Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Radical alterations in the roles of homeobox genes during echinoderm evolution

An Erratum to this article was published on 05 March 1998

Abstract

Echinoderms possess one of the most highly derived body architectures of all metazoan phyla, with radial symmetry, a calcitic endoskeleton, and a water vascular system1,2. How these dramatic morphological changes evolved has been the subject of extensive speculation and debate3,4,5, but remains unresolved. Because echinoderms are closely related to chordates and postdate the protostome/deuterostome divergence2,3,6,7, they must have evolved from bilaterally symmetrical ancestors1,2,3,4,5,6. Here we report the expression domains in echinoderms of three important developmental regulatory genes ( distal-less, engrailed and orthodenticle ), all of which encode transcription factors that contain a homeodomain8. Our findings show that the reorganization of body architecture involved extensive changes in the deployment and roles of homeobox genes. These changes include modifications in the symmetry of expression domains and the evolution of several new developmental roles, as well as the loss of roles conserved between arthropods and chordates. Some of these modifications seem to have evolved very early in the history of echinoderms, whereas others probably evolved during the subsequent diversification of adult and larval morphology. These results demonstrate the evolutionary lability of regulatory genes that are widely viewed as conservative.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Evolutionary history of body architecture and regulatory genes within the Metazoa (a) and Echinodermata (b).
Figure 2: Summary of echinoderm development.
Figure 3: Expression of Distal-less protein.
Figure 4: Expression of Orthodenticle protein.
Figure 5: Expression of Engrailed protein in juvenile brittle stars ( Amphipholis squamata ).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hyman, L. The Invertebrates Vol. 4, Echinodermata (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brusca, R. C. & Brusca, G. J. Invertebrates (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jefferies, R. P. S., Brown, N. A. & Daley, P. E. J. The early phylogeny of chordates and echinoderms and the origin of chordate left-right asymmetry and bilateral symmetry. Acta Zool. 77, 101–122 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Holland, N. D. in Echinoderm Phylogeny and Evolutionary Biology (eds Paul, C. R. C. & Smith, A. B.) 13–25 (Clarendon, Oxford, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Raff, R. The Shape of Life (Chicago Univ. Press, 1996).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Nielsen, C. Animal Evolution: Interrelationships of the Animal Phyla (Oxford Univ. Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Turbeville, J. M., Schulz, J. R. & Raff, R. A. Deuterostome phylogeny and the sister group of the chordates: evidence from molecules and morphology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11, 648–655 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duboule, D. (ed) Guidebook to the Homeobox Genes (Oxford Univ. Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Panganiban, G. et al. The origin and evolution of animal appendages. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 5162–5166 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Patel, N. H. Developmental evolution: insights from studies of insect segmentation. Science 266, 581–590 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Finkelstein, R. & Boncinelli, E. From fly head to mammalian forebrain: the story of otx and Otd . Trends Genet. 10, 310–315 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dickinson, J. Molecules and morphology: where's the homology? Trends Genet. 11, 119–121 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bolker, J. & Raff, R. A. Developmental genetics and traditional homology. BioEssays 18, 489–494 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. David, B. & Mooi, R. in Proceedings of the 9th International Echinoderm Conference (eds Mooi, R. & Telford, M.) (Balkema, Amsterdam, in the press).

  15. Malinda, K. M. & Ettensohn, C. A. Primary mesenchyme cell migration in the sea urchin embryo: distribution of directional cues. Dev. Biol. 164, 562–578 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kumé, M. & Dan, K. Invertebrate Embryology (NOLIT, Belgrade, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Holland, P. W. H. Homeobox genes and segmentation: co-option, co-evolution, and convergence. Semin. Sev. Biol. 1, 135–145 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Averof, M., Dawes, R. & Ferrier, D. Diversification of arthropod Hox genes as a paradigm for the evolution of gene functions. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 7, 539–551 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gan, L. et al. An orthodentical-related protein from Strongylocentrotus purpuratus . Dev. Biol. 167, 517–528 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dolecki, G. J. & Humphreys, T. An engrailed class homeo box gene in sea urchins. Gene 64, 21–31 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sharman, A. C. & Holland, P. W. H. Conservation, duplication, and divergence of developmental genes during chordate evolution. Neth. J. Zool. 46, 47–67 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smith, A. B. in Echinoderm Phylogeny and Evolutionary Biology (eds Paul, C. R. C. & Smith, A. B.) 85–97 (Clarendon, Oxford, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wedeen, C. J. & Weisblat, D. A. Segmental expression of an engrailed -class gene during early development and neurogenesis in an annelid. Development 113, 805–814 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lacalli, T. C. Mesodermal pattern and pattern repeats in the starfish bipinnaria larva, and related patterns in other deuterostome larvae and chordates. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351, 1737–1758 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Slack, J. M. W., Holland, P. W. H. & Graham, C. F. The zootype and the phylotypic stage. Nature 361, 490–492 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. DeRobertis, E. M. & Sasai, Y. Acommon plan for dorsoventral patterning in Bilateria. Nature 380, 37–40 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Strathmann, M. F. Reproduction and Development of Marine Invertebrates of the Northern Pacific Coast (Univ. Washington Press, Seattle, WA, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Patel, N. H. et al. Expression of engrailed proteins in arthropods, annelids, and chordates. Cell 58, 955–968 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Patel, N. H. Imaging neuronal subsets and other cell types in whole mount Drosophila embryos and larvae using antibody probes. Methods. Cell Biol. 44, 446–487.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory A. Wray.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lowe, C., Wray, G. Radical alterations in the roles of homeobox genes during echinoderm evolution. Nature 389, 718–721 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/39580

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/39580

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing