Nature | News

Silicon quantum computers take shape in Australia

Two blueprints emerge from centre tasked with creating a practical quantum device.

Article tools

UNSW

The refrigerator at the University of New South Wales that is used to cool silicon quantum chips.

Silicon is at the heart of the multibillion-dollar computing industry. Now, efforts to harness the element to build a quantum processor are taking off, thanks to elegant designs from an Australian collaboration.

In July, the Centre for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology, which is based at the University of New South Wales (UNSW) in Sydney, will receive the first instalment of a Aus$46-million (US$33-million) investment. The money comes from government and industry sources whose goal is to create a practical quantum computer.

At an innovation forum in London on 6 May, hosted by Nature and start-up accelerator Entrepreneur First, two physicists from a group at the UNSW pitched a plan to reach that goal. Their audience was a panel of entrepreneurs and scientists, who critiqued ideas for commercializing a range of quantum technologies, including sensors, computer security and a quantum internet as well as quantum computers.

So far, the UNSW team has demonstrated a system with quantum bits, or qubits, only in a single atom. Useful computations will require linking qubits in multiple atoms. But the team’s silicon qubits hold their quantum state nearly a million times longer than do systems made from superconducting circuits, a leading alternative, UNSW physicist Guilherme Tosi told participants at the event. This helps the silicon qubits to perform operations with one-sixth of the errors of superconducting circuits.

If the team can pull off this low error rate in a larger system, it would be “quite amazing”, said Hartmut Neven, director of engineering at Google and a member of the panel. But he cautioned that in terms of performance, the system is far behind others. The team is aiming for ten qubits in five years, but both Google and IBM are already approaching this with superconducting systems. And in five years, Google plans to have ramped up to hundreds of qubits.

A second group from the UNSW has a less robust silicon design that has already demonstrated calculations that link up two qubits, a building block that paves the way for creating more-complex devices.

In a regular computer, each bit can be ‘on’ or ‘off’. In a quantum computer, the qubits can be both on and off at once, which allows them to perform many computations in parallel. This should allow quantum computers to zip through calculations that would take a normal computer longer than the age of the Universe, although the best devices are still much too small to do so.

Silicon is an attractive base for a universal quantum computer — one that can carry out any quantum algorithm — because it is potentially compatible with the microelectronics of existing computers. But silicon systems are still years behind their rivals. One issue has been how to keep delicate quantum states alive for long enough to perform operations.

The scheme showcased at the innovation forum by Tosi and fellow physicist Vivien Schmitt — who are both part of Andrea Morello’s lab at the UNSW — addresses this challenge. The qubits are the spins of the electrons and nuclei in phosphorus atoms embedded in a silicon lattice, and are controlled using a special system of electric fields. Because the spins respond only to very specific, tuneable frequencies, they are robust to electrical noise. That allows the qubits to keep their quantum states for one minute and to operate perfectly 99.9% of the time, said Tosi.

Moreover, the electrically controlled qubits can communicate with each other at larger distances than can the qubits in other silicon designs. That bodes well for scaling up because the qubits can be far enough apart to allow room for control and read-out instruments to be placed between them. The atoms also do not need to be placed precisely, so they would fit with existing microprocessor-fabrication techniques, added Tosi.

UNSW

Andrew Dzurak (left) and Andrea Morello lead separate teams that are using silicon to build quantum processors.

Although Morello’s team has demonstrated the high precision only in a single atom, the researchers have started to experiment with a two-atom system, and expect this level of performance to scale up. “From there, there are no basic first-principle barriers,” said Tosi.

He has patented a design for a larger-scale computer and says that it should be possible to manufacture chips that use their system in plants similar to those already used to make present-day microprocessors.

Spin city

Another silicon project from UNSW, led by physicist Andrew Dzurak, uses as its qubits the spins of electrons in a set-up that is based on modified electrical transistors. Although the qubits are less robust than those in the Morello design, Dzurak’s team demonstrated two-qubit calculations last October.

At the London event, Tosi and Schmitt were grilled on the Morello team’s plan. “It’s a beautiful scheme,” said John Morton, an electrical engineer at University College London. But he cautioned that aspects of the business model that the duo presented as part of the event seemed reliant on superconducting qubits not getting any better. “That’s a risky thing to do,” Morton said. Neven agreed, pointing out that silicon qubits will need to demonstrate advantages in other areas if they are to get a foothold in the future quantum-computer market.

Like superconducting qubits, silicon qubits must be kept at a fraction of a degree above absolute zero. Morton said that the Morello design’s big advantage is that the qubits are atomic scale. In principle, that would allow many more to be placed on each chip than is possible with superconducting qubits, which are around 100 micrometres across. To seize this opportunity, the design needs to shed the bulky microwave devices that it proposes as its means to operate between distant qubits, said Neven.

The successes of the Australian quantum centre — which is led by UNSW physicist Michelle Simmons — are partly down to its wider expertise in nanoscale silicon fabrication, says Peter Knight, a physicist at Imperial College London and a panel member at the event. When it comes to fabrication, he says, the centre is way ahead of others working in silicon.

Journal name:
Nature
Volume:
533,
Pages:
448–449
Date published:
()
DOI:
doi:10.1038/533448a

For the best commenting experience, please login or register as a user and agree to our Community Guidelines. You will be re-directed back to this page where you will see comments updating in real-time and have the ability to recommend comments to other users.

Comments for this thread are now closed.

Comments

Comments Subscribe to comments

There are currently no comments.

sign up to Nature briefing

What matters in science — and why — free in your inbox every weekday.

Sign up

Listen

new-pod-red

Nature Podcast

Our award-winning show features highlights from the week's edition of Nature, interviews with the people behind the science, and in-depth commentary and analysis from journalists around the world.