Abstract
Although remarkable advances in the understanding of the meiotic process have been achieved in the last few years, the relationship between pairing (alignment of homologous chromosomes), synapsis (intimate association of homologous chromosomes in the synaptonemal complex — SC) and recombination has not been precisely defined. Studies on budding yeast have challenged the traditional view of the SC as a structural support of the recombinational machinery as in yeast early steps in the recombination pathway not only precede SC formation but determine it. On these grounds, recombination should be required for synapsis. This review analyses the experimental evidence concerning the controversial relationship between synapsis and recombination.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Sexually reproducing eukaryotes maintain their chromosome number across generations by means of a special cell division called meiosis. In this process, four haploid germ cells are produced by two successive rounds of chromosome segregation that are not separated by DNA replication. At the first division, homologous chromosomes move to opposite poles. With respect to their origins (maternal and paternal gamete) and genetic content, the segregation of the centromeres and neighbouring regions (which extend to the first crossover points) is reductional. At the second division, the segregation of the centromeres is equational, as it is in mitosis, whereby the two sib-centromeres separate from each other and move to opposite poles. Fusion of gametes at fertilization restores the diploid chromosome number and initiates zygotic development.
To ensure meiotic segregation of a complete set of chromosomes at anaphase I, several structures that facilitate synapsis and recombination between homologues are required: the synaptonemal complex (SC) and the meiotic nodules (MNs). The SC is a meiosis-specific ribbon-like structure of proteinaceous nature consisting of a central element, two flanking lateral elements and linking transverse filaments (Moses, 1968; Heyting, 1996). In early prophase I, each chromosome develops an axial element between sister chromatids that is called a lateral element once homologous chromosomes synapse. The MNs are nucleoprotein complexes visualized by electron microscopy, and are postulated to contain enzymes required in the various stages of recombination. They are associated with the axial elements of the newly formed SCs in zygotene–early pachytene or with mature SCs in mid-late pachytene. The former (early MNs) seem to be involved in homology recognition while the latter (late MNs) indicate the positions where reciprocal recombination takes place (Carpenter, 1987; Plug et al., 1998).
Molecular and enzymatic details of meiotic recombination coupled to classic cytological observations have converted the meiotic process, especially early prophase I stages, to a field of active research in the last few years. In particular, dramatic advances have been carried out using budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, that have challenged some classical views on meiosis, especially the role of the SC in the process of recombination (Kleckner, 1996; Roeder, 1997). These results imply that SC is not essential for the initiation of recombination but recombination is required for synapsis initiation. It is difficult to concentrate many years of research on the relationship between synapsis and recombination in a few pages; therefore, this review is only an attempt to summarize the most relevant experimental evidence in order to show to a broad audience the present state of affairs.
The traditional view (synapsis–recombination)
The hypothesis that SC formation provides a framework for the initiation of crossing over has been mainly based on cytological observations that show that chiasmata occur only in chromosomal regions where a SC is formed (reviewed in Von Wettstein et al., 1984; Loidl, 1994). It assumes that crossovers do not initiate until synapsis has been completed. General evidence for this view is as follows. (i) Some achiasmate organisms (e.g. male Drosophila; Meyer, 1964) do not assemble SCs. (ii) Mutants defective in synapsis are also defective in crossing over. This association has been described in many different species including plants, yeast and insects. For example, in the C(3)G17 mutation which causes elimination of crossovers in female Drosophila, the lateral elements of the complex are absent (Rasmussen, 1975). (iii) Localized chiasmata are associated with localized synapsis. Five situations have been studied in detail, the flatworm Mesostoma ehrenbergii, the boat-lily Rhoeo spathacea and the orthopteran species Tetrix ceperoi, Mishtshenkotetrix brachyptera and Stetophyma grossum (reviewed in del Cerro & Santos, 1997). In the former four species, distal chiasma localization and SC were restricted to the noncentromeric chromosome ends, while in S. grossum eight of the 11 bivalents showed extreme proximal chiasma localization and pericentromeric SCs. (iv) The distribution and frequency of late MNs, which are associated with the central region of the SC, are correlated with the distribution and frequency of chiasmata (reviewed in Carpenter, 1987). This pattern has been observed near the centromeres of Allium fistulosum and near the telomeres of the grasshopper Chloealtis conspersa. Likewise, an absence of localization of late MNs is observed in species that do not have localized chiasmata (Moens, 1994). (v) Evidence that the mean SC length at pachytene and the mean chiasma frequency at diplotene–metaphase I (or mean crossover frequencies) are correlated. These indications emerge from analyses of differences in SC length and chiasma or crossover frequencies between sexes (male vs. female), among individuals of the same sex (Jones & Croft, 1989; Quevedo et al., 1997), or from analysing the effects of additional heterochromatin in meiocytes (Mogensen, 1977). In all cases, higher chiasma/crossover frequencies are associated with longer SCs.
The yeast view (recombination–synapsis–maturation of recombination products)
The view that the stage of commitment to crossing over might precede or accompany the full formation of the SC was already proposed by Maguire (1965, 1966, 1977) on the basis of the strong correlations found in maize heterozygotes between successful homologous synapsis of rearranged chromosome segments, and the occurrence of reciprocal exchange between them and the corresponding normal segments. Studies of meiosis in S. cerevisiae, especially those regarding to the chronology of the recombination pathway support this hypothesis. In this species, the earliest identifiable molecular event in meiotic recombination occurs after some form of homologous alignment (Weiner & Kleckner, 1994), and consists in the appearance of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). DSB formation is followed by the creation of joint DNA molecules which are the first chemically stable connections between the homologous chromosomes at the DNA level. Finally, heteroduplex DNA and mature recombination products appear (Smith & Nicolas, 1998). Temporal studies of synchronized yeast cultures show that DSBs appear early in prophase, prior to formation of mature SC, and disappear in zygotene as synapsis initiates. Joint molecules are present during pachytene, and recombination intermediates are resolved into either reciprocal (crossover) or nonreciprocal (gene conversion) events as the SC disassembles at the end of pachytene (Padmore & Kleckner, 1991). It must be taken into account that in gene conversion events a local DNA interaction is resolved without concomitant exchange of flanking markers (i.e. it is not visualized as a chiasma).
There are a few organisms such as Aspergillus nidulans and Schizosaccharomyces pombe in which high levels of genetic recombination are accomplished in the absence of a detectable SC (Egel-Mitani et al., 1982; Bähler et al., 1993). Several observations indicate that synapsis is also not required for recombination in budding yeast (reviewed in Roeder, 1997). (i) Mutants defective in DSB repair display defects in synapsis that are more severe in those mutants blocked at earlier steps in the repair pathway. (ii) Some mutants allow significant or even-normal levels of meiotic recombination (red 1, mer 1, hop 1 and zip 1) but do not form SCs. For both red 1 and mer 1 mutants, crossover events do not ensure correct segregation at anaphase I. (iii) The occurrence of ectopic recombination events (between homologous sequences on nonhomologous chromosomes) supports the notion that strand exchange takes place through a genome-wide homology search and is not dependent on the formation of the SCs (Engebrecht et al., 1990).
These data are consistent with a model based on the dependence of synapsis on recombination. Synapsis would be initiated at the sites of meiotic recombination events and the formation of the SC would help to convert the recombination intermediates into crossing overs. The recent identification of a meiosis-specific protein (Zip 2) essential for SC formation, which colocalizes with proteins involved in DSB formation and processing, concurs with this hypothesis (Chua & Roeder, 1998).
Is recombination required for synapsis in higher eukaryotes?
Zygotene observations
Most detailed observations on zygotene complements have been carried out in plant chromosomes perhaps due to a superior stainability of their axial elements compared to animals. In different plant species zygotene is characterized by multiple association sites where axial elements show a regular alternation of divergence and convergence. These convergences, or association sites, frequently have nodules associated with them, and occasionally short pieces of central element occupy the space between the axial elements (see for instance Hasenkampf, 1984; Stack & Anderson, 1986; Albini & Jones, 1987; Anderson & Stack, 1988). These observations may be interpreted, according to the yeast model, as evidence that synapsis initiates at sites of recombination events. However, it remains questionable whether all potential initiation sites are actually utilized because detailed comparisons between the number of association sites and the number of short SC stretches have not been carried out. In addition, medium and long SC stretches leave no clues as to their origin, whether from multiple initiations or a low number of initiations combined with SC extension. Also in autotriploids of Allium and Crepis capillaris, two of the three axial elements of each set of three homologues are synapsed, the third is intimately aligned with and accompanies them throughout their whole length being attached to the SC in a variable number of sites (Loidl & Jones, 1986; Vincent & Jones, 1993). The persistence of these association sites between SCs and unsynapsed axes in pachytene has suggested that these associations are potential pairing initiation sites, only some of which are realized as SC initiations.
On the other hand, the nucleoproteins of the early nodules are not necessarily active at zygotene. Recent studies in mouse spermatocytes (Plug et al., 1998) have demonstrated changes in protein composition of MNs during zygotene and pachytene, suggesting a differentiation of these nodules during the process of synapsis. These sequential changes indicate that RAD51, a mammalian homologue of Escherichia coli RecA protein, is present on both asynapsed and synapsed axes but colocalizes with a single-strand DNA binding protein (RPA) when homologous chromosomes synapse. In vitro experiments indicate that RAD51 cannot carry out strand exchange in the absence of RPA. This leads to the conclusion that the activation of RAD51 by RPA occurs at the time of synapsis. If so, these results would suggest a role of SC as a prerequisite for recombination.
Synaptic patterns and chiasma distributions
Both yeast and traditional views of meiosis are able to explain the correlations between the frequency and location of SC initiation sites and crossovers (late MNs and/or chiasmata) that have been observed in materials as diverse as the fungus Sordaria macrospora (Zickler et al., 1992) and the males of the grasshopper Pyrgomorpha conica (del Cerro et al., 1996).
Let me consider two examples in some detail: (i) Maguire & Riess (1994) observed in maize heterozygous for a short paracentric inversion, a consistent relation in the inverted region between the frequency of homologous synapsis at pachytene, the frequency of late MNs, and the frequency of crossovers estimated from bridge-fragment frequencies at anaphase I and anaphase II. (ii) In the normal monochiasmate S8 bivalents (BB) of the grasshopper Chorthippus jacobsi, synapsis usually starts at or near the distal ends of the long arms and the chiasma is preferentially located at these chromosome regions. On the contrary, S8 bivalents heterozygous for a distal supernumerary segment (BS) display a change both in the synaptic pattern and in chiasma distribution. Thus, synapsis is initiated near the pericentromeric region and the single chiasma formed is mainly located there (Santos et al., 1993).
These results concur very well with the idea that recombination is required for synapsis (yeast view). However, Maguire & Riess (1994) do not discard the possibility that crossing over may invariably follow synapsis of the chromosome region involved in the inversion. Another possibility is that inversion loops in which crossover has not occurred are reorganized into nonhomologously synapsed straight regions by dissolution and reassembly of the SC. Also failure of homologous synapsis in the inverted segment at zygotene could lead to nonhomologous synapsis at mid pachytene (Rasmussen & Holm, 1979). On the other hand, chiasma redistribution observed in grasshopper bivalents heterozygous for supernumerary segments of Ch. jacobsi males could be explained by the existence of heterosynapsis in the region near the extra segment at late zygotene–early pachytene. The bivalents exhibited SC formation with equalized axial lengths, and absence of chiasmata in those regions in which nonhomologous synapsis took place (Santos et al., 1993). This could also be an adequate explanation for those chiasma redistributions produced by other supernumerary segments in the grasshopper Stenobothrus festivus despite in this species there being no differences in the patterns of initiation of synapsis displayed by BB and BS bivalents (del Cerro & Santos, 1997).
The relationship between the patterns of synapsis to distributions of late MNs and chiasmata is not so evident in other species because the number of sites of synaptic initiations do not correspond with the number of late MNs/crossovers, or because synapsis initiates in regions that are devoid of chiasmata. For instance, in plants with long chromosomes the number of synaptic initiations may greatly exceed the number of chiasmata (Hasenkampf, 1984; Gillies, 1985). On the other hand, from the the frequency of pairing partner switches in tetraploid yeast, Loidl (1995) has estimated that stable synapsis is initiated at ~22 sites per diploid nucleus while the mean number of crossovers per nucleus is about 75. In tomato translocation heterozygotes, synapsed arms often lack late MNs (Herickhoff et al., 1993) and in oocytes of Triturus cristatus and pollen mother cells of A. fistulosum crossovers are localized proximally (near the centromere) and the proximal regions of homologous chromosomes come into contact late, only by zipper-like growth of SC which is initiated distally (e.g. Albini & Jones, 1987). Also telocentric medium-sized bivalents of St. festivus show a single chiasma, mostly distally located, and synapsis starts at centromeric regions (del Cerro & Santos, 1997). It is likely that in these cases crossovers form only when the SC has conferred the initial homologous contacts to proximal (T. cristatus and A. fistulosum) or distal (St. festivus) regions.
In contrast with this traditional view, it can be argued that some synaptic initiations are only accompanied by nonreciprocal recombination events. But, what is the magnitude of this phenomenon? Unfortunately, data on gene conversion events in higher eukaryotes are very scarce due to technical difficulties in obtaining them. In the rosy locus of Drosophila, noncrossovers exceed crossovers by a factor of four (Hilliker & Chovnick, 1981). In yeast and Neurospora crossing over was associated in most cases with ~35% of conversion events although gene conversion alone accounts for more than 90% of recombination events at the am locus of Neurospora crassa (Bowring & Catcheside, 1996).
Achiasmate organisms and recombination-defective mutants
The existence of achiasmate organisms that show complete SC formation such as Bombyx females (Rasmussen & Holm, 1979) and the males of a number of species from two families of Australian scorpions (Shanahan & Hayman, 1990) indicates that the SC does not determine the occurrence of crossing over, but is synapsis dependent on nonreciprocal recombination in these organisms? In Drosophila for instance, there are meiotic mutants proficient in gene conversion but deficient in crossing over that assemble SCs normally (Carpenter, 1979). Data from Bombyx (Rasmussen & Holm, 1982) indicate that in chiasmate spermatocytes, early MNs appear at early zygotene simultaneously with the initiation of the SC formation and increase in number by late zygotene (about 91 per nucleus). Between late zygotene and early pachytene, the number decreases by 41%. A drastic reduction in the number of MNs could be related to the occurrence of reciprocal and nonreciprocal recombination. In achiasmate oocytes, no MNs of either type were observed, so it seems that in silkworm females synapsis might be independent of recombination.
Two other cases that exemplify a similar situation have been reported recently. (i) Female Drosophila homozygous for either of two mutations, mei W-68 and mei-P22, are characterized by an elimination of gene conversion, elimination of crossing over, lack of DSBs and failure to produce early or late MNs, but still develop normal SC (McKim et al., 1998). However, it remains to be ascertained, whether the existence of somatic pairing between homologues somehow conditions the meiotic process in this species. (ii) Dennburg et al. (1998) have found in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans that a homologue of the yeast DSB-generating enzyme Spo11p is required for meiotic exchange. The enzyme can be by-passed by radiation-induced breaks, indicating that the initiation of meiotic recombination is conserved in this species. In addition, in a C. elegans spo-11 null mutant, homologous synapsis occurs normally.
Elimination of multivalents
Rasmussen & Holm (1979) reported a drastic reduction in the number of multivalents between early and late pachytene in achiasmate autotetraploid females of Bombyx mori but not in chiasmate autotetraploid males (Rasmussen, 1987). This remarkable sex-dependent difference in the behaviour of multivalents during meiotic prophase was interpreted as the occurrence of crossing over at pachytene in the male preventing further conversion of quadrivalents into bivalents. On the contrary, the absence of crossovers in the female enabled such conversion prior to the SC modifications required to maintain bivalents until metaphase I. The elimination of multivalents is a common process in other polyploid species from genera such as Triticum, Scilla, Lotus, Lolium and Festuca (Holm, 1986; White et al., 1988; Davies et al., 1990; Jenkins & White, 1990; Thomas & Thomas, 1993). It is proposed that the diploid behaviour displayed by these species is the result of a high pairing stringency of homologous chromosomes at zygotene, which is followed by a correction mechanism that transforms multivalents into homologous bivalents during zygotene and pachytene and, ultimately, by suppression of crossing over in any homoeologous SC segments that might persist at this stage (Martínez et al., 1996 and references therein).
Since the elimination of multivalents would depend on whether or not they are fixed by crossovers, this process has been interpreted as supporting the traditional view that crossing over occurs within the framework of the SC. However, this evidence does not exclude the initiation of recombination events much earlier in prophase I.
Ectopic recombination
Ectopic gene conversion in yeast between artificially induced repeats (two alelles present at the normal locus and another one or several copies inserted elsewhere in the genome) is associated with crossing over of flanking sequences. However, it is not associated with reciprocal recombination when measured between naturally occurring repeats such as Ty retrotransposons (Parket et al., 1995). Therefore, although ectopic gene conversion may be a consequence of genome-wide homology scanning in yeast, mechanisms also seem to exist that suppress ectopic reciprocal recombination, and hence chromosome rearrangements. In fact, a mutant (hop 2) described recently shows a phenotype consisting of wild-type amounts of SC, but most chromosomes engaged in synapsis with nonhomologous partners (Leu et al., 1998).
Mechanisms that prevent ectopic recombination seem also to exist in mammals since the analysis of the synaptic behaviour in a mouse hemizygous for two transgenes (lacI and lacZ) present in chromosomes 4 and 3, respectively, did not reveal the existence of SC formation between the two transgenes (Moens et al., 1997). In addition, similar mutants to hop2 have been also described in rye (Fedotova et al., 1994). However, the nonavailability of allelic homology in haploid meiosis promotes ectopic reciprocal recombination both in yeast (about 6% of events per meiosis; Loidl & Nairz, 1997) and plants (about 0.38 chiasmata per meiocyte in rye; Santos et al., 1994). The differences between both materials probably being due to the rareness of repeated sequences in yeast compared with higher plants. At least in haploid rye, the correspondence between the location of SC initiation sites and chiasmata indicates that early synapsis could be confined to homologous regions.
Concluding remarks
The available experimental evidence on the relationship between synapsis and recombination does not assist greatly in deciding between the two conflicting views about this subject because many observations can be interpreted to support either of them. The data from yeast suggest that SC formation may require initiation of recombination or, alternatively, that recombination and SC formation are mutually interdependent processes. However, data from Bombyx, Drosophila and C. elegans suggest that, at least in these organisms, SC formation does not require initiation of recombination. Furthermore, in other species the correspondence between SC initiation sites and recombination events is not always evident. A synthetic hypothesis might be that there is a certain variation between organisms in the commitment to recombination and it may occur before, during or just after the initiation of synapsis (Maguire, 1977), but only some kinds of synaptic initiation sites would be resolved as crossing overs which ensure proper chromosome segregation. In higher eukaryotes, a large-scale synapsis could represent a security mechanism to avoid reciprocal exchanges between homologous DNA sequences at nonhomologous chromosomal regions.
References
Albini, S. M. and Jones, G. H. (1987). Synaptonemal complex spreading in Allium cepa and A. fistulosum I. The initiation and sequence of pairing. Chromosoma, 95: 324–338.
Anderson, L. K. and Stack, S. M. (1988). Nodules associated with axial cores and synaptonemal complexes in Psilotum nudum. Chromosoma, 97: 96–100.
Bähler, J., Wyler, T., Loidl, J. and Kohli, J. (1993). Unusual nuclear structures in meiotic prophase of fission yeast: a cytological analysis. J Cell Biol, 121: 241–256.
Bowring, F. J. and Catcheside, D. E. A. (1996). Gene conversion alone accounts for more than 90% of recombination events at the am locus of Neurospora crassa. Genetics, 143: 129–136.
Carpenter, A. T. C. (1979). Recombination nodules and synaptonemal complex in recombination-defective females of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma, 75: 259–292.
Carpenter, A. T. C. (1987). Gene conversion, recombination nodules, and initiation of meiotic synapsis. Bioessays, 6: 232–236.
Chua, P. R. and Roeder, G. S. (1998). Zip 2, a meiosis-specific protein required for the initiation of chromosome synapsis. Cell, 93: 349–359.
Davies, A., Jenkins, G. and Rees, H. (1990). Diploidisation of Lotus corniculatus L. (Fabaceae) by elimination of multivalents. Chromosoma, 99: 289–295.
Del Cerro, A. L., Fernández, A. and Santos, J. L. (1996). Chiasma localization, heterochromatin and synaptonemal complexes in the grasshopper Pyrgomorpha conica. Chromosome Res, 4: 69–76.
Del Cerro, A. L., Jones, G. H. and Santos, J. L. (1997). Chiasma localization and incomplete synapsis in two species of Tetrigidae (Orthoptera). Chromosome Res, 5: 69–71.
Del Cerro, A. L. and Santos, J. L. (1997). Chiasma redistribution in the presence of different sized supernumerary segments in a grasshopper: dependence on nonhomologous synapsis. Genome, 40: 682–688.
Dernburg, A. F., McDonald, K., Moulder, G., Barstead, G., Dresser, M. and Villeneuve, A. M. (1998). Meiotic recombination in C. elegans initiates by a conserved mechanism and is dispensable for homologous chromosome synapsis. Cell, 94: 387–398.
Egel-Mitani, M., Olson, L. W. and Egel, R. (1982). Meiosis in Aspergillus nidulans: another example for lacking synaptonemal complexes in the absence of crossover interference. Hereditas, 97: 179–187.
Engebrecht, J., Hirsch, J. and Roeder, G. S. (1990). Meiotic gene conversion, and crossing over: their relationship to each other and to chromosome synapsis and segregation. Cell, 62: 927–937.
Fedotova, Y. S., Bogdanov, Y. F., Gadzhiyeva, S. A., Sosnikhina, S. A., Smirnov, V. G. and Mikhailova, E. I. (1994). Meiotic mutants of rye Secale cereale II. The nonhomologous synapsis in desynaptic mutants sy 7 and sy 10. Theor Appl Genet, 88: 1029–1036.
Gillies, C. B. (1985). An electron microscopic study of synaptonemal complex formation at zygotene in rye. Chromosoma, 92: 165–175.
Hasenkampf, C. A. (1984). Synaptonemal complex formation in pollen mother cells of Tradescantia. Chromosoma, 90: 275–284.
Herickhoff, L., Stack, S. and Sherman, J. (1993). The relationship between synapsis, recombination nodules and chiasmata in tomato translocation heterozygotes. Heredity, 71: 373–385.
Heyting, C. (1996). Synaptonemal complex: structure and function. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 81: 386–396.
Hilliker, A. J. and Chovnick, A. (1981). Further observations on intragenic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res, 38: 281–296.
Holm, P. B. (1986). Chromosome pairing and chiasma formation in allohexaploid wheat, Triticum aestivum analysed by spreading of meiotic nuclei. Carlsberg Res Comm, 51: 239–294.
Jenkins, G. and White, J. (1990). Elimination of synaptonemal complex irregularities in a Lolium hybrid. Heredity, 64: 45–53.
Jones, G. H. and Croft, J. A. (1989). Chromosome pairing and chiasma formation in spermatocytes and oocytes of Dendrocoelum lacteum (Turbellaria: Tricladida); a cytogenetical and ultrastructural study. Heredity, 63: 97–106.
Kleckner, N. (1996). Meiosis: how could it work? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 93: 8167–8174.
Leu, J.-Y., Chua, P. R. and Roeder, G. S. (1998). The meiosis-specific Hop2 protein of S. cerevisiae ensures synapsis between homologous chromosomes. Cell, 94: 375–386.
Loidl, J. (1994). Cytological aspects of meiotic recombination. Experientia, 50: 285–294.
Loidl, J. (1995). Meiotic chromosome pairing in triploid and tetraploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics, 139: 1511–1520.
Loidl, J. and Jones, G. H. (1986). Synaptonemal complex spreading in Allium I. Triploid A. sphaerocephalon. Chromosoma, 93: 420–428.
Loidl, J. and Nairz, K. (1997). Karyotype variability in yeast caused by nonnallelic recombination in haploid meiosis. Genetics, 146: 79–88.
Maguire, M. P. (1965). The relationship of crossover frequency to synaptic extent at pachytene in maize. Genetics, 51: 23–40.
Maguire, M. P. (1966). The relationship of crossing over to chromosome synapsis in a short paracentric inversion. Genetics, 53: 1071–1077.
Maguire, M. P. (1977). Homologous chromosome pairing. Phil Trans R Soc B, 277: 245–258.
Maguire, M. P. and Riess, R. W. (1994). The relationship of homologous synapsis and crossing-over in a maize inversion. Genetics, 137: 281–288.
Martínez, M., Naranjo, T., Cuadrado, C. and Romero, C. (1996). Synaptic behaviour of the tetraploid wheat Triticum timopheevii. Theor Appl Genet, 93: 1139–1144.
McKim, K. S., Green-Marroquin, B. L., Sekelsky, J. J., Chin, G., Steinberg, C., Khodosh, R. and Hawley, R. S. (1998). Meiotic synapsis in the absence of recombination. Science, 279: 876–878.
Meyer, G. F. (1964). A possible correlation between the submicroscopic structure of meiotic chromosomes and crossing over. Proc. 3rd Eur. Reg Conf. Electron Microsci. 461–462.
Moens, P. B. (1994). Molecular perspectives of chromosome pairing at meiosis. Bioessays, 16: 101–106.
Moens, P. B., Heddle, J. A. M., Spyropoulos, B. and Heng, H. H. Q. (1997). Identical megabase transgenes on mouse chromosomes 3 and 4 do not promote ectopic pairing or synapsis at meiosis. Genome, 40: 770–773.
Mogensen, H. L. (1977). Ultrastructural analysis of female pachynema and the relationship between synaptonemal complex length and crossing-over in. Zea mays Carlsberg Res Comm, 42: 475–497.
Moses, M. J. (1968). Synaptinemal complex. Ann Rev Genet, 2: 363–412.
Padmore, R . CAO, L. and Kleckner, N. (1991). Temporal comparison of recombination and synaptonemal complex formation during meiosis in S. cerevisiae. Cell, 66: 1239–1256.
Parket, A., Inbar, O. and Kupiec, M. (1995). Recombination of Ty elements in yeast can be induced by a double-strand break. Genetics, 140: 67–77.
Plug, A. W., Peters, A. H. F. M., Keegan, K. S., Hoekstra, M. F., Deboer, P. and Ashley, T. (1998). Changes in protein composition of meiotic nodules during mammalian meiosis. J Cell Sci, 111: 413–423.
Quevedo, C., Del Cerro, A. L., Santos, J. L. and Jones, G. H. (1997). Correlated variation of chiasma frequency and synaptonemal complex length in Locusta migratoria. Heredity, 78: 515–519.
Rasmussen, S. W. (1975). Ultrastructural studies of meiosis in males and females of the C (3) G17mutant of Drosophila melanogaster. C R Trav Lab Carlsberg, 40: 163–173.
Rasmussen, S. W. (1987). Chromosome pairing in autotetraploid Bombyx males. Inhibition of multivalent correction by crossing over. Carlsberg Res Comm, 93: 211–242.
Rasmussen, S. W. and Holm, P. B. (1979). Chromosome pairing in autotetraploid Bombyx females. Mechanism for exclusive bivalent formation. Carlsberg Res Comm, 44: 101–125.
Rasmussen, S. W. and Holm, P. B. (1982). The meiotic prophase in Bombyx mori. In: R. C. King & H. Akai (eds) Insect Ultrastructure, Vol. 1, pp. 61–85. Plenum Press, New York.
Roeder, G. S. (1997). Meiotic chromosomes: it takes two to tango. Genes Dev, 11: 2600–2621.
Santos, J. L., Del Cerro, A. L., Fernández, A. and Díez, M. (1993). The relationship between synapsis and chiasma distribution in grasshopper bivalents heterozygous for supernumerary segments. Heredity, 70: 135–141.
Santos, J. L., Jiménez, M. M. and Díez, M. (1994). Meiosis in haploid rye: extensive synapsis and low chiasma frequency. Heredity, 73: 580–588.
Shanahan, C. M. and Hayman, D. L. (1990). Synaptonemal complex formation in male scorpions exhibiting achiasmate meiosis in structural heterozygotes. Genome, 33: 914–926.
Smith, K. N. and Nicolas, A. (1998). Recombination at work at meiosis. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 8: 200–211.
Stack, S. and Anderson, L. (1986). Two-dimensional spreads of synaptonemal complexes from solanaceous plants. III. Recombination nodules and crossing over in Lycopersicon esculentum. Chromosoma, 94: 253–258.
Thomas, H. M. and Thomas, B. J. (1993). Synaptonemal complex formation in two allohexaploid Festuca species and a pentaploid hybrid. Heredity, 71: 305–311.
Vincent, J. E. and Jones, G. H. (1993). Meiosis in autopolyploid Crepis capillaris I. Triploids and trisomics; implications for models of chromosome pairing. Chromosoma, 102: 195–206.
von Wettstein, D., Rasmussen, S. W. and Holm, P. B. (1984). The synaptonemal complex in genetic segregation. Ann Rev Genet, 18: 331–413.
Weiner, B. M. and Kleckner, N. (1994). Chromosome pairing via multiple interstitial interactions before and during meiosis in yeast. Cell, 77: 977–991.
White, J., Jenkins, G. and Parker, J. S. (1988). Elimination of multivalents during meiotic prophase in Scilla autumnalis I. Diploid and triploid. Genome, 30: 930–939.
Zickler, D., Moreau, P. J. F., Huynh, A. D. and Slezec, A. (1992). Correlation between pairing sites, recombination nodules and meiotic recombination in Sordaria macrospora. Genetics, 132: 135–148.
Acknowledgements
I am very grateful to Gareth Jones for many stimulating discussions on the meiotic process. I thank Andrew Pomiankowski and anonymous reviewers for comments of the manuscript and to Spanish colleagues: P. Arana, J. Cabrero, J. P. M. Camacho, N. Cuñado, M. Díez, A. M. Figueiras, C. García de la Vega, M. Martínez, T. Naranjo, C. Romero, J. S. Rufas and J. A. Suja for their useful advise. I apologize to those researchers whose work was not cited due to the brevity of this review. This work was supported by the grant PB95–0421 awarded by the Dirección General de Enseñanza Superior (DGES).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santos, J. The relationship between synapsis and recombination: two different views. Heredity 82, 1–6 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6884870
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6884870
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Genetic Collection of Meiotic Mutants of Rye Secale cereale L.
Russian Journal of Genetics (2005)