Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Impact of an educational initiative on applied knowledge and attitudes of physicians who treat sexual dysfunction

Abstract

A randomized, blinded, multicenter, controlled study was undertaken to assess the impact of a multiyear continuing medical education (CME) initiative on physician knowledge and behavior in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of CME and compare applied knowledge and attitude scores of participants in the Consortium for Improvement in Erectile Function (CIEF), to non-CIEF participants. Subjects were selected randomly and contacted anonymously, by mail, email and fax and requested to enroll in this study. A blinded, validated questionnaire and series of standardized patient (SP) case studies and attitude questions were given to CIEF participants, defined as those who showed an interest in learning more about ED and who took at least one CME-certified program on ED from the CIEF website and non-CIEF participants, defined as those who showed interest in learning more about ED and who took at least one CME-certified program on ED from any organization other than CIEF. The primary outcome was a comparison of subjects' scores who participated in at least one CIEF program to non-participants in CIEF programs. Subjects were also compared based on SP case scores, attitude scores, specialty, years in practice, age and gender. Answers were ranked from best to worst and assigned a corresponding value of 10…3, 2, 1 and 0 (10 being the best), assuming that there may be more than one correct answer to each question in clinical practice. SAS version 9.1 analysis of variance model was used by an independent consultant. A total of 120 physicians completed the questionnaire: 87 urologists (UROs) and 33 primary care physicians (PCPs). UROs scored higher on SP cases compared with PCPs (P=0.0039); however, as a result of participating in CIEF programs, PCPs trended toward more comparable scores to UROs; P=0.23 for SP case 2 that was clinically less complex and P=0.19 for SP case 3 that was more complex. In the other two cases, the gap was reduced; however, UROs scored better than PCPs. PCPs in CIEF (n=23) had significantly higher SP case scores compared with non-CIEF PCPs (n=10); 216.6 vs 191.0, respectively (P=0.0437). PCPs in CIEF also showed a significantly greater level in mean attitude scores compared with UROs, 10.82 vs 8.15, respectively (P<0.0001). Both PCPs and UROs scored higher after participating in CIEF ED educational programs than those clinicians who participated in non-CIEF ED educational programs. In addition, clinicians participating in more CIEF programs scored higher than those participating in fewer CIEF programs. As expected, UROs consistently scored better than PCPs, indicating a higher baseline level of knowledge base about ED. However, this educational gap was significantly reduced in PCPs who participated in CIEF programs. The study demonstrated that PCPs who took more CIEF courses were almost as knowledgeable as UROs on the subject of ED. Longitudinal, disease-specific CME initiatives are valuable in that they positively impact the knowledge and thus the behavior of participating physicians, potentially conferring clinical benefits toward patient outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Platano G, Margraf J, Alder J, Bitzer J . Frequency and focus of sexual history taking in male patients—a pilot study conducted among Swiss general practitioners and urologists. J Sex Med 2008; 5: 47–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Margalit AP, Glick SM, Benbassat J, Cohen A, Katz M . Promoting a biopsychosocial orientation in family practice: effect of two teaching programs on the knowledge and attitudes of practicing primary care physicians. Med Teach 2005; 27: 613–618.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marinopoulos SS, Dorman T, Ratanawongsa N, Wilson LM, Ashar BH, Magaziner JL et al. Effectiveness of continuing medical education. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2007; 149: 1–69.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Houge DR . Sex problems in family practice. Fam Pract Res J 1988; 7: 135–140.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fordis M, King JE, Ballantyne CM, Jones PH, Schneider KH, Spann SJ et al. Comparison of the instructional efficacy of Internet-based CME with live interactive CME workshops: a randomized, controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 294: 1043–1051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Parish SJ, Clayton AH . Sexual medicine education: review and commentary. J Sex Med 2007; 4: 259–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kingsberg SA, Malemud CJ, Novak T, Cole-Kelly K, Wile MZ, Spanos P et al. A comprehensive approach to enhancing sexual health education in the Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. Int J Impot Res 2003; 15: S51–S57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsimtsiou Z, Hatzimouratidis K, Nakopoulou E, Kyrana E, Salpigidis G, Hatzichristou D . Predictors of physicians' involvement in addressing sexual health issues. J Sex Med 2006; 3: 583–588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Low WY, Ng CJ, Tan NC, Choo WY, Tan HM . Management of erectile dysfunction: barriers faced by general practitioners. Asian J Androl 2004; 6: 99–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosen R, Kountz D, Post-Zwicker T, Leiblum S, Wiegel M . Sexual communication skills in residency training: the Robert Wood Johnson model. J Sex Med 2006; 3: 37–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang K, He ZJ, Xin ZC, Jin J, Guo YL . Physicians' knowledge and attitude to erectile dysfunction. [Chinese]. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2002; 8: 181–185.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Haro JM, Beardsworth A, Casariego J, Gavart S, Hatzichristou D, Martin-Morales A et al. Treatment-seeking behavior of erectile dysfunction patients in Europe: results of the Erectile Dysfunction Observational Study. J Sex Med 2006; 3: 530–540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Broekman CP, van der Werff ten Bosch JJ, Slob AK . An investigation into the management of patients with erection problems in general practice. Int J Impot Res 1994; 6: 67–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Burd ID, Nevadunsky N, Bachmann G . Impact of physician gender on sexual history taking in a multispecialty practice. J Sex Med 2006; 3: 194–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Poljski C, Tasker C, Andrews C, Wijesinha S, Piterman L, de Kretser D . GP attitudes to male reproductive and sexual health education and promotion: a qualitative study. Aust Fam Physician 2003; 32: 462–465.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the following physicians, who participated in the Phase III validation process: Joel Kaufman, Edward D Kim, L Dean Knoll, Byron T Kelly, Albert Levy, Jean H Lewis, Stephen Auerbach, Benjamin N Hendin, Drogo K Montague, Gurol Erbay, Richard Greengold and Sharon Parish. Other contributors include Ronnie A Weathermon, Romola J Lopez and Estelle P Perera for their input in the study design and data collection, and Deborah L Ross for editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R Shabsigh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shabsigh, R., Sadovsky, R., Rosen, R. et al. Impact of an educational initiative on applied knowledge and attitudes of physicians who treat sexual dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 21, 74–81 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2008.65

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2008.65

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links