Published online 17 August 2011 | Nature 476, 259-260 (2011) | doi:10.1038/476259a


Brazil revisits forest code

Changes to legislation could undermine authorities' power to halt deforestation.

A tough-minded law has boosted Brazil's environmental record in recent years by helping to drive the rate of destruction in the Amazon rainforest to historic lows. But a backlash in the hinterlands is threatening to weaken the country's forest code and push deforestation rates back up again.

Soya bean farming in the Amazon is rising along with food prices, contributing to an increase in the rate of deforestation for the first time in years.Soya bean farming in the Amazon is rising along with food prices, contributing to an increase in the rate of deforestation for the first time in years.R. BALEIA/LATINCONTENT/GETTY IMAGES

Brazil's National Institute for Space Research (INPE) began reporting spikes in deforestation in March, two months before the nation's House of Representatives passed a bill to change the law that governs forests, which has been in force since 1965. The legislation includes clauses supported by agribusiness and small landowners that scale back federal authority and grant immunity from prosecution for all deforestation before 2008. The bill is now pending in the Senate — and is opposed by the administration of President Dilma Rousseff — but some observers say that the debate alone has emboldened landowners to clear more land.

The tensions have been fuelled by high prices for commodities such as soya beans and beef, which have driven up demand for arable land while giving farmers and ranchers the cash they need to bring in chainsaws and bulldozers, says Dan Nepstad, a US ecologist who works with the Amazon Environmental Research Institute in Brasília. Meanwhile, he says, authorities are stuck trying to enforce a law that is strict, complex and difficult to comply with. "What Brazil has created is in many ways sort of the perfect recipe for a rural insurrection," Nepstad says.

But the Rousseff administration is not backing down. Deforestation causes some 15% of global greenhouse-gas emissions and 75% of Brazil's. Rousseff's predecessor, Luis Inácio Lula da Silva, promised during the 2009 climate talks in Copenhagen that Brazil would cut deforestation by 80% by 2020. Although Rousseff is not known as an environmentalist, she has maintained Lula's pledge and sent hundreds of law-enforcement officers into the Amazon as deforestation spiked.

The world will get its first glimpse of the results later this month, when the INPE releases its preliminary analysis of the annual deforestation season that ended in July. Some analyses already indicate that the stepped-up enforcement has helped. According to an analysis of satellite data by the non-profit research institute Imazon in Belém, deforestation was actually 42% lower this June than last.


"Deforestation is going to increase in 2011, but it won't be a big jump," says Carlos Souza, a remote-sensing scientist who heads Imazon's satellite analysis. Imazon says that cumulative deforestation between August 2010 and June 2011 rose by 15% compared with the same period the season before. If that number holds up in the final analysis using higher resolution satellite data, it would still be the second lowest loss on record (see 'Clearing the Amazon'). "We could say that the situation is still under control," says Souza.

Many scientists fear that the new law will cause further backsliding. For now, all landowners in the Amazon must maintain forest on 80% of their land, and those who had cleared illegally must reforest to that level. The House bill, however, would create exemptions for small landowners, and allow state governments to adjust the 80% rule.

All told, the changes could legalize the clearing of more than 220,000 square kilometres — an area nearly the size of the United Kingdom — according to an analysis by researchers at the University of São Paulo. Thomas Lovejoy, a tropical ecologist at the Heinz Center in Washington DC, says that the bill is a "recipe for Amazon dieback", a feedback loop that decreases rainfall and could convert vast swathes of rainforest into savannah.


But the bill could still be reformed in the Senate. Nepstad is pushing for an affordable way for older violators to comply, and for a credible punishment for new offenders. He says that the government needs to start investing in schemes to protect forest carbon and rewarding frustrated landowners who have obeyed the law while their neighbours cleared more land. If the law can't be enforced, he adds, the alluring profits of agriculture could lead to a "new wave" of deforestation.

Although rural interests have dominated the debate so far, most people share the concerns of the scientific community, says Luiz Martinelli, an ecologist at the University of São Paulo in Piracicaba who is analysing the legislation for senators. A national poll conducted in June by environmental groups found that 85% of Brazilians rate forest protection above agricultural production. "Brazilian society is kind of sick of this deforestation drama," Martinelli says. 

Commenting is now closed.