mechanical prosthetic valves. Although low-molecular-weight heparin is considered more efficacious than unfractionated heparin, treatment failures, even at therapeutic levels of factor Xa inhibition, have been reported. The risk of warfarin-related embryopathy might be overstated, particularly at doses ≤5 mg daily. We advocate an individualized anticoagulation strategy that takes into account the patient's preferences, calls for the use of vitamin K antagonists throughout pregnancy (substituted with a heparin derivative only close to term) for those patients at the greatest risk of thromboembolism, and relies on close multidisciplinary collaboration between the cardiac and obstetric care teams.

Key Points

  • The management of pregnant women with prosthetic heart valves is a clinical challenge

  • No clear consensus exists on the optimal artificial valve and anticoagulation strategy for these women, owing to the paucity of data that can guide therapeutic decisions

  • Cardiac and obstetric care teams need to work collaboratively to help these patients make personalized decisions that consider the risks and benefits of various therapies

  • Consistent monitoring to maintain effective anticoagulation is crucial, regardless of the chosen treatment strategy

  • Warfarin throughout pregnancy might be appropriate for selected patients, particularly those at increased risk of thromboembolism and when the risk of adverse fetal outcomes is comparatively low

  • Heparin derivatives pose no direct risk to the fetus, but are limited by an appreciable risk of maternal thromboembolic complications, even in patients with seemingly therapeutic levels of anticoagulation

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Proposed algorithm for anticoagulation therapy during pregnancy in women with prosthetic heart valves.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Di Saia, P. J. Pregnancy and delivery of a patient with a Starr-Edwards mitral valve prosthesis: report of a case. Obstet. Gynecol. 28, 469–472 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nassar, A. H. et al. Pregnancy outcome in women with prosthetic heart valves. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 191, 1009–1013 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Drenthen, W. et al. Predictors of pregnancy complications in women with congenital heart disease. Eur. Heart J. 31, 2124–2132 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. [No authors listed] Cardiovascular disease and use of oral and injectable progestogen-only contraceptives and combined injectable contraceptives. Results of an international, multicenter, case-control study. World Health Organization Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease and Steroid Hormone Contraception. Contraception 57, 315–324 (1998).

  5. Hung, L. & Rahimtoola, S. H. Prosthetic heart valves and pregnancy. Circulation 107, 1240–1246 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonow, R. O. et al. 2008 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease). Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 52, e1–e142 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Deruelle, P. & Coulon, C. The use of low-molecular-weight heparins in pregnancy—how safe are they? Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 19, 573–577 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Boer, K., ten Cate, J. W., Sturk, A., Borm, J. J. & Treffers, P. E. Enhanced thrombin generation in normal and hypertensive pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 160, 95–100 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson, G. D. Pregnancy-induced changes in pharmacokinetics: a mechanistic-based approach. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 44, 989–1008 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rahimtoola, S. H. Choice of prosthetic heart valve in adults: an update. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 55, 2413–2426 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yun, K. L. et al. Durability of the Hancock MO bioprosthesis compared with standard aortic valve bioprostheses. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 60 (Suppl. 2), S221–S228 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jamieson, W. R. et al. Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: primary tissue failure (structural valve deterioration) by age groups. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 46, 155–162 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. North, R. A. et al. Long-term survival and valve-related complications in young women with cardiac valve replacements. Circulation 99, 2669–2676 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Elkayam, U. & Bitar, F. Valvular heart disease and pregnancy: part II: prosthetic valves. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 46, 403–410 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jamieson, W. R. et al. Pregnancy and bioprostheses: influence on structural valve deterioration. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 60 (Suppl. 2), S282–S286 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Badduke, B. R. et al. Pregnancy and childbearing in a population with biologic valvular prostheses. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 102, 179–186 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Avila, W. S., Rossi, E. G., Grinberg, M. & Ramires, J. A. Influence of pregnancy after bioprosthetic valve replacement in young women: a prospective five-year study. J. Heart Valve Dis. 11, 864–869 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. O'Brien, M. F. et al. The homograft aortic valve: a 29-year, 99.3% follow up of 1,022 valve replacements. J. Heart Valve Dis. 10, 334–344 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Denbow, C. E., Matadial, L., Sivapragasam, S. & Spencer, H. Pregnancy in patients after homograft cardiac valve replacement. Chest 83, 540–542 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sadler, L. et al. Pregnancy outcomes and cardiac complications in women with mechanical, bioprosthetic and homograft valves. BJOG 107, 245–253 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gopal, K. et al. Homograft aortic root replacement during pregnancy. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 74, 243–245 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ross, D. N. Replacement of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft. Lancet 2, 956–958 (1967).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lentini, S. Ross principle and concept of a living valve. Lancet 376, 490–491 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Martin, T. C., Idahosa, V., Ogunbiyi, A., Fevrier-Roberts, G. & Winter, A. Successful pregnancy and delivery after pulmonary autograft operation (Ross procedure) for rheumatic aortic valve insufficiency. West Indian Med. J. 52, 62–64 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dore, A. & Somerville, J. Pregnancy in patients with pulmonary autograft valve replacement. Eur. Heart J. 18, 1659–1662 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yap, S. C. et al. Outcome of pregnancy in women after pulmonary autograft valve replacement for congenital aortic valve disease. J. Heart Valve Dis. 16, 398–403 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. El-Hamamsy, I. et al. Long-term outcomes after autograft versus homograft aortic root replacement in adults with aortic valve disease: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 376, 524–531 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Klieverik, L. M. et al. The Ross operation: a trojan horse? Eur. Heart J. 28, 1993–2000 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Takkenberg, J. J. et al. Report of the Dutch experience with the Ross procedure in 343 patients. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 22, 70–77 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schmidtke, C., Stierle, U. & Sievers, H. H. Valve-sparing aortic root remodeling for pulmonary autograft aneurysm. J. Heart Valve Dis. 11, 504–505 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. McLintock, C. Anticoagulant therapy in pregnant women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves: no easy option. Thromb. Res. 127 (Suppl. 3), S56–S60 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ufer, M. Comparative pharmacokinetics of vitamin K antagonists: warfarin, phenprocoumon and acenocoumarol. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 44, 1227–1246 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hirsh, J. et al. Oral anticoagulants: mechanism of action, clinical effectiveness, and optimal therapeutic range. Chest 119 (Suppl. 1), 8S–21S (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chan, W. S., Anand, S. & Ginsberg, J. S. Anticoagulation of pregnant women with mechanical heart valves: a systematic review of the literature. Arch. Intern. Med. 160, 191–196 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Arnaout, M. S. et al. Is there a safe anticoagulation protocol for pregnant women with prosthetic valves? Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 25, 101–104 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Vitale, N. et al. Dose-dependent fetal complications of warfarin in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 33, 1637–1641 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Meschengieser, S. S., Fondevila, C. G., Santarelli, M. T. & Lazzari, M. A. Anticoagulation in pregnant women with mechanical heart valve prostheses. Heart 82, 23–26 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee, J. H. et al. Low molecular weight heparin treatment in pregnant women with a mechanical heart valve prosthesis. J. Korean Med. Sci. 22, 258–261 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Howie, P. W. Anticoagulants in pregnancy. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 13, 349–363 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rutherford, S. E. & Phelan, J. P. Thromboembolic disease in pregnancy. Clin. Perinatol. 13, 719–739 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Villasanta, U. Therapy in antepartum thrombophlebitis. Obstet. Gynecol. 26, 534–541 (1965).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hall, J. G., Pauli, R. M. & Wilson, K. M. Maternal and fetal sequelae of anticoagulation during pregnancy. Am. J. Med. 68, 122–140 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Stevenson, R. E., Burton, O. M., Ferlauto, G. J. & Taylor, H. A. Hazards of oral anticoagulants during pregnancy. JAMA 243, 1549–1551 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chong, M. K., Harvey, D. & de Swiet, M. Follow-up study of children whose mothers were treated with warfarin during pregnancy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 91, 1070–1073 (1984).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Whitfield, M. F. Chondrodysplasia punctata after warfarin in early pregnancy. Case report and summary of the literature. Arch. Dis. Child. 55, 139–142 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Pauli, R. M., Lian, J. B., Mosher, D. F. & Suttie, J. W. Association of congenital deficiency of multiple vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors and the phenotype of the warfarin embryopathy: clues to the mechanism of teratogenicity of coumarin derivatives. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 41, 566–583 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Menon, R. K., Gill, D. S., Thomas, M., Kernoff, P. B. & Dandona, P. Impaired carboxylation of osteocalcin in warfarin-treated patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 64, 59–61 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Salazar, E., Izaguirre, R., Verdejo, J. & Mutchinick, O. Failure of adjusted doses of subcutaneous heparin to prevent thromboembolic phenomena in pregnant patients with mechanical cardiac valve prostheses. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 27, 1698–1703 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sbarouni, E. & Oakley, C. M. Outcome of pregnancy in women with valve prostheses. Br. Heart J. 71, 196–201 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Ginsberg, J. S., Hirsh, J., Turner, D. C., Levine, M. N. & Burrows, R. Risks to the fetus of anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy. Thromb. Haemost. 61, 197–203 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ginsberg, J. S. & Hirsh, J. Anticoagulants during pregnancy. Ann. Rev. Med. 40, 79–86 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Iturbe-Alessio, I. et al. Risks of anticoagulant therapy in pregnant women with artificial heart valves. N. Engl. J. Med. 315, 1390–1393 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wong, V., Cheng, C. H. & Chan, K. C. Fetal and neonatal outcome of exposure to anticoagulants during pregnancy. Am. J. Med. Genet. 45, 17–21 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Sillesen, M., Hjortdal, V., Vejlstrup, N. & Sørensen, K. Pregnancy with prosthetic heart valves—30 years' nationwide experience in Denmark. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 40, 448–454 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Barbour, L. A. Current concepts of anticoagulant therapy in pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. North Am. 24, 499–521 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. European Society of Gynecology et al. ESC guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: The Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur. Heart J. 32, 3147–3197 (2011).

  57. Schaefer, C. et al. Vitamin K antagonists and pregnancy outcome. A multi-centre prospective study. Thromb. Haemost. 95, 949–957 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Cotrufo, M. et al. Risk of warfarin during pregnancy with mechanical valve prostheses. Obstet. Gynecol. 99, 35–40 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Soma-Pillay, P., Nene, Z., Mathivha, T. M. & Macdonald, A. P. The effect of warfarin dosage on maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with prosthetic heart valves. Obstetric Medicine 4, 24–27 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. McLintock, C., McCowan, L. M. & North, R. A. Maternal complications and pregnancy outcome in women with mechanical prosthetic heart valves treated with enoxaparin. BJOG 116, 1585–1592 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Mehndiratta, S., Suneja, A., Gupta, B. & Bhatt, S. Fetotoxicity of warfarin anticoagulation. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 282, 335–337 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Hirsh, J., Dalen, J., Guyatt, G. & American College of Chest Physicians. The sixth (2000) ACCP guidelines for antithrombotic therapy for prevention and treatment of thrombosis. American College of Chest Physicians. Chest 119 (Suppl. 1), 1S–2S (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Quinn, J. et al. Use of high intensity adjusted dose low molecular weight heparin in women with mechanical heart valves during pregnancy: a single-center experience. Haematologica 94, 1608–1612 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Greer, I. A. & Nelson-Piercy, C. Low-molecular-weight heparins for thromboprophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: a systematic review of safety and efficacy. Blood 106, 401–407 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Barbour, L. A., Oja, J. L. & Schultz, L. K. A prospective trial that demonstrates that dalteparin requirements increase in pregnancy to maintain therapeutic levels of anticoagulation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 191, 1024–1029 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Sarig, G. & Brenner, B. Monitoring of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in pregnancy. Thromb. Res. 115 (Suppl. 1), 84–86 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Guyatt, G. H. et al. Executive summary: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 141 (Suppl. 2), 7S–47S (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Abildgaard, U. et al. Management of pregnant women with mechanical heart valve prosthesis: thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin. Thromb. Res. 124, 262–267 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Oran, B., Lee-Parritz, A. & Ansell, J. Low molecular weight heparin for the prophylaxis of thromboembolism in women with prosthetic mechanical heart valves during pregnancy. Thromb. Haemost. 92, 747–751 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Yinon, Y. et al. Use of low molecular weight heparin in pregnant women with mechanical heart valves. Am. J. Cardiol. 104, 1259–1263 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Friedrich, E. & Hameed, A. B. Fluctuations in anti-factor Xa levels with therapeutic enoxaparin anticoagulation in pregnancy. J. Perinatol. 30, 253–257 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Bates, S. M. et al. Venous thromboembolism, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (8th edition). Chest 133 (Suppl. 6), 844S–886S (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Knol, H. M., Schultinge, L., Erwich, J. J. & Meijer, K. Fondaparinux as an alternative anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy. J. Thromb. Haemost. 8, 1876–1879 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Chapman, M. L., Martinez-Borges, A. R. & Mertz, H. L. Lepirudin for treatment of acute thrombosis during pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 112, 432–433 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Magnani, H. N. An analysis of clinical outcomes of 91 pregnancies in 83 women treated with danaparoid (Orgaran). Thromb. Res. 125, 297–302 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. de Valk, H. W. et al. Comparing subcutaneous danaparoid with intravenous unfractionated heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. A randomized controlled trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 123, 1–9 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Krauel, K. et al. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia—therapeutic concentrations of danaparoid, unlike fondaparinux and direct thrombin inhibitors, inhibit formation of platelet factor 4-heparin complexes. J. Thromb. Haemost. 6, 2160–2167 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Ofosu, F. A. Anticoagulant mechanisms of Orgaran (Org 10172) and its fraction with high affinity to antithrombin III (Org 10849). Haemostasis 22, 66–72 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Dendrinos, S., Sakkas, E. & Makrakis, E. Low-molecular-weight heparin versus intravenous immunoglobulin for recurrent abortion associated with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 104, 223–225 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Heilmann, L. et al. Pregnancy outcome in women with antiphospholipid antibodies: report on a retrospective study. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 34, 794–802 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Goldenberg, R. L., Culhane, J. F., Iams, J. D. & Romero, R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 371, 75–84 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Bauer, K. A., Eriksson, B. I., Lassen, M. R., Turpie, A. G. & Steering Committee of the Pentasaccharide in Major Knee Surgery Study. Fondaparinux compared with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective major knee surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 345, 1305–1310 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Wijesiriwardana, A., Lees, D. A. & Lush, C. Fondaparinux as anticoagulant in a pregnant woman with heparin allergy. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 17, 147–149 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Gerhardt, A., Zotz, R. B., Stockschlaeder, M. & Scharf, R. E. Fondaparinux is an effective alternative anticoagulant in pregnant women with high risk of venous thromboembolism and intolerance to low-molecular-weight heparins and heparinoids. Thromb. Haemost. 97, 496–497 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Di Nisio, M., Middeldorp, S. & Buller, H. R. Direct thrombin inhibitors. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 1028–1040 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Haas, S. New oral Xa and IIa inhibitors: updates on clinical trial results. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 25, 52–60 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Tran, A. & Cheng-Lai, A. Dabigatran etexilate: the first oral anticoagulant available in the United States since warfarin. Cardiol. Rev. 19, 154–161 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Horlocker, T. T. et al. Regional anesthesia in the patient receiving antithrombotic or thrombolytic therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine evidence-based guidelines (3rd edition). Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 35, 64–101 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Leon, M. B. et al. Transcatheter aortic–valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 1597–1607 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Kawamata, K. et al. Risks and pregnancy outcome in women with prosthetic mechanical heart valve replacement. Circ. J. 71, 211–213 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Izaguirre, R. et al. Anti-Xa activity with low-molecular-weight heparin, enoxaparin, during pregnancy in women with mechanical heart valves. Proc. West. Pharmacol. Soc. 45, 127–128 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J. M. Castellano, R. Narayan, and P. Vaishnava researched the data for the article. All the authors provided substantial contributions to discussions of its content, wrote the article, and reviewed and/or edited the manuscript before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jose M. Castellano.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castellano, J., Narayan, R., Vaishnava, P. et al. Anticoagulation during pregnancy in patients with a prosthetic heart valve. Nat Rev Cardiol 9, 415–424 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2012.69

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2012.69

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing