Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Shortcomings in wheat yield predictions

Predictions of a 40–140% increase in wheat yield by 2050, reported in the UK Climate Change Risk Assessment, are based on a simplistic approach that ignores key factors affecting yields and hence are seriously misleading.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Historical UK yields and the CRRA wheat yield response function.

References

  1. Knox, J. W., Hurford, A., Hargreaves, L. & Wall, E. Climate Change Risk Assessment for the Agriculture Sector (Defra, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jenkins, G. J. et al. UK Climate Projections: Briefing Report (UK Met Office Hadley Centre, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. IPCC Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J. & Hanson, C. E.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  4. Semenov, M. A. & Shewry, P. R. Sci. Rep. 1, 66 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lobell, D. B., Schlenker, W. & Costa-Roberts, J. Science 333, 616–620 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mitchell, R. A. C. et al. Plant Cell Environ. 18, 736–748 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wheeler, T. R., Batts, G. R., Ellis, R. H., Hadley, P. & Morison, J. I. L. J. Agric. Sci. 127, 37–48 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gibson, L. R. & Paulsen, G. M. Crop Sci. 39, 1841–1846 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. You, L. Z., Rosegrant, M. W., Wood, S. & Sun, D. S. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 149, 1009–1014 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lobell, B. D., Sibley, A. & Ortiz-Monasterio, J. I. Nature Clim. Change 2, 186–189 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Asseng, S., Foster, I. & Turner, N. C. T. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 997–1012 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Porter, J. R. & Semenov, M. A. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360, 2021–2035 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jamieson, P. D. et al. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 82, 27–37 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ewert, F. et al. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 93, 249–266 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meehl, G. A. et al. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 88, 1383–1394 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Long, S. P., Ainsworth, E. A., Leakey, A. D. B., Nosberger, J. & Ort, D. R. Science 312, 1918–1921 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wardlaw, I. F. & Moncur, L. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 22, 391–397 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Rothamsted Research receives strategic funding from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council of the UK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikhail A. Semenov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Semenov, M., Mitchell, R., Whitmore, A. et al. Shortcomings in wheat yield predictions. Nature Clim Change 2, 380–382 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1511

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1511

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing