Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Projected response of an endangered marine turtle population to climate change

Abstract

Assessing the potential impacts of climate change on individual species and populations is essential for the stewardship of ecosystems and biodiversity. Critically endangered leatherback turtles in the eastern Pacific Ocean are excellent candidates for such an assessment because their sensitivity to contemporary climate variability has been substantially studied1,2,3,4. If incidental fisheries mortality is eliminated, this population still faces the challenge of recovery in a rapidly changing climate. Here we combined an Earth system model5, climate model projections assessed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change6 and a population dynamics model to estimate a 7% per decade decline in the Costa Rica nesting population over the twenty-first century. Whereas changes in ocean conditions had a small effect on the population, the 2.5 °C warming of the nesting beach was the primary driver of the decline through reduced hatching success and hatchling emergence rate. Hatchling sex ratio did not substantially change. Adjusting nesting phenology or changing nesting sites may not entirely prevent the decline, but could offset the decline rate. However, if future observations show a long-term decline in hatching success and emergence rate, anthropogenic climate mitigation of nests (for example, shading, irrigation)7,8 may be able to preserve the nesting population.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Biological and climatic projections under the IPCC SRES A2 in the eastern equatorial Pacific and in northwestern Costa Rica.
Figure 2: Nesting population projections under the IPCC SRES A2.
Figure 3: Surface air temperature and precipitation projections under the IPCC SRES A2 in the area encompassing the four main leatherback nesting sites in the eastern Pacific.
Figure 4: Nesting phenology of leatherbacks in relation to the local climate at Playa Grande, Costa Rica.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sieg, A. E. Physiological Constraints on the Ecology of Activity-Limited Ectotherms. (Dissertation, Drexel Univ., 2010).

  2. Santidrián Tomillo, P. et al. Climate driven egg and hatchling mortality threaten survival of eastern Pacific leatherback turtles. PLoS One 7, e37602 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Saba, V. S. et al. The effect of the El Niño Southern Oscillation on the reproductive frequency of eastern Pacific leatherback turtles. J. Appl. Ecol. 44, 395–404 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Saba, V. S., Spotila, J. R., Chavez, F. P. & Musick, J. A. Bottom-up and climatic forcing on the worldwide population of leatherback turtles. Ecology 89, 1414–1427 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rykaczewski, R. R. & Dunne, J. P. Enhanced nutrient supply to the California current ecosystem with global warming and increased stratification in an earth system model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L21606 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meehl, G. A. et al. The WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset: A new era in climate change research. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 88, 1383–1394 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fuentes, M. M. P. B., Fish, M. R. & Maynard, J. A. Management strategies to mitigate the impacts of climate change on sea turtle’s terrestrial reproductive phase. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 17, 51–63 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Patino-Martinez, J., Marco, A., Quiñones, L. & Hawkes, L. A potential tool to mitigate the impacts of climate change to the Caribbean leatherback sea turtle. Glob. Change. Biol. 18, 401–411 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hawkes, L. A., Broderick, A. C., Godfrey, M. H. & Godley, B. J. Climate change and marine turtles. Endangered Species Res. 7, 137–154 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chavez, F. P. et al. Biological and chemical response of the equatorial Pacific Ocean to the 1997–98 El Niño. Science 286, 2126–2131 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sieg, A. E. et al. Sex ratios of leatherback turtles: Hatchery translocation decreases metabolic heating and female bias. Endangered Species Res. 15, 195–204 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Santidrián Tomillo, P., Saba, V. S., Piedra, R., Paladino, F. V. & Spotila, J. R. Effects of illegal harvest of eggs on the population decline of leatherback turtles in Marino Las Baulas National Park, Costa Rica. Conserv. Biol. 22, 1216–1224 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Spotila, J. R., Reina, R. D., Steyermark, A. C., Plotkin, P. T. & Paladino, F. V. Pacific leatherback turtles face extinction. Nature 405, 529–530 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sarti Martinez, A. L. Dermochelys coriacea. in IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2 (2000).

  15. Christensen, J. H. et al. in IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Collins, M. et al. The impact of global warming on the tropical Pacific Ocean and El Niño. Nature Geosci. 3, 391–397 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stock, C. A. et al. On the use of IPCC-class models to assess the impact of climate on Living Marine Resources. Prog. Oceanogr. 88, 1–27 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hays, G. C., Fossette, S., Katselidis, K. A., Schofield, G. & Gravenor, M. B. Breeding periodicity for male sea turtles, operational sex ratios, and implications in the face of climate change. Conserv. Biol. 24, 1636–1643 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McMahon, C. R. & Hays, G. C. Thermal niche, large-scale movements and implications of climate change for a critically endangered marine vertebrate. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 1330–1338 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eckert, S. A. Distribution of juvenile leatherback sea turtle Dermochelys coriacea sightings. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 230, 289–293 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shillinger, G. L. et al. Persistent leatherback turtle migrations present opportunities for conservation. PLoS Biol. 6, 1408–1416 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoffmann, A. A. & Sgrò, C. M. Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature 470, 479–485 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Santidrián Tomillo, P. et al. Influence of emergence success on the annual reproductive output of leatherback turtles. Mar. Biol. 156, 2021–2031 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ryther, J. H. Photosynthesis and fish production in the sea. Science 166, 72–76 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Meehl, G. A. et al. in IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  26. IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (eds Nakićenović N. & Swart R.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).

  27. Clune, P. Natural and Human Induced Variations on Beach Dynamics and their Effects on Leatherback Sea Turtle Conservation. Thesis, Indiana-Purdue Univ. (2005).

  28. Wallace, B. P., Kilham, S. S., Paladino, F. V. & Spotila, J. R. Energy budget calculations indicate resource limitation in Eastern Pacific leatherback turtles. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 318, 263–270 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kalnay, E. et al. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77, 437–470 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Adler, R. F. et al. The version 2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979-Present). J. Hydrometeor. 4, 1147–1167 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support was provided by the Cooperative Institute for Climate Science, Earthwatch Institute, The Betz Chair Endowment of Drexel University and The Leatherback Trust. We thank R. Piedra, C. Padilla and M. Boza for their support to leatherback conservation in Costa Rica. We thank R. Rykaczewski, R. Stouffer andJ. Dunne for reviewing previous versions of this manuscript. We thank J. Dunne and J. John for providing the GFDL-ESM 2.1 simulations used in this study and we thank G. Vecchi and A. Wittenberg for analytical advice. We acknowledge the modelling groups, the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison and the WCRP’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling for their roles in making available the WCRP CMIP3 multimodel data set. Support of this data set is provided by the Office of Science, US Department of Energy. The NCEP reanalysis air temperature data and GPCP precipitation data was provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their web site (www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

V.S. formulated the hypotheses, experiments, CLIMPOP model and conducted the simulations and analyses. C.S. assisted with the CLIMPOP model formulation, simulations, and analyses. P.S.T. led the nesting-beach field study in Costa Rica and formulated the hatchling recruitment component of the nesting-beach model. J.S. and F.P. also led the field campaign in Costa Rica. V.S. and C.S. wrote the manuscript and all authors discussed the analyses and manuscript text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent S. Saba.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 1984 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saba, V., Stock, C., Spotila, J. et al. Projected response of an endangered marine turtle population to climate change. Nature Clim Change 2, 814–820 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1582

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1582

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing