Calls for more data on the impact of nanomaterials on human health and the environment reflect a failure to accept that there will always be unknowns associated with any new technology. Effective governance of emerging nanotechnologies will require an acknowledgement of these unknowns, an open and adaptive approach to regulation, and the courage to make decisions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Knowledge as a key determinant of public support for autonomous vehicles
Scientific Reports Open Access 25 January 2024
-
Stories vs. facts: triggering emotion and action-taking on climate change
Climatic Change Open Access 06 April 2019
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Kearnes, M., Macnaghten, P. & Wilsdon, J. Governing at the Nanoscale (Demos, 2006); available at <http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/governingatthenanoscale>.
Jones, R. Nature 10.1038/news.2008.1290 (2008).
Scheufele, D. et al. Nature Nanotech. 4, 91–94 (2009).
Guston, D. Nature 454, 940 (2008).
Jasanoff, S. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States (Princeton Univ. Press, 2007).
Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties (Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering, 2004); available at <http://www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm>.
SCENIHR The Appropriateness of Existing Methodologies to Assess the Potential Risks Associated with Engineered and Adventitious Products Nanotechnologies (European Commission, 2006); available at <http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_003b.pdf>.
Barlow, S. et al. EFSA Journal 958, 1–39 (2009).
Novel Materials in the Environment: The Case of Nanotechnology (RCEP, 2008); available at <http://www.rcep.org.uk>.
Nature Nanotech. 3, 697 (2008).
Nanotechnology Task Force Report 2007 (FDA, 2007); available at <http://www.fda.gov/nanotechnology/>.
Maynard, A. et al. Nature 444, 267–269 (2006).
Council for Science and Technology Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies: A Review of Government's Progress on its Policy Commitments (CST, 2007); available at <http://www2.cst.gov.uk/cst/business/files/nano_review.pdf>.
Hecht, A. Small Matter, Many Unknowns (Swiss Re, 2004).
Balbus, J. et al. Environ. Health Perspect. 115, 1654–1659 (2007).
Environmental Defense – Du Pont Nano Partnership Nano Risk Framework (Environmental Defense Fund & Du Pont, 2007); available at <http://www.nanoriskframework.com>.
DuPont Nanomaterial Risk Assessment Worksheet (Environmental Defense Fund, 2007); available at <http://www.edf.org/documents/6553_CNTs_Summary.pdf>.
Renn, O. & Roco, M. J. Nanopart. Res. 8, 153–191 (2006).
Roco, M. J. Nanopart. Res. 6, 1–10 (2004).
Marchant, G., Sylvester, D. & Abbott, K. Nanoethics 2, 43–60 (2008).
Stirling, A. Sci. Technol. Hum. Val. 33, 262–294 (2008).
Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program: Interim Report (EPA, 2009); available at <http://www.epa.gov/oppt/nano/nmsp-interim-report-final.pdf>.
International Risk Governance Council Nanotechnology Risk Governance (IRGC, 2008); available at <http://www.irgc.org/IMG/pdf/PB_nanoFINAL2_2_.pdf>.
Ludlow, K., Bowman, D. & Hodge, G. A Review of Possible Impacts of Nanotechnology on Australia's Regulatory Framework (Monash Univ., 2008); available at <http://www.innovation.gov.au/Industry/Nanotechnology/Documents/MonashReport2008.pdf>.
http://www.hourei.mhlw.go.jp/hourei/doc/tsuchi/200207-a00.pdf (in Japanese).
Approaches to Safe Nanotechnology (NIOSH, 2009); available at <http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/nanotech/safenano/>.
http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/TechnologyDevelopment/Nanotechnology/index.cfm
Available via <http://tinuyrl.com/l2lb97>.
Available via <http://tinyurl.com/lvlopd>.
http://www.foe.org/europe-leading-way-nanotechnology-regulation
Acknowledgements
The author acknowledges stimulating conversations with J. Pennington (Bioethics Council of New Zealand), S. Davenport (Victoria Univ. Wellington), J. Cupples (Univ. Canterbury), G. Fitzgerald (Fitzgerald Applied Sociology) and J. Gough (Environmental Risk Management Authority).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, S. The New Deficit Model. Nature Nanotech 4, 609–611 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2009.278
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2009.278
This article is cited by
-
Knowledge as a key determinant of public support for autonomous vehicles
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
From Nano Backlash to Public Indifference: Some Reflections on French Public Dialogues on Nanotechnology
NanoEthics (2021)
-
Stories vs. facts: triggering emotion and action-taking on climate change
Climatic Change (2019)
-
Regulation of engineered nanomaterials: current challenges, insights and future directions
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2018)
-
Anticipatory Ethics and Governance (AEG): Towards a Future Care Orientation Around Nanotechnology
NanoEthics (2015)