Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript.
Parsing glioblastoma heterogeneity for redefined classification
Analysis of glioblastoma heterogeneity can classify the disease according to four fundamental functional properties, depicted here as branches of one tree. Genetic alterations common to these four subtypes are within the glioblastoma trunk, but each subtype diverges through distinct genetic lesions and gene-expression programs that incorporate prognostic and therapeutic attributes.
The election of Joe Biden to the US presidency has rekindled optimism in the world of science. To truly bring science to center stage will require bold political moves, the pulling together of all stakeholders, and time.
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, poses a clear and present danger to the health and well-being of populations. Here we discuss its indirect impact on global cancer prevention and control efforts, particularly for cervical cancer. We suggest some comparisons between the COVID-19 pandemic and the human papillomavirus–induced cancer burden, as well as opportunities for translating pandemic-control strategies into effective cancer control.
The complexity of glioblastoma is becoming increasingly recognized. Three recent studies used single-cell approaches that integrate cellular states, transcriptional trajectories, and metabolic alterations to uncover multiple dimensions of cellular and molecular heterogeneity and provide a framework for additional functional investigation and therapeutic development.
Metabolic reprogramming mediates resistance to therapy and rewires cancer-cell-signaling networks, paving the way to the discovery of enhanced treatment strategies through acquired vulnerabilities. A study now points to lipotoxicity dependent on Raf-1 kinase that occurs after activation of the liver receptor LXRα as a therapeutic intervention for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Garofano et al. use single-cell RNA-sequencing data to classify glioblastomas along a metabolic axis of mitochondrial and glycolytic/plurimetabolic states and a neurodevelopmental axis of proliferative/progenitor and neuronal states.
Pugh and colleagues use single-cell RNA sequencing, CRISPR screens and functional assays to define a gradient of developmental and wound-response cell states in glioblastoma stem cells, revealing insights into glioblastoma origins and potential therapeutic targets.
Piccolo and colleagues perform integrated single-cell analyses and identify YAP/TAZ regulation of glioma stem cell differentiation as a core dependency for tumor maintenance.
Zhang and colleagues report that targeting GLS1 alleviates the glutamine dependence of ARID1A-mutated ovarian clear cell carcinomas, thereby suppressing their growth.
Zender, Dauch and colleagues demonstrate that pharmacologically induced lipotoxicity by activating LXRα and Raf-1 inhibition provides a metabolic therapeutic strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Magrini et. al. study sarcoma development and antitumor immune response in complement-deficient murine hosts, demonstrating a role for the C3a–C3aR axis in promoting immunosuppressive macrophages.
Ma et al. apply few-shot learning to train a neural network model on cell-line drug-response data, and they subsequently transfer it to distinct biological contexts including different tissues and patient-derived tumor cells and xenografts.