Introduction

The Pacific accounts for 50% of the total ocean volume, such that changes in its average chemistry may exert a significant influence on that of the global average ocean and therefore that of the atmosphere and the Earth’s climate. Indeed, it has long been proposed that a reduction in the ocean’s average rate of overturn1 and/or ocean-atmosphere CO2 exchange2 may have been the single most important contributor to reduced atmospheric CO2 during past glacial periods, and that this would be confirmed by the identification of a significant increase in the average extent of radiocarbon depletion (that is, the ocean-atmosphere radiocarbon disequilibrium or radiocarbon ‘ventilation age’) in the Pacific Ocean during the last glacial period3. Despite a surge of marine radiocarbon studies focusing on this issue in recent years, and despite circumstantial support for this hypothesis from atmospheric radiocarbon concentration and production reconstructions4,5,6, the glacial radiocarbon inventory of the Pacific Ocean and its evolution across the last deglaciation remain poorly constrained.

Thus, radiocarbon ventilation reconstructions from throughout the mid-depth (500–1,500 m) and deep (>1,500 m) Pacific are in apparent conflict, with some indicating very little or no change in radiocarbon ventilation between the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and the pre-industrial period3,7,8,9,10,11,12,13, some indicating transient anomalies of varying magnitude and sense14,15,16,17, and with others showing quite significant changes, expressed as a net change between the LGM and the pre-industrial18,19,20,21 or as a positive anomaly in the deglaciation22,23,24,25 (Table 1). Although much of the apparent conflict between the various Pacific radiocarbon ventilation records may reflect small-scale aspects of the glacial circulation as compared with the present (resulting in highly localized signals or errors in water-mass attribution), it could also reflect to a large extent the different methods and assumptions that are adopted in the various studies.

Table 1 Summary of radiocarbon ventilation records from the Pacific Ocean over the last deglaciation grouped by water depth (>1,500 m/<1,500 m) and area.

Perhaps the most important methodological consideration is whether or not independent calendar age control, and therefore surface reservoir age reconstructions are available. It is notable that most of the existing radiocarbon ventilation records from the Pacific are based on the commonly used method of calculating benthic-planktonic radiocarbon age offsets (B–P) (Table 1), which ignores the possible impact of variable surface reservoir ages on the inferred radiocarbon disequilibrium of deep waters relative to the atmosphere (that is, the benthic-atmosphere radiocarbon age offset (B-Atm)). Furthermore, it is also notable that studies adopting this method or the 14C projection-age method26, and assuming invariant surface reservoir ages, tend not to find evidence of poorly ventilated glacial mid/deep Pacific ocean waters3,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,15,16,17 (Table 1). However, numerical model experiments have suggested that surface reservoir age should in principle have varied since the last glacial period27, and this has been confirmed via a range of techniques applied, not only in the Pacific Ocean17,20,21,24, but also in the Southern Atlantic Ocean28 and other basins29,30. Notably, Siani et al.24 suggested that data from a previous study at a nearby location (core SO161-SL22 (ref. 12)) would indeed show significant changes in ventilation ages over the glacial period if their surface reservoir ages were taken into account. These observations serve to underline the importance of assessing the variability of the surface reservoir ages, especially when using the B–P offset approach to calculate radiocarbon ventilation ages.

Today, the Southern Ocean is the main region where water from the ocean interior makes its first contact with the surface, and where surface water first enters the ocean interior31. It is also the main source of deep and abyssal water exported to the rest of the global ocean32, and it therefore plays a key role in the water-mass budget and the ventilation (that is, the mixing of surface water properties into the ocean interior) of the Pacific Ocean33. It is for this reason that the Southern Ocean has been proposed as the main area for the release of ‘old’ carbon-rich deep-water from the ocean interior at the close of the last glacial, possibly due to increased upwelling and/or air–sea gas exchange as a result of altered winds34 and/or sea-ice/shallow sub-surface density stratification28,35. A connection between the high and low latitude Pacific is provided through upwelled shallow sub-surface/intermediate waters from the Southern Ocean (See Methods for further details) in the Eastern Equatorial Pacific (EEP) via the Equatorial Undercurrent (EUC), identified for both the modern36,37,38 and the glacial circulation34,39,40,41,42. This far-field dynamical connection would imply that changes occurring in the Southern Ocean should exert an influence on the hydrography of the thermocline in low latitude areas like the EEP. The EEP thus provides an excellent study location for assessing past changes in Pacific radiocarbon ventilation, in particular where these are believed to originate in the Southern Ocean.

Here we present deep and shallow sub-surface (that is, deep thermocline) radiocarbon ventilation age reconstructions for the EEP, from sediment core ODP Site 1240 located in the Panama Basin (0°01.31′ N, 86°27.76′ W; 2,921 m water depth). This core site is currently bathed by Upper Circumpolar Deep Water (UCDW) and/or Pacific Deep Water (PDW), with southern sourced shallow sub-surface/intermediate waters contributing to the EEP thermocline via the EUC. Deep-water radiocarbon ventilation ages are estimated from B–P age offsets (B: mixed benthic foraminifera; P: Neogloboquadrina dutertrei, a deep thermocline-dwelling planktonic foraminifer, 100–150 m water depth43), plus a variable shallow sub-surface reservoir age (yielding B-Atm age offsets), which is derived on the basis of chronostratigraphic alignment to Greenland ice-core records. Notably, the revised chronology that we derive for this core implies a significant increase in both deep-water and shallow sub-surface radiocarbon reservoir/ventilation ages during the last glacial period in the EEP, consistent with a significant change in the radiocarbon concentration of waters exported from the Southern Ocean to the rest of the global ocean during the last glacial period.

Results

Radiocarbon dates and B–P offsets in core ODP Site 1240

Seventeen paired planktonic and benthic radiocarbon measurements and the offset between them (B–P) are shown in Fig. 1a,b, respectively, and in Supplementary Table 1. Of the data shown in Fig. 1a,b, three B–P pairs (depth intervals 26, 223 and 289; see Fig. 1b in grey) were flagged up as potential outliers in our present study, on the basis that these three pairs yield B–P offsets that fall anomalously far away from the three-point running mean of the data set and that the benthic ages converge on their planktonic counterparts far more rapidly than could be expected due to real changes in deep-ocean circulation/ventilation. However, we show these tentative flyers in Fig. 1a,b, and note that it is possible (if not presently demonstrable) that other studies in the region might in future provide support for their veracity.

Figure 1: Summary of planktonic and benthic radiocarbon dates and their offsets from core ODP1240.
figure 1

(a) Radiocarbon dates from N. dutertrei (red triangles) and mixed benthic foraminifera (black triangles) (all dates were δ13C-normalized, without reservoir age correction and uncalibrated to calendar years), with associated 1σ-uncertainties. The discarded B–P offsets are indicated by a grey vertical arrow. Note that planktonic dates from intervals 77/78 and 117/118 were averaged for B–P calculation to be able to compare with the coeval benthic radiocarbon dates, which were combined due the low carbonate abundance of each interval (see Methods and Supplementary Table 1). (b) Benthic-Planktonic radiocarbon offset (B–P) (thick light blue line and stars) plus the discarded B–P offsets (stapled light grey line) (error bars represent combined 1σ error in 14C dates). Modern B–P offset is shown by a dashed horizontal line and relevant climatic periods are separated by dashed vertical lines.

The 14 retained radiocarbon B–P pairs (Fig. 1b) indicate a change of 870 year between the last part of the last glacial period (average B–P 1,805 year) and the Holocene (average B–P 935 year, including the modern B–P offset of 1,250 year; see Methods for further detail). Across the deglaciation, decreasing B–P offsets indicate enhanced deep-ocean ventilation that peaks in the early Holocene and then drops again to modern values across this period. These results thus provide clear evidence for a drop in deep equatorial Pacific radiocarbon ventilation ages since the LGM.

Reservoir age assessment and age model

An assessment of shallow sub-surface reservoir age variability at the location of ODP1240 (Fig. 2) has been performed by chronostratigraphic alignment between the δ18Oice and the [Ca2+] records from three Greenland ice cores (NGRIP, GRIP and GISP2 (ref. 44)) placed on the recent GICC05 time scale45 and two independent records from Site 1240: (a) Sea Surface Temperature (SST) based on the index (Calvo et al., unpublished) and (b) δ18Osw obtained from the planktonic foraminifer Globigerinoides ruber40. Our proposed alignments are based on a host of previous studies, including previous palaeoclimate reconstructions/interpretations and numerical model studies all of which support the underlying premise of our stratigraphic alignments46,47,48. The outcome of this previous work is that anomalies in sea surface temperatures recorded by alkenones and surface salinities reflected in surface water δ18O reconstructions at our location should coincide in time with North Atlantic/Greenland temperature anomalies. There is a set of well tested physical mechanisms underlying this correspondence that relate to changes in cross-equatorial temperature gradients and their impact on easterly winds, equatorial upwelling and moisture transport across the Isthmus of Panama.

Figure 2: Surface reservoir age assessment for ODP1240 sediment core through the alignment between two independent ODP1240 records and three Greenland ice cores over the last 25 kyr.
figure 2

(a) [Ca2+] and (b) δ18O records from Greenland ice cores44: NGRIP (grey), GRIP (yellow) and GISP2 (green). Small vertical arrows above Greenland δ18O records indicate the apparent HS1 onset for each ice core. (c) SSTs from the index and (d) δ18Osw (G. ruber)40 records from ODP1240 core. In blue, the alignment based on the SST tie-points, and in orange based on the δ18Osw (G. ruber) tie-points. (e) Estimated reservoir age scenarios for ODP1240 core using the two alignments: Thick central lines represent the best reservoir age estimate and stapled lines their upper and lower reservoir age limits (by taking an alignment uncertainty of ±200 year) (in orange, based on the SST correlation, and in blue based on the δ18Osw (G. ruber) correlation). Selected tie-points are indicated at the bottom by black triangles. An additional core-top date (from the study by Pena et al.40), corrected and calibrated is also shown (grey triangle). Light grey bands highlight the coldest periods of the last 25 kyr and delimit relevant climatic periods.

For this alignment, four stratigraphic tie-points from the ice-core records were selected coinciding with major climatic changes at the Heinrich Stadial 2 (HS2) end, the HS1 onset, the HS1/Bølling-Allerød transition and the Younger Dryas end (Fig. 2; Supplementary Table 2). The HS1 onset was designated only through the change in the [Ca2+] record at 17.6 kyr since precipitation δ18O records from the various Greenland ice cores present differences between 19–16 kyr due to different site locations (Fig. 2a,b). An additional age constraint for the ODP1240 core-top was derived based on a single calibrated radiocarbon date (from the study by Pena et al.40), corrected for the modern shallow sub-surface reservoir age in the area (this is 735 year; see Methods for further detail).

On the basis of the above chronologies, two sets of reservoir age estimates were generated (that is, one from each ODP1240 record used for stratigraphic alignment) (Fig. 2e; Supplementary Table 2). These differ due to slight mismatches between the patterns of SST and δ18Osw variability before 17 kyr (Fig. 2c,d). Reservoir ages were calculated as the difference between the interpolated ODP1240 planktonic 14C for each tie-point28 and the atmospheric 14C-age (IntCal09 curve49) at the calendar age of each tie-point (note that we have not used the more recent IntCal13 (ref. 50) radiocarbon calibration curve to avoid possible problems of inconsistency when comparing with previously published radiocarbon studies that are referenced to IntCal09; only minor differences would arise if IntCal13 were used instead). This approach provides reservoir age estimates only at the four proposed calendar age tie-points. An alternative approach of interpolating calendar ages (and on this basis 14C atm) for all the planktonic radiocarbon dates in ODP1240 would yield spurious reservoir ages where no direct calendar age constraints exist (as would occur in the Holocene, for example, where no tie-points were designated).

Four age models were thus derived using the Bayesian age-depth modelling programme Bchron51 and the IntCal09 radiocarbon calibration curve49 (Fig. 3; Supplementary Table 3): (a) two of them by calibrating 17 N. dutertrei radiocarbon dates corrected for the two sets of reservoir age estimates; and (b) two more using only the stratigraphic tie-points (Fig. 3). The purpose of this was to check the consistency of the age models when ignoring the radiocarbon age constraints between stratigraphic tie-points, as well as the radiocarbon age reversals that are automatically rejected by Bchron as outliers in the first two age models. Notably, all of these four chronologies are in good agreement, indicating a good degree of consistency between the various chronostratigraphic constraints that we have adopted, within their respective uncertainty ranges. Only across the Holocene, where no stratigraphic tie-points were selected, do large differences between the radiocarbon and stratigraphic age models emerge, reflecting significant changes in sedimentation rate that cannot be captured by our stratigraphic alignment over this interval. Finally, circumstantial support for the age models is also provided by the fact that deglacial minima in the N. dutertrei δ13C record from ODP1240 (ref. 40) correspond with similar δ13C minima and peak upwelling intensities observed in the Southern Ocean35, which also broadly coincide with two prominent minima in the atmospheric δ13CO2 record (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Figure 3: Age models for core ODP1240.
figure 3

Four possible Bchron age models and their uncertainties (95% HDR range) for core ODP1240 derived from; (a) two from the δ18O(Greenland ice cores)—SST(ODP1240) records alignment (orange curves) and (b) two from the δ18O(Greenland ice cores)—δ18Osw (G. ruber) (ODP1240) records alignment (blue curve). Thick solid lines and stars represent the age models derived only from the tie-points (the error is 200 year). Thin solid lines and squares denote age models using the planktonic radiocarbon measurements corrected for the correspondent interpolated reservoir age obtained from the alignments. (c) Sedimentation rates (SR) obtained from the four age models; Shaded areas correspond to SR using only the tie-points and solid lines using the radiocarbon dates. As for a and b, orange colours refer to the SST alignment, and blue colours refer to the δ18Osw (G. ruber) alignment.

The two sets of reservoir age estimates show a broadly similar pattern of variability across the last deglaciation, indicating large changes in the shallow sub-surface ocean ventilation over this time interval (Fig. 2e). Quantitatively, small differences are found between both SST and δ18Osw alignments, yielding glacial shallow sub-surface reservoir ages of 970 years and 1,105 years, respectively, that is 405 and 540 years older than during the Holocene (when reservoir ages are 565 years on average, including the modern value of 735 years). As shown in Fig. 2e, shallow sub-surface reservoir ages begin to decline coincident with the beginning of the deglaciation (HS1 onset), continuing to drop across HS1 until minimum reservoir ages (that is, maximum ventilation) are reached around the HS1/B-A transition.

Ventilation ages in the EEP

Using the observed radiocarbon offsets between B–P (Figs 1b and 4a) and between planktonic-atmosphere (that is, reservoir ages; Figs 2e and 4b), the offset between B-Atm (that is, deep-ocean ventilation; calculated as B-Atm=B–P+R.age; Fig. 4c) can be estimated. Thus, Fig. 4 displays the ventilation history at the location of ODP1240, taking into account all four possible age models and their associated reservoir age implications.

Figure 4: Ventilation scenarios for core ODP1240 over the past 25 kyr using the four estimated age models from Fig. 3 in each case.
figure 4

Age models are b-spline smoothed. (a) B–P offset; (b) Shallow sub-surface reservoir age; (c) Ventilation age (B-Atm offset). Thick solid lines with stars denote age models using the planktonic radiocarbon measurements corrected for the correspondent interpolated reservoir age obtained from the alignments, and thin stapled lines with squares represent the age model derived only from the tie-points (hollow/solid stars and squares corresponds to alignments, respectively, in all cases). Modern offsets are shown by dashed horizontal lines. Light grey bands highlight the coldest periods of the last 25 kyr and delimit relevant climatic periods. Note the different y-axis scale in ac.

As observed in the shallow sub-surface reservoir age reconstructions, the deep-ocean ventilation (Fig. 4c) also exhibits different amplitude and slightly different trends since the LGM depending on the various alignments (SST or δ18Osw), but still broadly similar patterns of variability. Quantitatively, the averages from both SST and δ18Osw alignments indicate B-Atm values of 2,775 years and 2,910 years, respectively, during the last part of the glacial period, which would correspond to a 1,275 and 1,410 years older deep glacial ocean than during the Holocene (on average 1,500 years including the modern B-Atm value of 1,985 year at 3,000 m water depth; see Methods for further detail). Enhanced ventilation of the deep eastern Pacific is thus observed from the start of HS1, with peak ventilation (minimum B-Atm) being reached at the end of the deglaciation, in the early Holocene (Fig. 4c).

Discussion

The ventilation reconstructions from Site ODP1240 indicate a glacial-interglacial B–P change of 870 years that, taking into account the shallow sub-surface (deep thermocline) reservoir age change of 405/540 years (from both SST and δ18Osw alignments, respectively), imply a glacial-interglacial B-Atm change of 1,275/1,410 years (Fig. 4; Supplementary Table 3). Taken together, these results indicate that both deep and shallow sub-surface reservoir ages (Fig. 4c,b, respectively) were significantly increased at the LGM and that both evolved in a similar manner over the last 25 kyr, albeit with a larger change in the deep ventilation ages (as indicated by the change in B–P across the deglaciation; Fig. 4a). Therefore, although the B–P data themselves indicate for the first time a clear deglacial change in deep equatorial Pacific ventilation (Figs 1b and 4a), the B-Atm estimates further suggest that the B–P offsets in fact underestimate this change in deep-ocean ventilation (Fig. 4a,c).

A poorly ventilated glacial shallow sub-surface and deep EEP is thus demonstrated, both by the B–P offsets and B-Atm offsets, with implications for the glacial ocean’s total radiocarbon inventory and its role in glacial-interglacial CO2 change6. Indeed, the radiocarbon ventilation rate of both the thermocline and the deep EEP are observed to increase broadly in time with the onset of deglaciation, the rise in atmospheric CO252 and the drop in atmospheric 14C4,50 (Fig. 5a,b). These results would thus support the hypothesized role of reduced ocean-atmosphere CO2 exchange rates in sequestering carbon in the glacial ocean interior, and the release of this carbon to the atmosphere across the last termination. The demonstration of reduced radiocarbon ventilation rates in both the deep and shallow sub-surface Pacific Ocean is crucial in this respect, as this basin accounts for 50% of the ocean’s total volume. Thus, small ventilation or carbon sequestration effects in the Pacific can have a particularly large impact on global ocean chemistry, as well as that of the atmosphere.

Figure 5: Comparison of reservoir and ventilation age reconstructions from the South Pacific and Southern Ocean over the last deglaciation grouped according to their likely water-mass affiliations.
figure 5

(a) Atmospheric CO2 concentrations from European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica (EPICA) Dome C (EDC) ice core (for the deglacial period see ref. 52; for the Holocene period see ref. 68) placed on the age scale of ref. 69. (b) Atmospheric radiocarbon activity (Δ14C) changes (IntCal09 calibration curve49). (c) Surface/shallow sub-surface reservoir age records and (d) deep-water ventilation reconstructions from several locations in the Pacific and Southern Oceans over the last 25 kyr (B-spline smoothed): ODP1240 (2,921 m; N. dutertrei; dark blue hollow/solid stars from SST/δ18Osw alignments, respectively; this study); TR163-31B (3,210 m; N. dutertrei; red hollow big/small circles from SST/δ18Osw alignments in ODP1240, respectively18); Bay of Plenty (1,675–2,065 m; Globorotalia inflata; green stars19); MD97-2121 (2,314 m; G. inflata; yellow dots21); MD07-3088 (1,536 m; Globigerina bulloides; light orange diamonds from54,55; dark orange diamonds from24); MD07-3076 (3,770 m; G. bulloides and G. inflata; dark grey dots28); Corals from the Drake Passage (300–800 m ‘shallow corals’; small light blue triangles and 700–1,800 m ‘deep corals’ small dark green dots57). Note that the age models used for ODP1240 are those obtained using the calibrated radiocarbon dates and not the tie-points. Note the y-axis breaks in d. (e) Locations of marine records shown in c,d.

The changes in B–P offsets between the LGM and modern observed in ODP1240 clearly reflect a discernable trend in deep equatorial Pacific ventilation across the last deglaciation that is consistent with other B–P records from the northern and southern high latitude Pacific Ocean (southwest Pacific (SWP)19,21; southeast Pacific (SEP)24; northeast Pacific (NEP)22). All of these studies indicate slightly higher B–P age offsets during the last glacial period (200–600 years) and, although they are not extremely large, they should not be downplayed. Indeed, it has been argued that the full 190‰ drop in atmospheric Δ14C since the LGM (ignoring changes in radiocarbon production) could in principle be explained by rather small changes in the mean ventilation age of the whole upper ocean (for example, 100 years over 60% of the ocean) if these were combined with a slightly larger change in the mean ventilation of the deepest ocean (for example, 3,000 years on average, over 35% of the ocean)28.

Although B–P offsets are clearly observed to decrease across the last deglaciation (Figs 1b and 4a), a larger drop in B-Atm offsets is inferred on the basis of our shallow sub-surface reservoir age reconstructions. In a first instance, we explore the regional coherence of our shallow sub-surface reservoir age reconstructions via a comparison of planktonic stable isotope records from our core and core TR163-31B (ref. 18; located in the same area and also with N. dutertrei radiocarbon dates), performed by placing each core on its own conventional 14C-age scale (Supplementary Fig. 2). For this purpose we use the radiocarbon data from ref. 18. The fact that the isotope stratigraphies and radiocarbon data from the two cores are consistent (Supplementary Fig. 2) indicates that both locations have experienced broadly similar reservoir age changes. On this basis, a ‘regional radiocarbon calibration’ can be used to transfer calendar ages (and therefore reservoir ages) from ODP1240 to TR163-31B. This in turn allows B-Atm offsets to be derived for core TR163-31B, using the few available benthic radiocarbon dates from ref. 18, as described below.

While the comparison described above demonstrates that similar reservoir age changes were experienced at the locations of ODP1240 and TR163-31B, it does not provide an independent confirmation of the reservoir ages we derive for ODP1240. However, direct support for our observation of significantly enhanced glacial shallow sub-surface reservoir ages is provided by the few studies in the South Pacific Ocean that have also sought to constrain reservoir age variability using paleoceanographic observations (Fig. 5c). Thus, in the SWP a pioneering study in the Bay of Plenty, using 14C-dated tephra, found a considerable increase in shallow sub-surface reservoir ages during the last glacial period19 that, with the recently updated age for the Kawakawa tephra53, increases the inferred glacial reservoir ages to 3,200 years. The latter is an extreme value for a shallow sub-surface radiocarbon reservoir age in the modern context and, although it may yet be proven correct, we tentatively report the Bay of Plenty data in Fig. 5 excluding the glacial point. Indeed, a recent study in the same area (SWP) in core MD97-2121, also using the revised age of the Kawakawa tephra and radiocarbon dates on the same deep dwelling planktonic species (Globigerina inflata), found a 337 years increase in shallow sub-surface reservoir ages, from 700 to 1,037 years, during the last glacial period21. The latter values compare well with other reservoir age estimates from core MD07-3088 in the SEP, also based on tephrostratigraphy and marine radiocarbon dates in G. bulloides, which indicate 500 years older reservoir ages over the latest part of the deglaciation, as compared with modern54,55. These reservoir age estimates have been extended beyond the range of available 14C-dated tephra by assuming an inverse relationship between B–P offsets and planktonic versus benthic foraminiferal Δδ13C from the same core, suggesting that increased surface reservoir ages also prevailed during the earlier part of the deglaciation24.

The coherence of these various surface reservoir age estimates19,21,24 (including those from this study) from different regions and water column depths may be explained by the transport pathways that link them together in the modern ocean circulation, as noted by a large number of studies36,38,56. Under the premise that the glacial circulation pathways were not wildly different from the modern (that is, a broadly similar pattern of buoyancy and wind forcing), a numerical model simulation21 can be used to show a direct dynamical connection between all these areas and depths (Fig. 6). This illustrates that an increase in the shallow sub-surface reservoir age across the Southern Ocean (for example, as proposed by Skinner et al.28) should also be conveyed to the shallow sub-surface of the EEP and SWP via the dominant transport pathways in the ocean interior (Fig. 6), as is also indicated for the surface SEP, where G. bulloides (dated by Siani et al.24) currently thrives.

Figure 6: Numerical model simulation.
figure 6

Marine radiocarbon ages (relative to the atmosphere), as reported by Skinner et al.21, showing ages for 18 and 187 m water depth. The simulation adopts the model framework of DeVries et al.70 and assumes the modern circulation, albeit with >1,000 year surface reservoir ages arbitrarily imposed in the Southern Ocean. The simulation thus demonstrates how an increase in Southern Ocean surface reservoir ages would be transmitted to other regions of the global ocean, including the EEP in particular, simply due to the dominant transport pathways of the ocean circulation. Coherent surface reservoir age changes in the Southern Pacific, Southern Atlantic and EEP could conceivably be explained in this way.

In agreement with this proposition, ODP1240 shallow sub-surface reservoir ages also generally exhibit trends and values that are consistent with reconstructions from the Southern Ocean, including the records based on chronostratigraphically dated planktonic foraminifera from core MD07-3076 from the sub-Antarctic Atlantic28 and Drake Passage corals from water depths of 300–800 m and 700–1,800 m (hereafter referred to as ‘shallow corals’ and ‘deep corals’, respectively)57 (Fig. 5c). The planktonic foraminifera from core MD07-3076 would have lived north of the Sub-Antarctic Front where some intermediate waters are subducted and the ‘shallow corals’ from the Drake Passage have been interpreted to provide a record of Antarctic Intermediate Water (AAIW) ventilation ages. Interestingly, the ‘deep corals’, although initially proposed to reflect the radiocarbon ventilation age of UCDW, are rather similar to the rest of the shallow sub-surface/intermediate water candidate reconstructions (Fig. 5c). This could suggest that, at least over the glacial/deglacial period, the deep Drake Passage corals might have been substantially influenced by SO-intermediate waters, instead of UCDW as previously proposed57. Such an interpretation would also help to reconcile the large differences between glacial ventilation ages observed in the deep Drake Passage corals57 versus the deep sub-Antarctic Atlantic28, which would reflect a large radiocarbon ventilation age gradient between AAIW and LCDW, rather than between UCDW and LCDW.

This consistency between shallow sub-surface reservoir ages in the EEP and the Atlantic and Pacific sectors of the Southern Ocean would support the idea of the proposed link between these two regions through shallow sub-surface/intermediate waters transported by the EUC to the base of the EEP thermocline; an idea that has been advanced previously based on other records34,39,40,41. We therefore propose here that the variability we see in N. dutertrei from ODP1240 is primarily related to the changing Southern Ocean end-member signature that is being ‘upwelled’ in (or at least transported to) the base of the EEP thermocline (where N. dutertrei lives), rather than, shifts in N. dutertrei’s habitat towards the Southern Ocean end-member, for example due to ‘more upwelling’. Nevertheless, we underline that this interpretation is not inconsistent with evidence for variable upwelling in the EEP, or indeed for changes in the contribution of southern sourced water in the EUC42. Such changes would only exacerbate the impacts that we infer by making N. dutertrei experience sub-surface waters that are more similar to an ‘older/younger’ Southern Ocean origin, even if the latter effect was the largest, as we propose on the basis of the regional comparisons and associations shown in Fig. 5 and the numerical model ‘thought experiment’ illustrated in Fig. 6.

Regardless of their dynamical associations, or indeed their causes, increased glacial surface/shallow sub-surface reservoir ages have been reconstructed across the South Pacific and Southern Ocean using a range of different approaches, including U-series dating of corals57, tephrochronology19,21,24 and chronostratigraphic alignments28 as well as radiocarbon ‘plateau tuning’ records in the North Pacific20. Along with the results of this study, these observations challenge the common assumption of invariant reservoir ages, in particular at high latitudes but also in tropical upwelling areas, as we emphasize here.

In addition to this general agreement of surface/shallow sub-surface reservoir age reconstructions, a broad similarity between deep ventilation age variability across the Equatorial and South Pacific as well as across the Southern Ocean is also apparent (Fig. 5d). Thus, B-Atm estimates from core ODP1240 indicate a significant glacial/interglacial change in radiocarbon ventilation, as also observed in the nearby core TR163-31B when the ‘regional radiocarbon calibration’ implied by our chronology for ODP1240 is applied to the few available benthic radiocarbon dates from this core18 (Fig. 5d). Similarly, deep-water ventilation changes observed in the SWP19,21 and the SEP24 all show a broadly similar deglacial trend compared with the EEP, as well as comparable B-Atm values. This coherence is highly significant, as it would confirm that a large volume of the ocean interior was indeed very poorly ventilated during the last glacial period; a proposition that has so far been supported by a paucity of data.

The modern deep South and Equatorial Pacific is currently influenced by UCDW and/or PDW, which occupy similar density and depth ranges and are characterized by low oxygen, high nutrients and high 14C-age33. A hydrographic/dynamical connection between the various ventilation age reconstructions compared in Fig. 5d is therefore entirely plausible; however, it could be seen to conflict with the previous attribution of an AAIW association for core MD07-3088 from the SEP24. Alternatively, the radiocarbon ventilation record from 1,536 m in the SEP24 may in fact reflect the influence of deeper and older water masses such as PDW/UCDW, instead of AAIW as previously proposed24. This speculation is supported by the fact that the SEP core MD07-3088 is currently located just at the boundary between AAIW and PDW. In any event, the deep-water radiocarbon ventilation ages from ODP1240 (this study), and other cores from the deep Eastern Equatorial and South Pacific are all in good agreement with deep radiocarbon ventilation ages from core MD07-3076 from the sub-Antarctic Atlantic28 (Fig. 5d), which is consistent with a Southern Ocean source of deep waters to the deep Pacific.

In this study, we have argued that even relatively small changes in B–P radiocarbon ventilation ages are relevant to the question of deglacial radiocarbon and carbon cycling, especially where these are observed over a large ocean volume like the Pacific. Furthermore, due to the possibility (indeed the likelihood) of significant changes in shallow sub-surface reservoir ages since the last glacial period, relatively small deglacial changes in B–P offsets may not necessarily rule out the occurrence of much larger changes in ocean interior radiocarbon ventilation, even in the low latitudes, as we demonstrate here for the EEP. Indeed, our results underline the crucial importance of constraining surface reservoir ages (or radiocarbon-independent calendar ages). Furthermore, these findings are found to be consistent with other surface- and deep-water ventilation age reconstructions from the southern Pacific and Atlantic. This may reflect glacial circulation patterns that were not very different from modern, albeit with altered surface boundary conditions (air–sea exchange efficiency) in the Southern Ocean in particular, which we identify as the main source region for poorly ventilated deep glacial waters in the shallow sub-surface and deep EEP. These results have implications for the ocean's role in glacial-interglacial carbon cycling, demonstrating an increase in the Pacific Ocean’s mean carbon residence time, which very likely would have contributed to lower atmospheric CO2 during the last glacial period. Furthermore, it would appear that this change in the ventilation state of the glacial Pacific may have stemmed in large part from less effective ocean-atmosphere CO2 exchange in the Southern Ocean in particular.

Methods

Area of study

Sediment core ODP Site 1240 (Ocean Drilling Programme, Leg 202) was collected from the northern flank of the Carnegie Ridge (0°01.31′ N, 86°27.76′ W; 2,921 m water depth) in the southwestern margin of the Panama Basin58. This core location is characterized by high-accumulation-rates (>10–15 cm per kyr58,40), which minimizes possible biases in benthic versus planktonic radiocarbon dating introduced by bioturbation59. The Panama Basin presents two main inflow passages for the deepest waters; one along the Ecuador Trench and another one across the broad central saddle of the Carnegie Ridge (sill depths 2,900 m and 2,300 m, respectively)60,61. Thus, sediment core ODP1240 must be currently bathed by UCDW and/or PDW (the latter also called Common Water62) as both occupy approximately the same density and depth range in the Pacific33. Both UCDW and PDW are characterized by low oxygen (especially the UCDW), high nutrients and large 14C-age although the origin is different. PDW is formed internally in the Pacific from bottom waters upwelling and diffusion, while UCDW is originated by the mixture of PDW and Indian Deep Water that upwells just below the surface in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current33. The shallow sub-surface circulation over our core location is governed by the EUC between 50 and 300 m water depth flowing eastward along the tropics36,37,38. The EUC is partially fed by intermediate water masses (AAIW and Sub-Antarctic Mode Water) originated from upwelled CDW in the Southern Ocean56, that are subsequently subducted by winter convection across the Antarctic Polar Front and Sub-Antarctic Front, respectively, spreading its signature into the Pacific interior. The EUC is also partially fed by Sub-Antarctic Water, which is a central water mass originated in the Subantartic zone that subducts at the Subtropical Front (STF; 30° S) with its core flowing at 150–200 m water depth within the Subtropical gyre63,64.

Sample treatment and analysis

About 19 radiocarbon dates on N. dutertrei (a thermocline-dwelling planktonic foraminifer species, thriving at 100–150 m depth43) and 17 samples of mixed benthic foraminifera were performed from core ODP1240 (that is, 17 paired B–P radiocarbon dates). N. dutertrei was picked from the >212 μm fraction (4–6 mg carbonate per sample), while mixed benthic foraminifera were from the >150 μm fraction (1–6 mg carbonate per sample; adjacent sediment samples were combined when the amount of carbonate was <1 mg).

Sample treatment was performed at the Godwin Laboratory for Palaeoclimate Research of the University of Cambridge (UK). To avoid sample loss, a minimal cleaning approach was carried out: removal of particles, fibres or other detritus or small carbonate clasts with a fine hair brush followed by repeated rinses in deionized water. Cleaned foraminifera were placed into clean glass vials, rinsed with methanol, dried and evacuated prior to graphitization. The calcite was hydrolysed in 0.5 ml of phosphoric acid and then reduced to graphite using a standard hydrogen and iron catalyst method65. Primary and secondary standards were graphitized in parallel with samples. NIST OXII was used as a primary reference standard (for normalization), and IAEA-C7 and -C8 were used as secondary standards (for quality control). When samples were <3 mg carbonate, size-matched aliquots of radiocarbon-dead Iceland Spar calcite were graphitized for small sample background (modern contamination) correction66. The radiocarbon analyses were carried out at The 14CHRONo Centre of the Queen’s University of Belfast (UK) using a National Electrostatic Corporation (NEC) compact model 0.5 MV accelerator mass spectrometer, with online δ13C measurement.

Chronology

The ODP1240 core chronology for the last 25 kyr was rebuilt in this study. The previous age model for this core40 was based on calibrated radiocarbon dates corrected, as is customarily done, for a constant surface reservoir age of 472 years. However, in this study we assessed the variability of shallow sub-surface reservoir ages using independent chronostratigraphic constraints. We found that shallow sub-surface reservoir ages varied significantly over the last 25 kyr and produced new age models that take account of this variability, using the Bayesian depth-age modelling programme Bchron51 and the IntCal09 radiocarbon calibration curve49.

Radiocarbon calculations in modern water column

The modern radiocarbon values for ODP1240 core site were obtained from section P19 of the World Ocean Circulation Experiment63, very close to our core site. Using the ‘Δ14Cnatural’ and applying the equation of Stuiver and Polach67 (t=−8,033ln(1+(Δ14C/1,000)), we calculated the current shallow sub-surface and deep ventilation ages in this site. Thus, the ventilation ages would summarize as: modern shallow sub-surface ventilation age (reservoir age) at 150 m water depth is 735 radiocarbon years; modern deep ventilation age (B-Atm) at 3,000 m water depth is 1,985 radiocarbon years; modern B–P radiocarbon offset between 150 and 3,000 m water depth is 1,250 radiocarbon years.

Additional information

How to cite this article: de la Fuente, M. et al. Increased reservoir ages and poorly ventilated deep waters inferred in the glacial Eastern Equatorial Pacific. Nat. Commun. 6:7420 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8420 (2015).