Nature | Trend Watch

Snail's pace: Nature readers on their longest wait to get published

Online poll suggests 10% have had a paper held for at least 3 years.

Article tools

Rights & Permissions

TREND WATCH: A poll answered by more than 3,600 Nature readers suggests that some 10% have waited at least 3 years for one or more of their papers to be published in a journal. But more than one-third have never waited longer than a year. The online poll accompanied a feature article on scientists' frustrations with the time it takes to publish papers.

Nature also asked readers what they thought was the best way to speed up publication of scientific papers. Of nearly 3,000 responses, more than 40% suggested that peer reviewers should stop asking for unnecessary revisions in manuscripts, and another 22% asked journal editors to make quicker and clearer decisions.

Only 15% suggested that authors should publish preprints and make their work available online before formal peer review. A meeting about how to encourage biologists to do just that, ASAPbio, is being held this week at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute in Chevy Chase, Maryland.

Journal name:
Nature
DOI:
doi:10.1038/nature.2016.19375

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments for this thread are now closed.

Comments

Comments Subscribe to comments

There are currently no comments.

sign up to Nature briefing

What matters in science — and why — free in your inbox every weekday.

Sign up

Listen

new-pod-red

Nature Podcast

Our award-winning show features highlights from the week's edition of Nature, interviews with the people behind the science, and in-depth commentary and analysis from journalists around the world.