Nature | News

US Senate reaffirms existence of climate change

But lawmakers reject human role in phenomenon during debate over legislation to authorize Keystone XL oil pipeline.

Article tools

Rights & Permissions

The US Senate resoundingly reaffirmed the existence of global warming during a contentious debate on 21 January over legislation that would authorize construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline. But lawmakers narrowly rejected the idea that human activities have played a part in climate change.

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (Democrat, Rhode Island) offered an amendment that stated that climate change is “not a hoax”. The lawmaker criticized his Republican colleagues for either denying or neglecting to address the issue while pushing for an oil pipeline that would increase greenhouse-gas emissions. Keystone XL would carry oil from the tar sands of Alberta, Canada, to the US Midwest, connecting to existing pipelines that run to the Gulf of Mexico.

“Let’s find out if there are people on the Republican side of the aisle who are willing to say climate change is real,” said Whitehouse.

At least on this particular vote, the answer was unequivocal: lawmakers voted 98–1 to adopt a 16-word, non-binding amendment that seemed to poke fun at the Senate’s leading climate sceptic, Republican James Inhofe of Oklahoma. The provision reads: “It is the sense of the Senate that climate change is real and not a hoax.” Even Inhofe, who once called global warming “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people", joined Whitehouse as a last-minute sponsor of the amendment.

Senators narrowly rejected an amendment from Senator Brian Schatz (Democrat, Hawaii) that went a step further, pinning some of the blame for climate change on human activities. That provision failed 50–49.

The votes mark the first time since 2005 that the US Senate has expressed a formal position on the existence of global warming. At that time, Inhofe proposed an amendment that would have killed a similar resolution affirming the existence of global warming; the lawmakers rejected Inhofe's amendment on a 53–44 vote, and then adopted the resolution itself by voice vote.

Journal name:
Nature
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature.2015.16773

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments

Commenting is currently unavailable.

sign up to Nature briefing

What matters in science — and why — free in your inbox every weekday.

Sign up

Listen

new-pod-red

Nature Podcast

Our award-winning show features highlights from the week's edition of Nature, interviews with the people behind the science, and in-depth commentary and analysis from journalists around the world.