Published online 1 December 2009 | Nature 462, 550-551 (2009) | doi:10.1038/462550a

News

China's climate target: is it achievable?

The world's top emitter pledges cuts, but "substantial societal reforms" are needed to make them.

Reuters

Climate analysts are praising China's promise to slash the country's emissions — even as they wonder if the target is achievable or ambitious enough.

Last week, China's State Council announced that the country will cut its carbon intensity — carbon emissions per unit of gross domestic product (GDP) — by 40–45% from 2005 levels by 2020. "It is a very welcome decision," says Fatih Birol, chief economist at the International Energy Agency in Paris. "If the target is met, it would have significant implications for China and the rest of the world."

Yet some think that the target is not far-reaching enough given China's booming economy and its track record of improving energy efficiency. The country reduced its energy intensity — energy consumption per unit of GDP — by 47% between 1990 and 2005, and looks likely to cut it by another 20% from 2005 levels by the end of next year. Carbon intensity can drop faster than energy intensity if clean-energy sources are brought into the mix.

Xie Zhenhua, deputy director of China's National Development and Reform Commission, says that China has picked low-hanging fruit by closing energy-inefficient factories and power plants. In China, industry accounts for an unusually large share — 50% — of energy consumption. "The further we go, the more challenging and costly it will get," he says.

If China sticks to current policies, it will reduce its carbon intensity by about 30% by 2020, says Zou Ji, an environmental economist at Renmin University in Beijing. "To get extra mileage and reach the 40–45% target, China will have to instigate substantial social and economic reforms across the board," he says.

Indeed, the China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development (CCICED), a joint Chinese and international advisory board to the state government, recently laid out a road map to a low-carbon economy. It includes recommendations in such wide-ranging areas as energy pricing, industrial development, technological innovation, tax systems, land use and urban planning. "The daunting challenge that China faces cannot be underestimated," says Zou. "The concern is not only whether China is willing to make that step forward but whether its development state will allow a smooth economic transition."

Emissions peak

The new pledge will be included in China's next five-year plan along with policies to help it shift towards a low-carbon economy.

The target puts China on a path for emissions to peak around 2030, says Knut Alfsen, head of research at the Center for International Climate and Environmental Research in Oslo, and an author on the CCICED report. That peak, he says, "will take place at a level where emissions per capita are only half of what we have in the developed world today".

China's announcement came the day after US President Barack Obama pledged to cut his country's emissions by 17% from 2005 levels by 2020. It is the first time that the world's top two emitters have offered specific targets at the same time for controlling their emissions.

"It's very important for the two countries to put numbers on the table," says Jim Watson, a policy researcher at the University of Sussex in Brighton, UK.

In recent weeks other developing countries have made ambitious pledges. South Korea has promised a 30% cut below a business-as-usual scenario, and Brazil at least a 36% cut by 2020. Both would be modest cuts compared with 2005 emissions.

India followed China's announcement by saying it would "be willing to sign on to an ambitious global target for emissions reductions or limiting temperature increase" — but with the catch that "this must be accompanied by an equitable burden-sharing paradigm". China and India, along with Brazil, South Africa and Sudan, last weekend reiterated developing countries' insistence that developed nations help bear the cost of climate change, including facilitating technology transfer (see page 555).

So far, the European Union has pledged the most aggressive emissions cuts in the developed world, of 20% from 1990 levels by 2020, to be increased to 30% below if rich non-EU nations follow suit. The US target announced last week would be equivalent to a 3% reduction from 1990 levels.

Obama must also work with the Democrat-­dominated Congress to pass climate legislation that would make its targets binding. The 17% cut he announced last week is in agreement with a bill passed by the House of Representatives earlier this year. The Senate is expected to vote on its own version of climate legislation early in 2010. The Environmental Protection Agency has the authority to regulate carbon dioxide emissions if Congress does not act.

ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile, the Australian parliament has been trying to pass a climate ruling that would cut emissions by up to 25% from 2000 levels by 2020. But on 1 December, the main opposition party elected a new leader who has vowed to oppose the bill, throwing its future into jeopardy. Australia has the highest emissions per capita of any developed nation.

China, if it sticks to its plans, may end up leading the way for developing countries. Compared with current levels, the new target would avoid 1 gigatonne of carbon dioxide emissions — equivalent to a quarter of what the world would need to do to limit global temperature rise to 2 °C over pre-industrial times. "China would champion the fight against global warming," says Birol. 

For more, see News, page 555, and www.nature.com/roadtocopenhagen

Comments

If you find something abusive or inappropriate or which does not otherwise comply with our Terms or Community Guidelines, please select the relevant 'Report this comment' link.

Comments on this thread are vetted after posting.

  • #60032

    If all other developed countries were putting an 80% cut on the table, I think China could be named and shamed and sanctioned for objecting. And if one rogue country single highhandedly derailed an otherwise world changing agreement the 'source' would not remain anonymous and would be hailed as a whilsteblower. Lastly it is infuriating that legitimate news sources continue to frame emissions rates per country and not per capita. China is a rapidly industrializing country with 1.3 billion people and which manufactures a vast majority of the world's consumer goods, and yet it's per capita emissions are about 1/4th of the US.

Commenting is now closed.