Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Volume 10 Issue 4, April 2010

From The Editors

Top of page ⤴

Comment

  • The seminal article by Douglas Hanahan and Robert Weinberg on the hallmarks of cancer is 10 years old this year and its contribution to how we see cancer has been substantial. But, in embracing this view, have we lost sight of what makes cancer cancer?

    • Yuri Lazebnik
    Comment
Top of page ⤴

Research Highlight

  • A new method allows the identification of rare mutations in mitochondrial DNA that differ between normal and cancer cells.

    • Nicola McCarthy
    Research Highlight
  • Another member of the hippo–salvador–warts pathway has been identified.

    • Nicola McCarthy
    Research Highlight
  • Fluorescent probes that specifically label tumours improve the surgical removal of tumours.

    • Meera Swami
    Research Highlight
  • Recent results indicate that stringent profiling of tumours will be needed prior to the use of RAF inhibitors.

    • Nicola McCarthy
    Research Highlight
Top of page ⤴

In Brief

Top of page ⤴

Research Highlight

  • Long-range epigenetic silencing decreases transcriptional plasticity in prostate cancer.

    • Meera Swami
    Research Highlight
  • DOK2 is frequently deleted in human lung cancer and suppresses lung cancer cell growth.

    • Mhairi Skinner
    Research Highlight
  • Glioblastoma radiotherapy might be improved by inhibitors of vasculogenesis rather than angiogenesis.

    • Sarah Seton-Rogers
    Research Highlight
Top of page ⤴

Review Article

  • Tumour-derived cell lines are an important model for the discovery and development of new anticancer drugs. The recent development of large panels of cell lines and high-throughput technologies has revitalized this field, and this Review discusses how these tools can be used to screen anticancer agents.

    • Sreenath V. Sharma
    • Daniel A. Haber
    • Jeff Settleman
    Review Article
  • Effects on both global protein synthesis and selective translation of specific mRNAs can contribute to cancer development and progression. How are components of the translation machinery altered in cancer, and can these be targeted therapeutically?

    • Deborah Silvera
    • Silvia C. Formenti
    • Robert J. Schneider
    Review Article
  • This Review discusses the progress made with developing drugs that specifically target the altered metabolic pathways of tumours and suggests additional targets that might also be beneficial.

    • Daniel A. Tennant
    • Raúl V. Durán
    • Eyal Gottlieb
    Review Article
  • Many proteases are regulated by phosphorylation, and many kinases are regulated by proteolytic cleavage. This Review examines kinase–protease interactions and their functional effects in cancer in depth, revealing the enormous diversity and complexity of this crosstalk.

    • Carlos López-Otín
    • Tony Hunter
    Review Article
Top of page ⤴

Opinion

  • Recent findings have thrust poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) into the limelight as potential chemotherapeutic targets. What is known about the structures and functions of the family of PARP enzymes and which questions do we need answered to guide the rational development of PARP inhibitors as anticancer agents?

    • Michèle Rouleau
    • Anand Patel
    • Guy G. Poirier
    Opinion
  • Recently, MYC has been shown to serve as a direct regulator of ribosome biogenesis and therefore coordinates protein synthesis. Could the regulation of ribosome biogenesis by MYC be necessary for its role in tumorigenesis?

    • Jan van Riggelen
    • Alper Yetil
    • Dean W. Felsher
    Opinion
Top of page ⤴

Erratum

Top of page ⤴

Corrigendum

Top of page ⤴

Search

Quick links