Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Still alluring and hard to predict at 100

A Correction to this article was published on 19 April 2011

This article has been updated

Superconductivity has gone from a rare event to a ground state that pops up in materials once considered improbable, if not impossible. Although we cannot predict its occurrence yet, recent discoveries give us some clues about how to look for new — hopefully more useful — superconducting materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The surprising nature of superconductivity.
Figure 2: Similar phase diagrams.

Change history

  • 19 April 2011

    In the version of this Commentary originally published, in the second paragraph, 'Cooper' was spelt incorrectly in the first two instances; this has now been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions.

References

  1. Shachtman, T. Absolute Zero and the Conquest of Cold (Mariner Books, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Spanish_Inquisition_(Monty_Python)

  3. Monty Python's Flying Circus Series 2 Episode 2 (BBC TV, 22 September 1970).

  4. Matthias, B. T., Geballe, T. H., Geller, S. & Corenzwit, E. Phys. Rev. 95, 1435–1435 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gurevich, A. G. Nature Mater. 10, 255–259 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Godeke, A. et al. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 093909 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Altarawneh, M. M. et al. Phys. Rev. B 78, 220505 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Canfield, P. C., Gammel, P. L. & Bishop, D. J. Phys. Today 51, 40–46 (October 1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Canfield, P. C. & Crabtree, G. W. Phys. Today 56, 34–40 (March 2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Canfield, P. C. & Bud'ko, S. L. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 27–50 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Varma, C. Nature 468, 184–185 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagamatsu, J., Nakagawa, N., Muranaka, T., Zenitani, Y. & Akimitsu, J. Nature 410, 63–69 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamihara, Y., Watanabe, T., Hirano, M. & Hosono, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 3296–3297 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author's research into superconductivity is supported by the Office of Basic Energy Science, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering under contract number DE-AC02-07CH11358 and by AFOSR-MURI grant #FA9550-09-1-0603.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul C. Canfield.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Canfield, P. Still alluring and hard to predict at 100. Nature Mater 10, 259–261 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2990

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2990

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing