Nature | News

Trump says Francis Collins will stay on at the NIH

Geneticist has led the biomedical research agency since 2009.

Article tools

Rights & Permissions

Chris Maddaloni/Nature

Francis Collins in his office at the National Institutes of Health.

US President Donald Trump has chosen Francis Collins to lead the National Institutes of Health (NIH) on a permanent basis, the White House announced on 6 June. Collins, who has led the agency since August 2009, is a holdover from the administration of president Barack Obama — and is now the first NIH director since the 1970s to be chosen by two presidents.

In January, Trump asked Collins to stay at the NIH temporarily while the White House evaluated candidates to lead the agency. Rumoured contenders included Representative Andy Harris (Republican, Maryland), an anaesthesiologist; retired Army neurosurgeon Geoffrey Ling, the former director of biotechnology at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; and billionaire surgeon Patrick Soon-Shiong, who runs a network of health companies called NantWorks.

Before taking over the top job at the NIH, Collins was perhaps best known for his leadership of the Human Genome Project, which in 2000 published the first ‘rough draft’ of the genome. As NIH director, Collins has launched several large research projects, including the Brain Research Through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) initiative to map the human brain; the Precision Medicine Initiative, which includes an ambitious study of health records and genomic information from one million people in the United States; and the Cancer Moonshot, a US$1-billion proposal to double the pace of cancer research in five years.

Trump has put forth several proposals to reshape how the biomedical-research agency functions — including a plan to cut the NIH budget by 18% in 2018, to US$26 billion. Much of the savings would come from changing the system that the NIH uses to reimburse grantees’ institutions for expenses such as administration and facilities maintenance, which are collectively known as “indirect costs”. It is not clear whether Congress will go along with this plan; in early May, lawmakers approved a 2017 budget that increased the NIH’s funding by $2 billion over the 2016 level, to about $34 billion.

Journal name:
Nature
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature.2017.22117

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments for this thread are now closed.

Comments

Comments Subscribe to comments

There are currently no comments.

sign up to Nature briefing

What matters in science — and why — free in your inbox every weekday.

Sign up

Listen

new-pod-red

Nature Podcast

Our award-winning show features highlights from the week's edition of Nature, interviews with the people behind the science, and in-depth commentary and analysis from journalists around the world.