Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Transgenic plants expressing two Bacillus thuringiensis toxins delay insect resistance evolution

Abstract

Preventing insect pests from developing resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins produced by transgenic crops is a major challenge for agriculture. Theoretical models suggest that plants containing two dissimilar Bt toxin genes ('pyramided' plants) have the potential to delay resistance more effectively than single-toxin plants used sequentially or in mosaics. To test these predictions, we developed a unique model system consisting of Bt transgenic broccoli plants and the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. We conducted a greenhouse study using an artificial population of diamondback moths carrying genes for resistance to the Bt toxins Cry1Ac and Cry1C at frequencies of about 0.10 and 0.20, respectively. After 24 generations of selection, resistance to pyramided two-gene plants was significantly delayed as compared with resistance to single-gene plants deployed in mosaics, and to Cry1Ac toxin when it was the first used in a sequence. These results have important implications for the development and regulation of transgenic insecticidal plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Populations of Cry1Ac-/Cry1C-resistant diamondback moths in cages with different Bt broccoli treatments.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roush, R.T. & Shelton, A.M. Assessing the odds: the emergence of resistance to Bt transgenic plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 15, 816–817 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. James, C. Global Status of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 2002 (brief no. 27) (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, Ithaca, New York, USA, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shelton, A.M., Zhao, J.-Z. & Roush, R.T. Economic, ecological, food safety, and social consequences of the deployment of Bt transgenic plants. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47, 845–881 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Carrière, Y. et al. Long-term regional suppression of pink bollworm by Bacillus thuringiensis cotton. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1519–1523 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gould, F. Sustainability of transgenic insecticidal cultivars: integrating pest genetics and ecology. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 43, 701–726 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Roush, R.T. Bt-transgenic crops: just another pretty insecticide or a chance for a new start in resistance management? Pesticide Sci. 51, 328–334 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Roush, R.T. Two-toxin strategies for management of insect resistant transgenic crops: can pyramiding succeed where pesticide mixtures have not? Phil. Trans. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 353, 1777–1786 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shelton, A.M., Tang, J.D., Roush, R.T., Metz, T.D. & Earle, E.D. Field tests on managing resistance to Bt-engineered plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 18, 339–342 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. US Environmental Protection Agency. Biopesticides registration action document for Bacillus thuringiensis plant-incorporated protectants (USEPA, Washington, DC, USA, 16 October 2001). http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/pips/bt_brad.htm

  10. Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, Australian Department of Health and Ageing. Record of GMO and GM Product Dealings under Section 138 of the Gene Technology Act 2000 (DIR-012). (Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, Canberra, Australia, 22 September 2002). http://www.ogtr.gov.au/rtf/gmorec/dirtable.rtf

  11. US Environmental Protection Agency. Biopesticide active ingredient fact sheet: Bacillus thuringiensis Cry2Ab2 protein and the genetic material necessary for its production in cotton. OPP Chemical Code 006487. (USEPA, Washington, DC, USA, 23 December 2002). http://www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/biopesticides/ingredients/factsheets/factsheet_006487.htm

  12. Tabashnik, B.E. et al. Control of resistant pink bollworm (Pectinophora gossypiella) by transgenic cotton that produces Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry2Ab. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 3790–3794 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Roush, R.T. & Daly, J.C. The role of population genetics in resistance research and management. in Pesticide Resistance in Arthropods (eds. Roush, R.T. & Tabashnik, B.E.) 97–152 (Chapman and Hall, New York, 1990).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Heckel, D.G., Gahan, L.J., Liu, Y.B. & Tabashnik, B.E. Genetic mapping of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in diamondback moth using biphasic linkage analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8373–8377 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tabashnik, B.E., Liu, Y.-B., Finson, N., Masson, L. & Heckel, D.G. One gene in diamondback moth confers resistance to four Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1640–1644 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao, J.-Z. et al. Development and characterization of diamondback moth resistance to transgenic broccoli expressing high levels of Cry1C. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 3784–3789 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao, J.-Z., Li, Y.X., Collins, H.L. & Shelton, A.M. Examination of the F2 screen for rare resistance alleles to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in the diamondback moth. J. Econ. Entomol. 95, 14–21 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Baxter, S., Zhao, J.-Z., Shelton, A.M. & Heckel, D.G. Linkage mapping in a multiresistant strain of diamondback moth Plutella xylostella reveals separate genetic mechanisms of Cry1A and Cry1C resistance. Abstracts of the Fourth International Symposium on Molecular Insect Science. J. Insect Sci. 2 (17), 3 (2002). http://www.bioone.org/bioone/?request=get-document&issn=1536-2442&volume=002&issue=17&page=0001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tabashnik, B.E. et al. Insect resistance to transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis crops: lessons from the laboratory and field. J. Econ. Entomol. 96, 1031–1038 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao J.-Z. et al. Different cross-resistance patterns in the diamondback moth resistant to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1C. J. Econ. Entomol. 94, 1547–1552 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shelton, A.M., Cooley, R.J., Kroening, M.K., Wilsey, W.T. & Eigenbrode, S.D. Comparative analysis of two rearing procedures for diamondback moth. J. Entomol. Sci. 26, 17–26 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Metz, T.D., Roush, R.T., Tang, J.D., Shelton, A.M. & Earle, E.D. Transgenic broccoli expressing a Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal crystal protein: implications for pest resistance management strategies. Mol. Breed. 1, 309–317 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cao, J., Tang, J.D., Shelton, A.M. & Earle, E.D. Transgenic broccoli with high levels of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1C protein are resistant to susceptible, cry1A resistant and cry1C resistant diamondback moths. Mol. Breed. 5, 131–141 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cao, J., Zhao, J.-Z., Tang, J.D., Shelton, A.M. & Earle, E.D. Broccoli plants with pyramided cry1C and cry1Ac Bt genes control diamondback moths resistant to Cry1A and Cry1C proteins. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105, 258–264 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tang, J.D. et al. Greenhouse tests on resistance management of Bt transgenic plants using refuge strategies. J. Econ. Entomol. 94, 240–247 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tabashnik, B.E. et al. Inheritance of resistance to Bt toxin Cry1Ac in a field-derived strain of pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 95, 1018–1026 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. SAS Institute. SAS User's Guide, Statistics edn. 5 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA, 1985).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Plate and G. Young for technical assistance and F. Gould for helpful comments on the experimental design. This work was supported by the US Department of Agriculture (NRI 99-35302-7999).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony M Shelton.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, JZ., Cao, J., Li, Y. et al. Transgenic plants expressing two Bacillus thuringiensis toxins delay insect resistance evolution. Nat Biotechnol 21, 1493–1497 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt907

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt907

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing