Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Assessing the observed impact of anthropogenic climate change

Abstract

Impacts of recent regional changes in climate on natural and human systems are documented across the globe, yet studies explicitly linking these observations to anthropogenic forcing of the climate are scarce. Here we provide a systematic assessment of the role of anthropogenic climate change for the range of impacts of regional climate trends reported in the IPCC’s Fifth Assessment Report. We find that almost two-thirds of the impacts related to atmospheric and ocean temperature can be confidently attributed to anthropogenic forcing. In contrast, evidence connecting changes in precipitation and their respective impacts to human influence is still weak. Moreover, anthropogenic climate change has been a major influence for approximately three-quarters of the impacts observed on continental scales. Hence the effects of anthropogenic emissions can now be discerned not only globally, but also at more regional and local scales for a variety of natural and human systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Schematic showing the approach of this analysis.
Figure 2: Average penalties arising from the nine individual steps of the confidence algorithm for the list of impacts analysed.
Figure 3: Confidence level distribution for 118 assessments.
Figure 4: Distribution of confidence levels for impact attribution (horizontal axis) and climate attribution (vertical axis) for the 118 impact–climate trend pairs analysed.
Figure 5: Observed impacts of anthropogenic climate change for the period 1971–2010.
Figure 6: Normalized distributions of region sizes over attribution confidence levels for the combined assessment and the individual steps.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barnett, T. P. et al. Human-induced changes in the hydrology of the western United States. Science 319, 1080–1083 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Christidis, N., Donaldson, G. C. & Stott, P. A. Causes for the recent changes in cold- and heat-related mortality in England and Wales. Climatic Change 102, 539–553 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marzeion, B., Cogley, J. G., Richter, K. & Parkes, D. Attribution of global glacier mass loss to anthropogenic and natural causes. Science 345, 919–921 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenzweig, C. et al. Attributing physical and biological impacts to anthropogenic climate change. Nature 453, 353–357 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, I.-C., Hill, J. K., Ohlemüller, R., Roy, D. B. & Thomas, C. D. Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333, 1024–1026 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cramer, W. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) 979–1037 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bindoff, N. L. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 867–952 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stone, D. A. & Hansen, G. Rapid systematic assessment of the detection and attribution of regional anthropogenic climate change. Clim. Dynam. (2015)10.1007/s00382-015-2909-2.

  9. Mastrandrea, M. D. et al. Guidance Notes for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties (IPCC, 2010); http://193.194.138.236/pdf/supporting-material/uncertainty-guidance-note.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hegerl, G. C. et al. in IPCC Expert Meeting on Detection and Attribution Related to Anthropogenic Climate Change (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 8 (Working Group I Technical Support Unit, IPCC, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, P., Christidis, N. & Stott, P. Anthropogenic impact on Earth’s hydrological cycle. Nature Clim. Change 3, 807–810 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Santer, B. D. et al. Separating signal and noise in atmospheric temperature changes: The importance of timescale. J. Geophys. Res. 116, D22105 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahlstein, I., Knutti, R., Solomon, S. & Portmann, R. W. Early onset of significant local warming in low latitude countries. Environ. Res. Lett. 6, 034009 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Min, S.-K., Zhang, X. & Zwiers, F. W. Human-induced Arctic moistening. Science 320, 518–520 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stott, P. A. et al. Detection and attribution of climate change: A regional perspective. WIREs Clim. Change 1, 192–211 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Delworth, T. L. & Zeng, F. Regional rainfall decline in Australia attributed to anthropogenic greenhouse gases and ozone levels. Nature Geosci. 7, 583–587 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Karoly, D. J. Climate change: Human-induced rainfall changes. Nature Geosci. 7, 551–552 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dong, B. & Sutton, R. Dominant role of greenhouse-gas forcing in the recovery of Sahel rainfall. Nature Clim. Change 5, 757–760 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Giannini, A. et al. A unifying view of climate change in the Sahel linking intra-seasonal, interannual and longer time scales. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 024010 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects (eds Field, C. B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  21. Flato, G. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 741–866 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rosenzweig, C. & Neofotis, P. Detection and attribution of anthropogenic climate change impacts. WIREs Clim. Change 4, 121–150 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hansen, G. & Cramer, W. Global distribution of observed climate change impacts. Nature Clim. Change 5, 182–185 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Harris, I., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J. & Lister, D. H. Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations—the CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 623–642 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hansen, J., Ruedy, R., Sato, M. & Lo, K. Global surface temperature change. Rev. Geophys. 48, RG4004 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Matsuura, K. & Willmott, C. J. Terrestrial air temperature and precipitation: 1900–2010 gridded monthly time series (v.3.01) Tech rep. Univ. Delaware (2012); http://climate.geog.udel.edu/~climate/html_pages/Global2011/index.html

  27. Schneider, U. et al. GPCC’s new land surface precipitation climatology based on quality-controlled in situ data and its role in quantifying the global water cycle. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 115, 15–40 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, M., Xie, P., Janowiak, J. E. & Arkin, P. A. Global land precipitation: A 50-yr monthly analysis based on gauge observations. J. Hydrometeorol. 3, 249–266 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rayner, N. A. et al. Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 4407 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hurrell, J. W., Hack, J. J., Shea, D., Caron, J. M. & Rosinski, J. A new sea surface temperature and sea ice boundary dataset for the Community Atmosphere Model. J. Clim. 21, 5145–5153 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. New, M., Hulme, M. & Jones, P. Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. Part II: Development of 1901-96 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate. J. Clim. 13, 2217–2238 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kennedy, J. J., Rayner, N. A., Smith, R. O., Saunby, M. & Parker, D. E. Reassessing biases and other uncertainties in sea-surface temperature observations since 1850 part 2: Biases and homogenisation. J. Geophys. Res. 116, D14104 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kennedy, J. J., Rayner, N. A., Smith, R. O., Parker, D. E. & Saunby, M. Reassessing biases and other uncertainties in sea surface temperature observations measured in situ since 1850: 1. Measurement and sampling uncertainties. J. Geophys. Res. 116, D14103 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jones, G. S., Stott, P. A. & Christidis, N. Attribution of observed historical near-surface temperature variations to anthropogenic and natural causes using CMIP5 simulations. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 4001–4024 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Grasso, L. D. The differentiation between grid spacing and resolution and their application to numerical modelling. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 81, 579–580 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Allen, M. R. & Tett, S. F. B. Checking for model consistency in optimal fingerprinting. Clim. Dynam. 15, 419–434 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Stone, D. et al. The challenge to detect and attribute effects of climate change on human and natural systems. Climatic Change 121, 381–395 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the IPCC WGII AR5 working group on detection and attribution for their contribution to the impact attribution assessment and the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for CMIP. We thank the climate modelling groups for producing and making available their model output. We wish to thank M. Auffhammer, W. Cramer, C. Huggel, R. Leemans and U. Molau for useful comments, and Y. Estrada for outstanding support with graphics. G.H. was supported by a grant from the German Ministry for Education and Research. D.S. was supported by the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, under contract number DE-AC02-05CH11231.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.H. and D.S. designed the research and prepared the input data, D.S. performed the calculations, G.H. analysed output, G.H. prepared the manuscript with input from D.S.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerrit Hansen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hansen, G., Stone, D. Assessing the observed impact of anthropogenic climate change. Nature Clim Change 6, 532–537 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2896

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2896

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing