Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Systemic risk in banking ecosystems

Abstract

In the run-up to the recent financial crisis, an increasingly elaborate set of financial instruments emerged, intended to optimize returns to individual institutions with seemingly minimal risk. Essentially no attention was given to their possible effects on the stability of the system as a whole. Drawing analogies with the dynamics of ecological food webs and with networks within which infectious diseases spread, we explore the interplay between complexity and stability in deliberately simplified models of financial networks. We suggest some policy lessons that can be drawn from such models, with the explicit aim of minimizing systemic risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Notional principal value of outstanding derivative contracts, as recorded at year end.
Figure 2: Discontinuous transition to instability of derivatives as complexity increases.
Figure 3: Schematic model for a node in the interbank network.
Figure 4: Domains of interbank lending.
Figure 5: Recent rise in the size and concentration of the United States financial system.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hutchinson, G. E. Homage to Santa Rosalia, or why are there so many kinds of animals? Am. Nat. 93, 145–159 (1959)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Elton, C. S. The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants (Methuen, 1958)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. MacArthur, R. H. Fluctuations of animal populations, and a measure of community stability. Ecology 36, 533–536 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. May, R. M. Will a large complex system be stable? Nature 238, 413–414 (1972)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stouffer, D. B. et al. Quantitative patterns in the structure of model and empirical food webs. Ecology 86, 1301–1311 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pascuale, M. & Dunne, J. A. Ecological Networks: Linking Structure to Dynamics in Food Webs (Oxford Univ. Press, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dunne, J. A. et al. Network structure and robustness of marine food webs. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 273, 291–302 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. May, R. M. Network structure and the biology of populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 394–399 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bascompte, J. Disentangling the web of life. Science 325, 416–419 (2009)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sugihara, G. & Ye, H. Cooperative network dynamics. Nature 458, 979–980 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dunne, J. A. et al. Compilation and network analyses of Cambrian food webs. PLoS Biol. 6, e102 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Haldane, A. G. Rethinking the financial network. 〈http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/speeches/2009/speech386.pdf〉 (2009)

  13. Jones, C. Preventing system failure. Cent. Banking 21, 69–75 (2010)The survey of recent thinking about financial networks, in lay language.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Farmer, J. D. Market force, ecology and evolution. Ind. Corp. Change 11, 895–953 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Haldane, A. G. The $100 billion question. 〈http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/speeches/2010/speech433.pdf〉 (2010)

  16. Buffet, W. E. Chairman’s Letter. Berkshire Hathaway Inc. 2002 Annual Report 15. (2002)A prescient and clearly expressed warning of problems inherent in derivatives.

  17. Sircar, K. R. & Papanicolau, G. General Black-Scholes models accounting for increased market volatility from hedging strategies. Appl. Math. Finance 5, 45–82 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Avellaneda, M. & Lipkin, M. D. A market-induced mechanism for stock pinning. Quantit. Finance 3, 417–425 (2003)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Osler, C. L. Macro lessons from microstructure. Int. J. Finance Econ. 11, 55–80 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brock, W. A., Hommes, C. H. & Wagner, F. O. O. More hedging instruments may destabilise markets. J. Econ. Dynam. Cont. 33, 1912–1928 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Caccioli, F., Marsili, M. & Vivo, P. Eroding market stability by proliferation of financial instruments. Eur. Phys. J. B 71, 467–479 (2009)A sophisticated and important analysis of a major flaw in the pricing of derivatives.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pliska, S. R. Introduction to Mathematical Finance: Discrete Time Models (Blackwell, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Arrow, K. J. & Debreu, G. Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica 22, 265–290 (1954)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. May, R. M. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems (Princeton Univ. Press, 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nier, E., Yang, J., Yorulmazer, T. & Alentorn, A. Network models and financial stability. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 31, 2033–2060 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gai, P. & Kapadia, S. Contagion in financial networks. Proc. R. Soc. A 466, 2401–2423 (2010)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. May, R. M. & Arinaminpathy, N. Systemic risk: the dynamics of model banking systems. J. R. Soc. Interface 7, 823–838 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gai, P. & Kapadia, S. Liquidity hoarding, network externalities, and interbank market collapse. Proc. R. Soc. A 466, 2401–2423 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schweitzer, F. et al. Economic networks: the new challenges. Science 325, 422–425 (2009)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. May, R. M., Levin, S. A. & Sugihara, G. Complex systems: ecology for bankers. Nature 451, 893–895 (2008)A brief overview of the 2006 NAS/FRBNY study on systemic risk.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kyriakopoulos, F. et al. Network and eigenvalue analysis of financial transaction networks. Eur. Phys. J. B 71, 523–531 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gupta, S., Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. Networks of sexual contacts: implications for the pattern of spread of HIV. AIDS 3, 807–818 (1989)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bastolla, U. et al. The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity. Nature 458, 1018–1020 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Memmott, J. et al. Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 2605–2611 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Battiston, A., Gatti, D. D., Gallegati, M., Greenwald, B. C. & Stiglitz, J. E. Liaisons dangereuses: increasing connectivity, risk sharing and systemic risk. 〈http://www.nber.org/papers/w15611〉 (2009)

  36. Stiglitz, J. Contagion, liberalization, and the optimal structure of globalization. J. Global. Develop. (in the press)

  37. Haldane, A. G. Banking on the state. 〈http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/speeches/2009/speech409.pdf〉 (2009)This gives a more full account of the policy issues discussed here.

  38. Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. Infectious Diseases of Humans: Transmission and Control Ch.12.3 (Oxford Univ. Press, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Barabesi, A.-L. Linked: The New Science of Networks (Perseus, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bank of England. The role of macroprudential policy: a discussion paper. 〈http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/other/financialstability/roleofmacroprudentialpolicy091121.pdf〉 (2009)

  41. Turner, P. The debate on financial system resilience: macroprudential instruments. 〈http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/speeches/2009/speech407.pdf〉 (2009)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to colleagues (particularly S. Kapadia, N. Arinaminpathy and G. Sugihara), who made many helpful comments and constructive criticisms.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M. May.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haldane, A., May, R. Systemic risk in banking ecosystems. Nature 469, 351–355 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09659

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09659

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing