Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Group selection is implicated in the evolution of female-biased sex ratios

Abstract

Female-biased sex ratios are common among arthropods that mate in small groups with episodic dispersal1–3. When breeding groups are founded by more than one female, individual (within-group) selection favours an unbiased (1:1) sex ratio, regardless of group size and degree of inbreeding (or sibmating), and regardless of the intensity of local competition among siblings for mates. On the other hand, female-biased sex ratios are favoured by group selection in randomly structured populations. Existing treatments of the evolution of female-biased sex ratios1,2,4–6 correctly predict the result of evolution, but do not make clear that it is a balance between opposing forces at two levels of selection3. I now show this to be so.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hamilton, W. D. Science 156, 477–488 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamilton, W. D. in Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (eds Blum, M. S. & Blum, N. A.) 167–221 (Academic, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson, D. S. & Colwell, R. K. Evolution (in the press).

  4. Maynard Smith, J. The Evolution of Sex (Cambridge University Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bulmer, M. G. & Taylor, P. D. Nature 284, 448–449 (1980); J. theor. Biol 86, 83–89 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Werren, J. H. Science 208, 1157–1159 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Oxford University Press, 1930).

  8. Alexander, R. D. & Sherman, P. W. Science 196, 494–500 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Trivers, R. L. & Hare, H. Science 191, 249–263 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stenseth, N. C. Oikos 30, 83–89 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shaw, R. F. & Mohler, J. D. Am. Nat. 87, 337–342 (1953).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Slatkin, M. & Wade, M. J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75, 3531–3534 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson, D. S. The Natural Selection of Populations and Communities (Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Price, G. A. Ann. hum. Genet. 35, 485–490 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colwell, R. Group selection is implicated in the evolution of female-biased sex ratios. Nature 290, 401–404 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/290401a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/290401a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing