Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Metabolic labeling of C. elegans and D. melanogaster for quantitative proteomics

Abstract

A crucial issue in comparative proteomics is the accurate quantification of differences in protein expression levels. To achieve this, several methods have been developed in which proteins are labeled with stable isotopes either in vivo via metabolic labeling or in vitro by protein derivatization. Although metabolic labeling is the only way to obtain labeling of all proteins, it has thus far only been applied to single- celled organisms1,2 and cells in culture2,3. Here we describe quantitative 15N metabolic labeling of the multicellular organisms Caenorhabditis elegans, a nematode, and Drosophila melanogaster, the common fruit fly, achieved by feeding them on 15N-labeled Escherichia coli and yeast, respectively. The relative abundance of individual proteins obtained from different samples can then be determined by mass spectrometry (MS). The applicability of the method is exemplified by the comparison of protein expression levels in two C. elegans strains, one with and one without a germ line. The methodology described provides tools for accurate quantitative proteomic studies in these model organisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Schematic overview of the experimental approach for metabolic labeling.
Figure 2: Metabolic labeling of C. elegans and D. melanogaster.
Figure 3: Relative quantification of expression levels of proteins in nematodes with and without a germ line.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Oda, Y., Huang, K., Cross, F.R., Cowburn, D. & Chait, B.T. Accurate quantitation of protein expression and site-specific phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 6591–6596 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Conrads, T.P. et al. Quantitative analysis of bacterial and mammalian proteomes using a combination of cysteine affinity tags and 15N-metabolic labeling. Anal. Chem. 73, 2132–2139 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ong, S.E. et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 376–386 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beanan, M.J. & Strome, S. Characterization of a germ-line proliferation mutation in C. elegans. Development 116, 755–766 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fire, A. et al. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391, 806–811 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reinke, V. et al. A global profile of germline gene expression in C. elegans. Mol. Cell 6, 605–616 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, R. & Regnier, F.E. Minimizing resolution of isotopically coded peptides in comparative proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 1, 139–147 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gygi, S.P. et al. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 994–999 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Arbeitman, M.N. et al. Gene expression during the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 297, 2270–2275 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Blagoev, B. et al. A proteomics strategy to elucidate functional protein-protein interactions applied to EGF signaling. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 315–318 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Meiring, H.D. et al. Nanoscale LC-MS(n): technical design and applications to peptide and protein analysis. J. Sep. Sci. 25, 557–568 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schagger, H. & von Jagow, G. Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal. Biochem. 166, 368–379 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Coates, P.J. The prohibitin family of mitochondrial proteins regulate replicative lifespan. Current Biology 7, 607–610 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeroen Krijgsveld.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krijgsveld, J., Ketting, R., Mahmoudi, T. et al. Metabolic labeling of C. elegans and D. melanogaster for quantitative proteomics. Nat Biotechnol 21, 927–931 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt848

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt848

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing