Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Concordance in the perception of couples recovering from primary surgical treatment of prostate cancer

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 21, pages 253–260 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Although prostate cancer affects men, research shows effects on both members of the couple. We analyzed concordance in couples recovering from primary surgical treatment of prostate cancer when surveyed on psychological domains including emotional status, relationship, self-image, partnership quality and support. Retrospective Sexual Surveys were utilized to survey physiological changes as well as psychological effects. In total, 28 heterosexual couples (56 people) were enrolled. Patients were treated between February 2002 and March 2007 with a median follow-up of 26 (range: 4–59) months. When polled on psychological aspects that may have been affected by treatment, overall concordance was 75.0%. Partnership had the highest concordance (92.2%) with treatment satisfaction questions following in second (90.7%). Subcategories focused on self-image (77.5%), relationship (67.3%), support (66.4%) and emotional status (55.6%), were less concordant. Although couples report relationships as strong and team-like, misconception between partners is widespread. Further research with regards to the effect of such disparities in couples might provide additional insight into improving recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2008. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2008.

  2. Smith DS, Carvalhal GF, Schneider K, Krygiel J, Yan Y, Catalona WJ . Quality-of-life outcomes for men with prostate carcinoma detected by screening. Cancer 2000; 88: 1454–1463.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fowler Jr FJ, Barry MJ, Lu-Yao G, Wasson JH, Bin L . Outcomes of external-beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a study of Medicare beneficiaries in three surveillance, epidemiology, and end results areas. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 2258–2265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuban D, Pollack A, Huang E, Levy L, Dong L, Starkschall G et al. Hazards of dose escalation in prostate cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 57: 1260–1268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Speight JL, Elkin EP, Pasta DJ, Silva S, Lubeck DP, Carroll PR et al. Longitudinal assessment of changes in sexual function and bother in patients treated with external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy, with and without neoadjuvant androgen ablation: data from CaPSURE. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004; 60: 1066–1075.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Garos S, Kluck A, Aronoff D . Prostate cancer patients and their partners: differences in satisfaction indices and psychological variables. J Sex Med 2007; 4: 1394–1403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Penson DF . The effect of erectile dysfunction on quality of life following treatment for localized prostate cancer. Rev Urol 2001; 3: 113–119.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Soloway CT, Soloway MS, Kim SS, Kava BR . Sexual, psychological and dyadic qualities of the prostate cancer ‘couple’. BJU Int 2005; 95: 780–785.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gray RE, Fitch MI, Phillips C, Labrecque M, Klotz L . Presurgery experiences of prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Cancer Pract 1999; 7: 130–135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Baider L, Walach N, Perry S, Kaplan De-Nour A . Cancer in married couples: higher or lower distress? J Psychosom Res 1998; 45: 239–248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hinds C . The needs of families who care for patients with cancer at home: are we meeting them? J Adv Nurs 1985; 10: 575–581.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wellisch DK, Jamison KR, Pasnau RO . Psychosocial aspects of mastectomy: II. The man's perspective. Am J Psychiatry 1978; 135: 543–546.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zahlis EH, Shands ME . The impact of breast cancer on the partner 18 months after diagnosis. Semin Oncol Nurs 1993; 9: 83–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Northouse L . A longitudinal study of the adjustment of patients and husbands to breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 1989; 16: 511–516.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A . The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997; 49: 822–830.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26: 191–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cappelleri JC, Siegel RL, Osterloh IH, Rosen RC . Relationship between patient self-assessment of erectile function and the erectile function domain of the International Index Of Erectile Function. Urology 2000; 56: 477–481.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldstein I, Lue TF, Padma-Nathan H, Rosen RC, Steers WD, Wicker PA . Oral sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Sildenafil Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1397–1404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Meston CM, Derogatis LR . Validated instruments for assessing female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2002; 28 (Suppl 1): 155–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sprangers MA, Aaronson NK . The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: a review. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 743–760.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Carlson LE, Ottenbreit N, St Pierre M, Bultz BD . Partner understanding of the breast and prostate cancer experience. Cancer Nurs 2001; 24: 231–239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R . The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther 2005; 31: 1–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schroeck FR, Donatucci CF, Smathers EC, Sun L, Albala DM, Polascik TJ et al. Defining potency: a comparison of the International Index of Erectile Function short version and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite. Cancer 2008; 113: 2687–2694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC . Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA 1999; 281: 537–544.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC . The epidemiology of erectile dysfunction: results from the National Health and Social Life Survey. Int J Impot Res 1999; 11 (Suppl 1): S60–S64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Walsh PC, Marschke P, Ricker D, Burnett AL . Patient-reported urinary continence and sexual function after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2000; 55: 58–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ellis DS, Manny Jr TB, Rewcastle JC . Focal cryosurgery followed by penile rehabilitation as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer: initial results. Urology 2007; 70 (6 Suppl): 9–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Robinson JW, Donnelly BJ, Saliken JC, Weber BA, Ernst S, Rewcastle JC . Quality of life and sexuality of men with prostate cancer 3 years after cryosurgery. Urology 2002; 60 (2 Suppl 1): 12–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Donna E Levy for statistical assistance. This study was funded by Mary Duke Biddle and the Trent Foundations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke Prostate Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

    J M Mayes, V Mouraviev, M Tsivian, C F Donatucci & T J Polascik

  2. Department of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    T L Krupski

Authors
  1. J M Mayes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V Mouraviev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M Tsivian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T L Krupski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C F Donatucci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. T J Polascik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T J Polascik.

Additional information

Supplementary information accompanies the paper on International Journal of Impotence Research website (http://www.nature.com/ijir)

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mayes, J., Mouraviev, V., Tsivian, M. et al. Concordance in the perception of couples recovering from primary surgical treatment of prostate cancer. Int J Impot Res 21, 253–260 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2009.23

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2009.23

Keywords

Search

Advanced search

Quick links