Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Parasitic Cape honeybee workers, Apis mellifera capensis, evade policing

Abstract

Relocation of the Cape honeybee, Apis mellifera capensis, by bee-keepers from southern to northern South Africa in 1990 has caused widespread death of managed African honeybee, A. m. scutellata, colonies1. Apis mellifera capensis worker bees are able to lay diploid, female eggs without mating by means of automictic thelytoky2 (meiosis followed by fusion of two meiotic products to restore egg diploidy), whereas workers of other honeybee subspecies are able to lay only haploid, male eggs. The A. m. capensis workers, which are parasitizing and killing A. m. scutellata colonies in northern South Africa, are the asexual offspring of a single, original worker in which the small amount of genetic variation observed is due to crossing over during meiosis3 (P. Kryger, personal communication). Here we elucidate two principal mechanisms underlying this parasitism. Parasitic A. m. capensis workers activate their ovaries in host colonies that have a queen present (queenright colonies), and they lay eggs that evade being killed by other workers (worker policing)—the normal fate of worker-laid eggs in colonies with a queen4,5,6,7,8. This unique parasitism by workers is an instance in which a society is unable to control the selfish actions of its members.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Ovary activation in A. m. scutellata and parasitic A. m. capensis workers fostered in a queenright A. m. scutellata colony.
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allsopp, M. H. & Crewe, R. M. The cape honey bee as a Trojan horse rather than the hordes of Genghis Khan. Am. Bee J. 133, 121–123 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Verma, S. & Ruttner, F. Cytological analysis of the thelytokous parthenogenesis in the Cape honeybee (Apis mellifera capensis Escholtz). Apidologie 14, 41–57 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kryger, P. in Proc. 13th Entomol. Congr. S. Afrca (eds Olckers, T. & Brothers, D. J.) 38–39 (Entomological Society of Southern Africa, Pretoria, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ratnieks, F. L. W. Reproductive harmony via mutual policing by workers in eusocial Hymenoptera. Am. Nat. 132, 217–236 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ratnieks, F. L. W. & Visscher, P. K. Worker policing in the honey bee. Nature 342, 796–797 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ratnieks, F. L. W. Egg-laying, egg-removal, and ovary development by workers in queenright honey bee colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32, 191–198 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barron, A., Oldroyd, B. P. & Ratnieks, F. L. W. Worker reproduction in honey-bees (Apis) and the anarchic syndrome: a review. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50, 199–208 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Visscher, P. K. Reproductive conflict in honey bees: a stalemate of worker egglaying and policing. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 39, 237–244 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ratnieks, F. L. W. Evidence for a queen-produced egg-marking pheromone and its use in worker policing in the honey bee. J. Apic. Res. 34, 31–37 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oldroyd, B. P. & Ratnieks, F. L. W. Anarchistic honey bee workers evade worker policing by laying eggs that have low removal rates. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 47, 268–273 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Oldroyd, B. P., Smolenski, A. J., Cornuet, J. M. & Crozier, R. H. Anarchy in the beehive. Nature 371, 749 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Beekman, M., Wossler, T. C., Martin, S. J. & Ratnieks, F. L. W. Acceptance of Cape honey bees (Apis mellifera capensis) by African guards (A. m. scutellata). Insectes Sociaux (submitted).

  13. Martin, S., Wossler, T. C. & Kryger, P. The dynamics of usurpation of Apis mellifera scutellata colonies by parasitic A. m. capensis workers. Apidologie (in the press).

  14. Downs, S. G. & Ratnieks, F. L. W. Adaptive shifts in acceptance thresholds by guard honey bees. Behav. Ecol. 9, 326–333 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Downs, S. G., Ratnieks, F. L. W., Badcock, N. & Mynott, A. Honey bee guards do not use food-derived odours to recognise non-nestmates: a test of the odour convergence hypothesis. Behav. Ecol. 12, 47–50 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Neumann, P., Moritz, R. F. A. & Mautz, D. Colony evaluation is not affected by drifting of drone and worker honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) at a performance testing apiary. Apidologie 31, 67–79 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamilton, W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 17–52 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nunney, L. in Levels of Selection in Evolution (ed. Keller, L.) 238–252 (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Natural Environment Reserach Council (UK) and the ‘Social Evolution’ Network financed by the EC Training and Mobility of Researchers program. A. Shella provided the A. m. capensis-infected colonies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis L. W. Ratnieks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, S., Beekman, M., Wossler, T. et al. Parasitic Cape honeybee workers, Apis mellifera capensis, evade policing. Nature 415, 163–165 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/415163a

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/415163a

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing