Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript.
The February cover is a moody depiction of climate mental health. Intended to invoke the idea of the interplay among Gaia (the spirit of Earth), nature and humanity, the blue tones also reference the Connecting Climate Minds project. As a means for placing mental health prominently in climate agendas, this initiative is a catalyst for invigorating the broader climate mental health field.
See our Editorial for more on the emerging field of climate mental health
Image: Rebeka Ryvola/Climate Cares Centre. Cover design: Debbie Maizels
As the world grapples with the repercussions of climate change, the consequences for physical and mental health have become more salient. Climate mental health unifies multidisciplinary approaches, including climate science, psychiatry and psychology, to inform and shape public policy and action to mitigate the negative effects of climate change on mental health.
The COVID-19 pandemic caused unprecedented developmental disruptions to children and young people. Here we address its long-term impact on children and young people, relay their views on important issues for mental health in the context of the pandemic and provide recommendations for future research priorities.
In this Q&A, we speak to Melissa Marselle, a member of the British Psychological Society’s Climate Environment Action Coordinating Group, which supports and advises on the implementation of effective climate change and environment work rooted in psychological evidence, and a lecturer of environmental psychology at the University of Surrey, UK. Her research examines the mental health benefits of contact with nature, with a specific focus on biodiversity.
In this Perspective, Minnis and co-authors propose a new framework, the bio-exposome, to integrate the multiple aspects of biological and exposome factors associated with childhood adversity that interact and influence outcomes for individuals across their lifespan.
Erritzoe et al. review the current evidence from neuroimaging studies on psychedelics and discuss how these data advance our understanding of their action.
The authors conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis of 14 studies to evaluate psychological interventions for depression relapse prevention.
Using a large multi-center neuroimaging dataset, Fu, Antoniades et al. reveal that major depressive disorder is characterized by two neuroanatomical dimensions exhibiting distinct treatment response to placebo and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor medications.
Instructions about nicotine strength influence smokers’ perception of the nicotine content in electronic cigarettes and are associated with neural responses in the thalamocortical system.
Using a multivariate approach in a sample from the UK Biobank, the authors examine the genetic relationships between measures of functional connectivity and psychiatric disorders.
Delli Colli and colleagues describe a mathematical model to predict plasticity, and thus susceptibility to change mood according to contextual factors, based on a large sample from the STAR*D dataset.
This longitudinal study of young people with parents with bipolar disorder assessed genetic and symptomatic risks associated with brain surface features, identifying reduced baseline frontotemporal cortical thickness in individuals who developed mood disorders at follow-up.
In this article, the authors use survey data from youth in three countries from the Caribbean to provide an evidence-based model of the association of climate distress and generalized anxiety and well-being more broadly.
In this Analysis, authors survey the current literature landscape COVID-19-related racism and mental health outcomes experienced by Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (AAPI) in the US and provide stakeholder input on addressing and mitigating the effects discrimination.